STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 50%vs 43.4% avg · +6.6 pts
- Masters
- 22%vs 17.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Among 1,112 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Dorothy Thompson MS
Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 260 students
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- −2 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +4.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 457 of 1,200tied with 54 others
- Score vs region
- −3.7 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
- Region 01: Edinburg placement
- 367 of 505tied with 23 others
- Score vs county
- −2.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County
- Hidalgo County placement
- 165 of 253tied with 13 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +1.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 2,057 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 983 of 2,057tied with 70 others
- Score vs state
- +0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is below the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 2,057 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
82 +4.2 pts vs 77.8
- 82 is 4.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,200 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-context average
86 +7.1 pts vs 78.9
- 86 is 7.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,111 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Region 01: Edinburg.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Hidalgo County.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-size average
86 +4.8 pts vs 81.2
- 86 is 4.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,842 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the similar-size average
86 +7.4 pts vs 78.6
- 86 is 7.4 points above the 78.6 average among 1,841 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas average
86 +4.8 pts vs 81.2
- 86 is 4.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the Texas average
86 +7.6 pts vs 78.4
- 86 is 7.6 points above the 78.4 average among 7,237 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Dorothy Thompson MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 457th of 1,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).
Dorothy Thompson MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 367th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 23 others).
Dorothy Thompson MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 165th of 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County (tied with 13 others).
Dorothy Thompson MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 2,057 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 983rd of 2,057 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 70 others).
Dorothy Thompson MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,846th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 294 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 77.8 1,200 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 85 | 77.4 1,186 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 81 | 73.7 1,174 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 69 | 72.6 1,172 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 84 | 81.8 1,162 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Dorothy Thompson MS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,200 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 74 | C | 6 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 72 | C | 8 |
| Academic Growth | 73 | C | 7 |
| Relative Performance | 86 | B | 4 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,200 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 260
- Economically disadvantaged
- 100.0%+5.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 54.2%+9.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.7%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.6%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 19.8%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Dorothy Thompson MS
- Hispanic 99.6%
- White 0.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort
- African American 15.5%
- Hispanic 77.8%
- White 4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.5%
- White 1.9%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.8%
- White 1.5%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,057 reporting for every category shown · 2,057 in full cohort
- African American 10.1%
- Hispanic 51.1%
- White 33.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 260
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 260
- Emergent bilingual students
- 141
- Special education students
- 46
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 25
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 298
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 8.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 260 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 21 (7.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 260
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −21
Decrease · −7.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- −37
Decrease · −12.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 260
- Selected comparison
- 539.6
| School year | Students enrolledDorothy Thompson MS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 297 | First available year | 592.1 |
| 2022–23 | 326 | Increase of 29 (9.8%) | 585.3 |
| 2023–24 | 291 | Decrease of 35 (10.7%) | 575.7 |
| 2024–25 | 281 | Decrease of 10 (3.4%) | 568.8 |
| 2025–26 | 260 | Decrease of 21 (7.5%) | 539.6 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 298
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 374 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 332 | 42 | 12.7% | 71 | 21.39 | 13.0% | 30.6 |
| 2022–23 | 342 | 83 | 24.3% | 214 | 62.57 | 13.7% | 32.3 |
| 2023–24 | 308 | 74 | 24.0% | 151 | 49.03 | 14.0% | 33.2 |
| 2024–25 | 298 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Dorothy Thompson MS
- Parent district: Progreso ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,574
- Selected comparison
- $13,706
For 2025, TEA reported $12,574 per student for this campus, $20,744 per student for its parent district, Progreso ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Dorothy Thompson MS | Parent district: Progreso ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $8,180 | $12,937 | $13,054 | $8,427 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,133 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $8,612 | $13,716 | $13,108 | $8,365 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,147 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,770 | $13,134 | $14,058 | $8,876 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,150 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,506 | $13,916 | $14,797 | $9,811 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,150 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $10,810 | $17,163 | $15,708 | $11,209 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $10,077 | $17,683 | $16,792 | $11,893 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,172 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $12,172 | $21,826 | $18,125 | $13,008 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,574 | $20,744 | $18,972 | $13,706 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $61,325−$7,519 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 32−5.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 8.1−6.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Dorothy Thompson MS
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 28.9%
- 6 to 10 years 24.8%
- 11 to 20 years 40.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,200 reporting for every category shown · 1,200 in full cohort
- Beginning 8%
- 1 to 5 years 26.9%
- 6 to 10 years 18.5%
- 11 to 20 years 26.8%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 35%
- 21 to 30 years 22.6%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.3%
- 1 to 5 years 18.4%
- 6 to 10 years 17.1%
- 11 to 20 years 37.2%
- 21 to 30 years 21.6%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,057 reporting for every category shown · 2,057 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.5%
- 1 to 5 years 24.6%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.6%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 4.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classDorothy Thompson MS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 17.5 | 17.2 |
| Secondary English | 12.5 | 15 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 10.1 | 17.9 |
| Secondary math | 14.3 | 16.7 |
| Secondary science | 15.7 | 17.6 |
| Secondary social studies | 15.5 | 17.5 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108910041.