Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Dodd City School

Fannin County · Region 10: Richardson · 319 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.6 ptsvs 85.4 average · 1,237 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
388 of 1,237tied with 69 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.4 average for 1,237 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 5 points

85 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 7.2 points above the 82.8 average among 1,190 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

90 +4.6 pts vs 85.4

  • 90 is 4.6 points above the 85.4 average among 1,237 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

90 +4.1 pts vs 85.9

  • 90 is 4.1 points above the 85.9 average among 1,203 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Dodd City School is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.4 average for 1,237 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 388th of 1,237 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDodd City School 8386848990 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9085.4 1,237 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8985.4 1,212 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8483.8 1,195 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8684.3 1,181 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8386.0 1,164 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,203 reporting
  • School Progress83 B−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,200 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,190 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,179 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,200 reporting
  • Dodd City School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,237 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance83B7

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,203 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,203 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,203 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,202 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,202 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,202 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,199 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,199 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,199 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,102 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,102 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,102 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,237 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
90.0%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria90.0%89.3%+0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course80.0%63.0%+17.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA35.0%37.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%16.1%−16.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course30.0%37.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification15.0%36.2%−21.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.0%−1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness10.0%2.7%+7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.0%7.1%−2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces10.0%3.2%+6.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
319
Economically disadvantaged
36.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.3%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.4%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.3%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Dodd City School

Hispanic: 13.2%White: 84%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • Hispanic 13.2%
  • White 84%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,237 reporting for every category shown · 1,237 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 33.2%White: 47.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.6%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 33.2%
  • White 47.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
319
Economically disadvantaged students
117
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
62

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
289
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 319 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (3.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
319

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+11

Increase · +3.6%

Change since 2021–22
−9

Decrease · −2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
319
Selected comparison
736.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,210 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Dodd City School
School yearStudents enrolledDodd City SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 328 First available year 747.3
2022–23 331 Increase of 3 (0.9%) 748.7
2023–24 320 Decrease of 11 (3.3%) 749.1
2024–25 308 Decrease of 12 (3.8%) 744.2
2025–26 319 Increase of 11 (3.6%) 736.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27

8.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
45

13.51 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
333

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.1%
Selected comparison
10.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 960 rated schools reporting

−2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
13.51
Selected comparison
22

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,039 rated schools reporting

−8.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Dodd City School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 358 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 354 37 10.4% 62 17.51 10.4% 21.9
2022–23 341 34 10.0% 55 16.13 10.9% 23.3
2023–24 333 25 7.5% 37 11.11 10.6% 23.5
2024–25 333 27 8.1% 45 13.51 10.2% 22
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Dodd City School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 27 8.1% 45 13.51 10.2% 22
In-school suspensions 27 8.1% 39 11.71 9.2% 16.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Dodd City School
  • Parent district: Dodd City ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,692
Selected comparison
$11,844

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,212 rated schools reporting

+$3,849 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,692 per student for this campus, $16,941 per student for its parent district, Dodd City ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDodd City SchoolParent district: Dodd City ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,966$10,160$13,054$7,684 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,106 rated schools reporting
2019$7,984$11,421$13,108$7,822 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,123 rated schools reporting
2020$10,089$14,452$14,058$8,155 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,129 rated schools reporting
2021$10,751$12,928$14,797$8,625 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,146 rated schools reporting
2022$13,058$14,160$15,708$9,803 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,163 rated schools reporting
2023$13,603$14,696$16,792$10,395 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,182 rated schools reporting
2024$14,276$15,445$18,125$11,575 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,195 rated schools reporting
2025$15,692$16,941$18,972$11,844 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,212 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,464−$205 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−20.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.4−2.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Dodd City School

6 to 10 years: 10.7%11 to 20 years: 28.6%21 to 30 years: 41.1%Over 30 years: 19.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 41.1%
  • Over 30 years 19.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,237 reporting for every category shown · 1,237 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 23%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.4%21 to 30 years: 17.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Dodd City School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDodd City School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2218.4
Grade 112.518.9
Grade 220.319.2
Grade 312.619.8
Grade 4419.5
Grade 52321
Grade 616.218.4
Secondary English13.916.1
Secondary math14.717.1
Secondary science15.418.6
Secondary social studies13.918.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 20

    Attendance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

4 measures

  • 2of 20

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Student Achievement

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

20 measures

  • 4of 21

    Per-student spending

    Fannin County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 4of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 4of 18

    Science — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 183

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 183 that report this measure

  • 5of 183

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 183 that report this measure

  • 5of 21

    Overall score

    Fannin County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 20

    Math — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 18

    Science — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    Math — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 18

    Science — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 8of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 20

    Relative Performance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 20

    School Progress

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 074904001.