Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
8.3% −13.4 pts vs 21.7%
- 8.3% is 13.4 percentage points lower than the 21.7% average among 2,180 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Dillman Elem
Bailey County · Region 17: Lubbock · 380 students
- Current score
- 74/1002025-26
- Change
- −5 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −3.4 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,284 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,471 of 2,284tied with 76 others
- Score vs region
- −7.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
- Region 17: Lubbock placement
- 137 of 182tied with 10 others
- Score vs county
- −4.0 ptsvs 78 average · 4 rated schools in Bailey County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −6.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 3,783 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 2,754 of 3,783tied with 111 others
- Score vs state
- −7.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,844 of 7,646tied with 207 others
C74
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.4 average for 2,284 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is below the 78 average for 4 rated schools in Bailey County.The current score is below the 80.2 average for 3,783 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95.5% +2.3 pts vs 93.2%
- 95.5% is 2.3 percentage points above the 93.2% average among 2,186 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 17: Lubbock average
8.3% −8.2 pts vs 16.5%
- 8.3% is 8.2 percentage points lower than the 16.5% average among 178 schools in Region 17: Lubbock reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 17: Lubbock average
95.5% +1.3 pts vs 94.2%
- 95.5% is 1.3 percentage points above the 94.2% average among 178 schools in Region 17: Lubbock reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Bailey County.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
8.3% −7.4 pts vs 15.7%
- 8.3% is 7.4 percentage points lower than the 15.7% average among 3,639 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
95.5% +1.1 pts vs 94.4%
- 95.5% is 1.1 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 3,642 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
8.3% −8.4 pts vs 16.7%
- 8.3% is 8.4 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.5% +1.4 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.5% is 1.4 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Dillman Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.4 average for 2,284 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,471st of 2,284 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).
Dillman Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 137th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 10 others).
Dillman Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78 average for 4 rated schools in Bailey County. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Dillman Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 3,783 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,754th of 3,783 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 111 others).
Dillman Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5,844th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 207 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 74 | 77.4 2,284 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 75 | 77.1 2,271 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 75 | 74.2 2,255 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 69 | 74.6 2,241 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 79 | 81.8 2,220 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Dillman Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,284 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 380
- Economically disadvantaged
- 83.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 45.5%+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 11.3%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.5%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 8.3%−13.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Dillman Elem
- Hispanic 87.6%
- White 11.8%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,284 reporting for every category shown · 2,284 in full cohort
- African American 14.5%
- Hispanic 71.5%
- White 10%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
- African American 5%
- Hispanic 61%
- White 30.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison average For Bailey County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 88.2%
- White 11%
- Asian 0.5%
- Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,783 reporting for every category shown · 3,783 in full cohort
- African American 11.6%
- Hispanic 54.6%
- White 27.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 380
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 319
- Emergent bilingual students
- 173
- Special education students
- 43
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 13
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 217
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 380 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 20 (5.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 380
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −20
Decrease · −5.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- −6
Decrease · −1.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 380
- Selected comparison
- 615.2
| School year | Students enrolledDillman Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 386 | First available year | 646.8 |
| 2022–23 | 403 | Increase of 17 (4.4%) | 645.9 |
| 2023–24 | 391 | Decrease of 12 (3.0%) | 639.1 |
| 2024–25 | 400 | Increase of 9 (2.3%) | 635.9 |
| 2025–26 | 380 | Decrease of 20 (5.0%) | 615.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 419
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 388 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 425 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 429 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 419 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 419 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Dillman Elem
- Parent district: Muleshoe ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $7,576
- Selected comparison
- $13,260
For 2025, TEA reported $7,576 per student for this campus, $15,291 per student for its parent district, Muleshoe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Dillman Elem | Parent district: Muleshoe ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,506 | $12,441 | $13,054 | $8,258 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,158 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,874 | $12,731 | $13,108 | $8,343 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,185 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,382 | $13,791 | $14,058 | $8,854 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,196 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,902 | $15,484 | $14,797 | $9,561 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,203 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,161 | $15,883 | $15,708 | $11,031 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,171 | $19,438 | $16,792 | $11,499 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,240 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $8,107 | $17,880 | $18,125 | $12,445 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,254 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $7,576 | $15,291 | $18,972 | $13,260 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,269 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $49,190−$18,333 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 27−15.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14.1−0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Dillman Elem
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 40.7%
- 6 to 10 years 22.2%
- 11 to 20 years 22.2%
- 21 to 30 years 3.7%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,284 reporting for every category shown · 2,284 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 27.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.3%
- 21 to 30 years 15%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 25.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison average For Bailey County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.7%
- 1 to 5 years 34.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 18.6%
- 21 to 30 years 13.1%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,783 reporting for every category shown · 3,783 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.5%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classDillman Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 18.4 | 18 |
| Grade 1 | 17 | 18.4 |
| Grade 2 | 17.6 | 18.4 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 16 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
-
108of 2,180
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,180 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 009901103.