Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

De La Paz MS

Kleberg County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 101 students

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+8.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
368 of 1,928tied with 66 others
B89

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 7 points

82 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 8.1 points above the 80.9 average among 1,928 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 14 points

69 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 3.5 points above the 79.5 average among 1,842 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 50% avg · +1 pts
Masters
22%vs 20.7% avg · +1.3 pts

Among 1,849 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

De La Paz MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 368th of 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDe La Paz MS 82788289 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8980.9 1,928 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8280.7 1,902 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7878.7 1,882 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8279.3 1,849 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,849 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,825 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+12.4 vs similar economic context · 1,791 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
  • De La Paz MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,928 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,928 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
101
Economically disadvantaged
59.4%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.0%−11.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.5%+8.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

De La Paz MS

African American: 2%Hispanic: 73.3%White: 21.8%Asian: 1%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 2%
  • Hispanic 73.3%
  • White 21.8%
  • Asian 1%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting for every category shown · 1,928 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 47.5%White: 35.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 47.5%
  • White 35.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
101
Economically disadvantaged students
60
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
20

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
106
TEA-published mobility rate
10.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 101 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
101

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
0

No change

Change since 2022–23
−7

Decrease · −6.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
101
Selected comparison
631

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for De La Paz MS
School yearStudents enrolledDe La Paz MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 108 First available year 642.3
2023–24 113 Increase of 5 (4.6%) 641.1
2024–25 101 Decrease of 12 (10.6%) 639
2025–26 101 No change 631

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
106

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for De La Paz MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 120 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 118 Suppressed — 13 11.02 — 29.7
2024–25 106 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for De La Paz MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20232025
  • De La Paz MS
  • Parent district: Riviera ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,564
Selected comparison
$12,432

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 rated schools reporting

−$3,868 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,564 per student for this campus, $18,007 per student for its parent district, Riviera ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDe La Paz MSParent district: Riviera ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$8,731$17,959$16,792$11,068 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 rated schools reporting
2024$7,294$16,583$18,125$11,869 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2025$8,564$18,007$18,972$12,432 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,412−$4,068 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−32.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.4−7.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

De La Paz MS

Beginning: 3.4%1 to 5 years: 40.4%6 to 10 years: 4.5%11 to 20 years: 12.4%21 to 30 years: 4.5%Over 30 years: 34.8%
  • Beginning 3.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 40.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 4.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 12.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.5%
  • Over 30 years 34.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting for every category shown · 1,928 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.3%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for De La Paz MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDe La Paz MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 612.617.5
Secondary English20.814.8
Secondary languages other than English20.517.3
Secondary math16.815.6
Secondary science21.517.1
Secondary social studies21.517

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 12

    Academic Growth

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 3of 12

    Closing the Gaps

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

17 measures

  • 4of 12

    Reading — Meets

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 12

    Overall score

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 5of 12

    School Progress

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 5of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 12

    Student Achievement

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Relative Performance

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    All Subjects — Meets

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Math — Approaches

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Math — Meets

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Math — Masters

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Science — Approaches

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Science — Meets

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Science — Masters

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Attendance

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 12

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Kleberg County · of the 12 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 137903042.