Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Dayton HS

Liberty County · Region 04: Houston · 1,667 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+23 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.8 ptsvs 79.2 average · 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
311 of 2,019tied with 64 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.2 average for 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

83 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 89 is 9.8 points above the 79.2 average among 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 7 points

83 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 9.8 points above the 80.2 average among 1,896 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
64%vs 43.4% avg · +20.6 pts
Masters
27%vs 18.9% avg · +8.1 pts

Among 1,749 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Dayton HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.2 average for 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 23 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 311th of 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDayton HS 6681708389 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8979.2 2,019 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8379.0 1,999 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7076.8 1,983 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8177.3 1,954 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6682.0 1,935 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+9.8 vs similar economic context · 1,903 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+9.8 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps88 B+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,883 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,835 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • Dayton HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps88B2
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance90A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 889 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 889 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 889 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.6%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.8%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
95.3%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.3%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+9.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria97.0%87.4%+9.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course63.2%59.7%+3.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA15.4%26.6%−11.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)13.5%11.2%+2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course21.6%33.3%−11.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification45.2%37.0%+8.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate5.1%2.1%+3.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.2%−7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit9.6%4.2%+5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.8%3.4%−0.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.0%8.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.2%3.0%+1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
319

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
124

38.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
179

56.1% of graduates

Not trackable
16

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
319
Selected comparison
245.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
124
Selected comparison
106.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
38.9%
Selected comparison
43.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
56.1%
Selected comparison
50.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

+5.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
5.0%
Selected comparison
5.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−0.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LEE COLLEGE (003583)61
  2. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE (029137)16
  3. LAMAR UNIVERSITY (003581)9

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,667
Economically disadvantaged
69.4%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.5%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.2%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.4%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
26.7%+9.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Dayton HS

African American: 6.7%Hispanic: 54.5%White: 35.7%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 0.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 6.7%
  • Hispanic 54.5%
  • White 35.7%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 0.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

African American: 12.3%Hispanic: 56.2%White: 25.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 12.3%
  • Hispanic 56.2%
  • White 25.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,665
Economically disadvantaged students
1,156
Emergent bilingual students
324
Special education students
236

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
253
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,800
TEA-published mobility rate
14.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,667 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (0.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,667

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−7

Decrease · −0.4%

Change since 2021–22
+86

Increase · +5.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,667
Selected comparison
638.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Dayton HS
School yearStudents enrolledDayton HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,581 First available year 651.1
2022–23 1,633 Increase of 52 (3.3%) 658.2
2023–24 1,647 Increase of 14 (0.9%) 656.9
2024–25 1,674 Increase of 27 (1.6%) 654.3
2025–26 1,667 Decrease of 7 (0.4%) 638.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
415

23.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
1,107

62.16 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,781

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
23.3%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 rated schools reporting

+10.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
62.16
Selected comparison
30.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting

+31.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Dayton HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,568 297 18.9% 1,018 64.92 9.6% 19.2
2021–22 1,653 438 26.5% 1,394 84.33 12.9% 30.3
2022–23 1,708 355 20.8% 1,083 63.41 13.4% 32.3
2023–24 1,731 410 23.7% 1,192 68.86 13.2% 32.1
2024–25 1,781 415 23.3% 1,107 62.16 13.0% 30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Dayton HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 415 23.3% 1,107 62.16 13.0% 30.8
In-school suspensions 348 19.5% 797 44.75 11.6% 23.4
Out-of-school suspensions 95 5.3% 126 7.07 7.4% 11.1
DAEP placements 143 8.0% 183 10.28 5.2% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 94 5.3% 111 6.23 3.7% 4.3
Discretionary DAEP placements 60 3.4% 72 4.04 2.9% 3.4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Dayton HS
  • Parent district: Dayton ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,829
Selected comparison
$13,203

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,998 rated schools reporting

−$4,374 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,829 per student for this campus, $13,680 per student for its parent district, Dayton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDayton HSParent district: Dayton ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,710$10,617$13,054$8,011 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,862 rated schools reporting
2019$7,901$10,935$13,108$8,170 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2020$8,797$10,885$14,058$8,726 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2021$8,896$11,709$14,797$9,220 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
2022$9,045$12,717$15,708$10,472 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 rated schools reporting
2023$9,326$13,418$16,792$11,125 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,956 rated schools reporting
2024$9,469$13,857$18,125$12,387 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2025$8,829$13,680$18,972$13,203 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,998 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,124+$1,667 vs similar economic context
Teachers
97+54.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.1+3.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Dayton HS

Beginning: 8.1%1 to 5 years: 32.3%6 to 10 years: 27.2%11 to 20 years: 23.1%21 to 30 years: 9.3%
  • Beginning 8.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 32.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 23.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.4%1 to 5 years: 26.8%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.6%21 to 30 years: 15.5%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.5%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Dayton HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDayton HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English23.615.2
Secondary languages other than English26.717.9
Secondary math23.316.2
Secondary science26.217.5
Secondary social studies23.717.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 29

    School Progress

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 2of 29

    Relative Performance

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 2of 28

    Academic Growth

    Liberty County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 3of 32

    Overall score

    Liberty County · of the 32 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 29

    All Subjects — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 29

    Math — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 4of 29

    Closing the Gaps

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 4of 29

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 4of 29

    Math — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 5of 29

    Science — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 29

    Science — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 5of 29

    Science — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 15

    Social Studies — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    Social Studies — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 29

    Student Achievement

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 7of 29

    Reading — Meets

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 8of 29

    Math — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 29

    All Subjects — Masters

    Liberty County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 146902002.