2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Identified
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 1 · Title I campus
Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Open-enrollment charter campus
Burnham Wood Charter School District · San Antonio · 114 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
At a glance
The current score is below the 81.3 average for 199 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.5 average for 140 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Davinci Acad for Sci and the Arts at San Antonio is rated F by TEA, scoring 45 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 199 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 199th of 199 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.
Davinci Acad for Sci and the Arts at San Antonio is rated F by TEA, scoring 45 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.5 average for 140 similarly sized rated charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 139th of 140 similarly sized rated charter campuses.
Davinci Acad for Sci and the Arts at San Antonio is rated F by TEA, scoring 45 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.
Put the numbers in context
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Official support label: Comprehensive Identified
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 1 · Title I campus
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | F | 45 | 81.3 199 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 49 | F | 11 |
| School Progress | 52 | F | 8 |
| Closing the Gaps | 30 | F | 30 |
| Academic Growth | 52 | F | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 51 | F | 9 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 8 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (52), so Student Achievement (49) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 52.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Davinci Acad for Sci and the Arts at San Antonio
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 reporting for every category shown · 199 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Davinci Acad for Sci and the Arts at San Antonio
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 reporting for every category shown · 199 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071801005.