Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

David G Sanchez Elem

Cameron County · Region 01: Edinburg · 374 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
542 of 2,068tied with 77 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 40.5% avg · +10.5 pts
Masters
22%vs 16.1% avg · +5.9 pts

Among 1,918 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 38.8% avg · +12.2 pts
Masters
22%vs 15% avg · +7 pts

Among 1,913 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 44.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Masters
19%vs 17.7% avg · +1.3 pts

Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

David G Sanchez Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 542nd of 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDavid G Sanchez Elem 9081889485 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8577.6 2,068 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9477.3 2,050 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8873.8 2,032 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8173.3 2,026 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9081.9 2,001 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,918 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,915 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,903 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,914 reporting
  • David G Sanchez Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,068 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,806 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,068 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
374
Economically disadvantaged
92.8%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.8%−33.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.9%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.7%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.3%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

David G Sanchez Elem

African American: 1.1%Hispanic: 96.3%White: 2.4%American Indian: 0.3%
  • African American 1.1%
  • Hispanic 96.3%
  • White 2.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 reporting for every category shown · 2,068 in full cohort

African American: 14.9%Hispanic: 76.4%White: 5.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 14.9%
  • Hispanic 76.4%
  • White 5.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
374
Economically disadvantaged students
347
Emergent bilingual students
29
Special education students
67

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
34
Students in TEA mobility denominator
246
TEA-published mobility rate
13.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 352 students in 2023–24.

Latest available PEIMS enrollment
352

2023–24

Change since 2021–22
+1

Increase · +0.3%

Enrollment in 2023–24

This school
352
Selected comparison
601.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for David G Sanchez Elem
School yearStudents enrolledDavid G Sanchez ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 351 First available year 615
2022–23 337 Decrease of 14 (4.0%) 611.2
2023–24 352 Increase of 15 (4.5%) 601.5
2024–25 Not reported Not available —
2025–26 Not reported Not available —

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
375

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for David G Sanchez Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 413 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 385 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 362 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 381 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 375 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for David G Sanchez Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • David G Sanchez Elem
  • Parent district: La Feria ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,567
Selected comparison
$13,246

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 rated schools reporting

−$4,679 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,567 per student for this campus, $15,218 per student for its parent district, La Feria ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDavid G Sanchez ElemParent district: La Feria ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,919$14,053$13,054$8,315 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting
2019$6,710$11,990$13,108$8,338 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting
2020$7,787$12,674$14,058$8,839 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting
2021$7,996$13,076$14,797$9,654 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2022$9,881$15,964$15,708$11,232 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2023$9,410$16,674$16,792$11,750 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
2024$8,472$16,621$18,125$12,675 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,035 rated schools reporting
2025$8,567$15,218$18,972$13,246 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,542−$3,772 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−15.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15+0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

David G Sanchez Elem

1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 40%21 to 30 years: 12%Over 30 years: 4%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 40%
  • 21 to 30 years 12%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 reporting for every category shown · 2,068 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for David G Sanchez Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classDavid G Sanchez Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.518.1
Grade 116.318.3
Grade 217.318.3
Grade 31718.5
Grade 418.718.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 031905106.