Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cushing School

Nacogdoches County · Region 07: Kilgore · 294 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
708 of 1,786tied with 74 others
B84

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 4 points

80 to 84 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 84 is 2.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,786 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 8 points

78 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 5.4 points above the 80.6 average among 1,718 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
70%vs 50.3% avg · +19.7 pts
Masters
31%vs 23.4% avg · +7.6 pts

Among 1,578 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cushing School is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 708th of 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCushing School 8376788084 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8481.2 1,786 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8081.4 1,762 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7879.3 1,736 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7680.0 1,709 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8383.0 1,684 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,718 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,711 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps80 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • Academic Growth57 F−18.0 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,711 reporting
  • Cushing School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,786 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps80B10
Academic Growth57F3
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,786 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
93.0%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria93.0%88.1%+4.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course32.5%58.5%−26.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA32.5%28.2%+4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course27.5%33.5%−6.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification70.0%38.6%+31.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.9%−4.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness5.0%3.2%+1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student12.5%7.7%+4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces5.0%3.5%+1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
35

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
12

34.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
23

65.7% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
35
Selected comparison
219.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
12
Selected comparison
95.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
34.3%
Selected comparison
45.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−10.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
65.7%
Selected comparison
50.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

+15.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIV (003624)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
294
Economically disadvantaged
54.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.1%−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.7%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cushing School

African American: 6.1%Hispanic: 20.4%White: 68.4%American Indian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 6.1%
  • Hispanic 20.4%
  • White 68.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting for every category shown · 1,786 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 43.6%White: 39.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 43.6%
  • White 39.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
294
Economically disadvantaged students
159
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
49

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
41
Students in TEA mobility denominator
319
TEA-published mobility rate
12.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 294 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (1.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
294

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −1.3%

Change since 2021–22
−2

Decrease · −0.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
294
Selected comparison
633.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cushing School
School yearStudents enrolledCushing SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 296 First available year 636.7
2022–23 293 Decrease of 3 (1.0%) 642.5
2023–24 294 Increase of 1 (0.3%) 642.4
2024–25 298 Increase of 4 (1.4%) 639.2
2025–26 294 Decrease of 4 (1.3%) 633.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
319

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cushing School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 327 11 3.4% 12 3.67 9.7% 19
2021–22 320 10 3.1% 12 3.75 12.3% 27.7
2022–23 309 13 4.2% 14 4.53 12.8% 29.5
2023–24 314 10 3.2% 11 3.50 12.7% 29.5
2024–25 319 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cushing School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Cushing School
  • Parent district: Cushing ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,305
Selected comparison
$12,195

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 rated schools reporting

+$110 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,305 per student for this campus, $16,657 per student for its parent district, Cushing ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCushing SchoolParent district: Cushing ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,227$12,451$13,054$7,877 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 rated schools reporting
2019$8,854$12,512$13,108$8,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,639 rated schools reporting
2020$9,745$13,068$14,058$8,631 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
2021$8,982$13,373$14,797$9,013 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting
2022$9,407$15,195$15,708$10,344 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting
2023$11,585$16,411$16,792$10,845 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,709 rated schools reporting
2024$12,168$17,567$18,125$11,737 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 rated schools reporting
2025$12,305$16,657$18,972$12,195 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,237+$6,661 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−13.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.5−9.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cushing School

Beginning: 1.8%1 to 5 years: 4.7%6 to 10 years: 18.6%11 to 20 years: 31.9%21 to 30 years: 36.2%Over 30 years: 7.2%
  • Beginning 1.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 4.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 36.2%
  • Over 30 years 7.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting for every category shown · 1,786 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cushing School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCushing School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 614.717.6
Secondary English12.914.8
Secondary languages other than English9.617.4
Secondary math12.415.7
Secondary science15.217.3
Secondary social studies13.717.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 23

    Science — Meets

    Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 6of 24

    Per-student spending

    Nacogdoches County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 6of 23

    Science — Masters

    Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 7of 23

    Science — Approaches

    Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Social Studies — Masters

    Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 23

    Student Achievement

    Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 14

    Social Studies — Meets

    Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 174902001.