TEA did not issue an overall rating for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
24.5%−1.2 pts vs 25.7%
24.5% is 1.2 percentage points lower than
the 25.7% average among 215 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against similarly sized charter campuses.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Texas charter average.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 74 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (219 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
—
Not rated
—
School Progress
—
Not rated
—
Closing the Gaps
—
Not rated
—
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
—
Not rated
—
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for
this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but
applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
327
Economically disadvantaged
71.9%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.2%−17.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
4.9%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.6%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.5%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
African American 26.3%
Hispanic 33.9%
White 26.9%
Asian 3.1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 9.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 reporting for every category shown · 219 in full cohort
African American 19.5%
Hispanic 65.4%
White 8.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 270 reporting for every category shown · 270 in full cohort
African American 20.4%
Hispanic 58.7%
White 12.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
327
Economically disadvantaged students
235
Emergent bilingual students
40
Special education students
16
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
43
Students in TEA mobility denominator
257
TEA-published mobility rate
16.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 327 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 132 (28.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
327
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−132
Decrease · −28.8%
Change since 2021–22
−302
Decrease · −48.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
327
Selected comparison
503.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
School year
Students enrolledCumberland Academy Lower Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
629
First available year
482.7
2022–23
511
Decrease of 118 (18.8%)
497.9
2023–24
432
Decrease of 79 (15.5%)
493.6
2024–25
459
Increase of 27 (6.3%)
502.1
2025–26
327
Decrease of 132 (28.8%)
503.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
2.24 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
490
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.24
Selected comparison
15.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 160 rated charter campuses reporting
−13.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
655
47
7.2%
79
12.06
3.8%
4.9
2021–22
647
27
4.2%
42
6.49
9.7%
15.4
2022–23
542
21
3.9%
56
10.33
10.5%
17.2
2023–24
477
13
2.7%
23
4.82
10.4%
17.2
2024–25
490
Suppressed
—
11
2.24
—
15.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
2.24
—
15.7
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
2.04
—
7.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
Parent district: Cumberland Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,331
Selected comparison
$11,439
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated charter campuses reporting
−$3,108 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,331 per student for this campus, $12,462 per student for its parent district, Cumberland Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
Parent district: Cumberland Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,911
$7,814
$13,054
$8,095
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$6,597
$8,582
$13,108
$8,623
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 155 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$7,017
$9,803
$14,058
$9,426
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 169 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$7,556
$10,710
$14,797
$9,379
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 184 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$7,974
$11,763
$15,708
$10,669
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$9,877
$12,635
$16,792
$11,131
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$10,656
$13,530
$18,125
$11,653
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 205 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$8,331
$12,462
$18,972
$11,439
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$53,382−$9,001 vs similar economic context
Teachers
18−12.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.7+0.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Cumberland Academy Lower Elem
Beginning 11.4%
1 to 5 years 54.3%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 11.4%
21 to 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 reporting for every category shown · 219 in full cohort
Beginning 13.8%
1 to 5 years 45.8%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 15.7%
21 to 30 years 3.9%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 270 reporting for every category shown · 270 in full cohort
Beginning 12.6%
1 to 5 years 42.2%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 16.1%
21 to 30 years 5.5%
Over 30 years 1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cumberland Academy Lower Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCumberland Academy Lower Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.5
20.9
Grade 1
24.3
22.6
Grade 2
21.3
24
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212801101.