Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Crowell School

Foard County · Region 09: Wichita Falls · 172 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
406 of 1,786tied with 71 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 45.1% avg · +5.9 pts
Masters
21%vs 18% avg · +3 pts

Among 1,707 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +6.8 pts vs 81.2

  • 88 is 6.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,786 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

89 +10.6 pts vs 78.4

  • 89 is 10.6 points above the 78.4 average among 1,696 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Crowell School is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 406th of 1,786 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCrowell School 8683859188 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8881.2 1,786 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9181.4 1,762 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8579.3 1,736 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8380.0 1,709 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8683.0 1,684 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,718 reporting
  • School Progress84 B+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,711 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps89 B+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • Academic Growth60 D−15.0 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
  • Relative Performance84 B+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,711 reporting
  • Crowell School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,786 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress84B6
Closing the Gaps89B1
Academic Growth60D10
Relative Performance84B6

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so School Progress (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,718 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,716 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,578 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 895 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,786 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
91.7%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%88.1%+11.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course22.2%58.5%−36.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA22.2%28.2%−6.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course55.6%33.5%+22.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification77.8%38.6%+39.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.9%−4.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness11.1%3.2%+7.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student22.2%7.7%+14.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.5%−3.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
172
Economically disadvantaged
54.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−14.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.3%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.1%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Crowell School

African American: 1.2%Hispanic: 37.2%White: 55.2%Two or More Races: 6.4%
  • African American 1.2%
  • Hispanic 37.2%
  • White 55.2%
  • Two or More Races 6.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting for every category shown · 1,786 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 43.6%White: 39.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 43.6%
  • White 39.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
172
Economically disadvantaged students
93
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
35

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
157
TEA-published mobility rate
11.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 172 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 17 (9.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
172

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−17

Decrease · −9.0%

Change since 2021–22
−20

Decrease · −10.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
172
Selected comparison
633.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Crowell School
School yearStudents enrolledCrowell SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 192 First available year 636.7
2022–23 197 Increase of 5 (2.6%) 642.5
2023–24 196 Decrease of 1 (0.5%) 642.4
2024–25 189 Decrease of 7 (3.6%) 639.2
2025–26 172 Decrease of 17 (9.0%) 633.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
13

6.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
23

11.56 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
199

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.5%
Selected comparison
12.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 rated schools reporting

−5.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
11.56
Selected comparison
27.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,489 rated schools reporting

−16.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Crowell School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 216 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 213 Suppressed — 14 6.57 — 27.7
2022–23 210 13 6.2% 30 14.29 12.8% 29.5
2023–24 200 Suppressed — 16 8.00 — 29.5
2024–25 199 13 6.5% 23 11.56 12.4% 27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Crowell School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 13 6.5% 23 11.56 12.4% 27.8
In-school suspensions 13 6.5% 19 9.55 11.2% 21.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$28k$48k20182020202220242025
  • Crowell School
  • Parent district: Crowell ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,052
Selected comparison
$12,195

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 rated schools reporting

−$1,143 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,052 per student for this campus, $28,938 per student for its parent district, Crowell ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCrowell SchoolParent district: Crowell ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,525$15,765$13,054$7,877 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 rated schools reporting
2019$9,415$15,896$13,108$8,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,639 rated schools reporting
2020$9,536$14,646$14,058$8,631 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
2021$11,091$21,613$14,797$9,013 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting
2022$12,824$31,141$15,708$10,344 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting
2023$10,961$45,962$16,792$10,845 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,709 rated schools reporting
2024$11,194$29,622$18,125$11,737 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 rated schools reporting
2025$11,052$28,938$18,972$12,195 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,738+$1,162 vs similar economic context
Teachers
19−23.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.2−10.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Crowell School

1 to 5 years: 10.6%6 to 10 years: 15.4%11 to 20 years: 31.9%21 to 30 years: 30.9%Over 30 years: 10.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 10.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 30.9%
  • Over 30 years 10.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting for every category shown · 1,786 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Crowell School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCrowell School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1918
Grade 1818.3
Grade 21218.5
Grade 31518.8
Grade 4919
Grade 513.319.8
Grade 610.917.6
Secondary English11.114.8
Secondary languages other than English1917.4
Secondary math14.315.7
Secondary science14.317.3
Secondary social studies10.817.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 37

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 3of 37

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 5of 37

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 9of 37

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 37 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 078901001.