Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cross Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 870 students

Current score
76/1002025-26
Change
−12 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
−1.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,325 of 2,273tied with 76 others
C76

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 77.5 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
45%vs 41.3% avg · +3.7 pts
Masters
18%vs 16.1% avg · +1.9 pts

Among 2,105 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
43%vs 37.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Masters
16%vs 14.2% avg · +1.8 pts

Among 2,094 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 45.6% avg · +3.4 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.9% avg · +3.1 pts

Among 2,104 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cross Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.5 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 1,325th of 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCross Elem 888876 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7677.5 2,273 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8877.1 2,259 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8874.3 2,242 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C+0.5 vs similar economic context · 2,105 reporting
  • School Progress80 B+1.4 vs similar economic context · 2,098 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps66 D−8.6 vs similar economic context · 2,083 reporting
  • Academic Growth66 D−6.3 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 2,098 reporting
  • Cross Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,273 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps66D4
Academic Growth66D4
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,273 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
870
Economically disadvantaged
83.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
42.9%+10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.3%−11.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cross Elem

African American: 28.2%Hispanic: 64.9%White: 4.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 28.2%
  • Hispanic 64.9%
  • White 4.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,273 reporting for every category shown · 2,273 in full cohort

African American: 14.4%Hispanic: 71.1%White: 10.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 14.4%
  • Hispanic 71.1%
  • White 10.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
870
Economically disadvantaged students
726
Emergent bilingual students
373
Special education students
172

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
83
Students in TEA mobility denominator
633
TEA-published mobility rate
13.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 870 students in 2025–26, an increase of 67 (8.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
870

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+67

Increase · +8.3%

Change since 2023–24
+163

Increase · +23.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
870
Selected comparison
616.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,242 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cross Elem
School yearStudents enrolledCross ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 707 First available year 640
2024–25 803 Increase of 96 (13.6%) 636.8
2025–26 870 Increase of 67 (8.3%) 616.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
39

4.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
57

6.48 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
880

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting

−8.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.48
Selected comparison
32.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,704 rated schools reporting

−25.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cross Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 778 21 2.7% 51 6.56 13.8% 33.9
2024–25 880 39 4.4% 57 6.48 13.3% 32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cross Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 39 4.4% 57 6.48 13.3% 32.1
In-school suspensions 39 4.4% 53 6.02 11.7% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$14k$20k20242025
  • Cross Elem
  • Parent district: Mesquite ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,988
Selected comparison
$13,183

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,257 rated schools reporting

−$4,195 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,988 per student for this campus, $15,844 per student for its parent district, Mesquite ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCross ElemParent district: Mesquite ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$12,605$16,875$18,125$12,413 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,241 rated schools reporting
2025$8,988$15,844$18,972$13,183 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,257 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,245+$4,791 vs similar economic context
Teachers
52+9.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.9+2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cross Elem

Beginning: 0.8%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 30.5%11 to 20 years: 29.3%21 to 30 years: 11.7%
  • Beginning 0.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,273 reporting for every category shown · 2,273 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cross Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCross Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.318
Grade 118.418.4
Grade 221.518.4
Grade 317.818.8
Grade 423.718.9
Grade 52119.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057914134.