Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Crosby Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 654 students

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,774 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
571 of 1,774tied with 81 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,774 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 56.7% avg · +4.3 pts
Masters
27%vs 23.7% avg · +3.3 pts

Among 1,703 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

86 +4.6 pts vs 81.4

  • 86 is 4.6 points above the 81.4 average among 1,774 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

83 +4.4 pts vs 78.6

  • 83 is 4.4 points above the 78.6 average among 1,682 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Crosby Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,774 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 571st of 1,774 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 81 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCrosby Elem 8770698986 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8681.4 1,774 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8981.5 1,752 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6979.4 1,726 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7080.0 1,699 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8783.0 1,675 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement78 C−2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,705 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,698 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps83 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,682 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,657 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,698 reporting
  • Crosby Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,774 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement78C2
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps83B7
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,774 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
654
Economically disadvantaged
53.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.7%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.7%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.3%+4.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Crosby Elem

African American: 12.1%Hispanic: 47.9%White: 34.6%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 12.1%
  • Hispanic 47.9%
  • White 34.6%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,774 reporting for every category shown · 1,774 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 43.2%White: 39.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 43.2%
  • White 39.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
653
Economically disadvantaged students
350
Emergent bilingual students
44
Special education students
121

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
102
Students in TEA mobility denominator
734
TEA-published mobility rate
13.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 654 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 17 (2.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
654

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−17

Decrease · −2.5%

Change since 2021–22
−24

Decrease · −3.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
654
Selected comparison
637

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Crosby Elem
School yearStudents enrolledCrosby ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 678 First available year 639
2022–23 732 Increase of 54 (8.0%) 645.3
2023–24 705 Decrease of 27 (3.7%) 645.3
2024–25 671 Decrease of 34 (4.8%) 642.1
2025–26 654 Decrease of 17 (2.5%) 637

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
35

4.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
51

7.01 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
728

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.8%
Selected comparison
12.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 rated schools reporting

−7.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
7.01
Selected comparison
27.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,481 rated schools reporting

−20.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Crosby Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 707 14 2.0% 24 3.39 9.7% 18.9
2021–22 755 11 1.5% 17 2.25 12.3% 27.7
2022–23 803 36 4.5% 61 7.60 12.7% 29.4
2023–24 750 57 7.6% 80 10.67 12.7% 29.5
2024–25 728 35 4.8% 51 7.01 12.3% 27.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Crosby Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 35 4.8% 51 7.01 12.3% 27.6
In-school suspensions 27 3.7% 34 4.67 11.1% 21.4
Out-of-school suspensions 15 2.1% 16 2.20 6.3% 8.9
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Crosby Elem
  • Parent district: Crosby ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,655
Selected comparison
$12,168

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 rated schools reporting

−$3,513 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,655 per student for this campus, $19,154 per student for its parent district, Crosby ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCrosby ElemParent district: Crosby ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,989$12,734$13,054$7,890 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting
2019$5,835$10,660$13,108$8,070 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2020$6,902$10,691$14,058$8,617 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 rated schools reporting
2021$7,379$12,447$14,797$9,004 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,665 rated schools reporting
2022$7,585$11,751$15,708$10,301 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting
2023$7,586$12,922$16,792$10,850 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 rated schools reporting
2024$7,950$13,121$18,125$11,727 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 rated schools reporting
2025$8,655$19,154$18,972$12,168 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$79,307+$12,692 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−3.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.9−2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Crosby Elem

1 to 5 years: 17.1%6 to 10 years: 22%11 to 20 years: 43.8%21 to 30 years: 17.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 17.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 22%
  • 11 to 20 years 43.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,774 reporting for every category shown · 1,774 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Crosby Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCrosby Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 120.618.3
Grade 219.718.5
Grade 321.118.9
Grade 420.419
Grade 520.719.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101906106.