+5.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
211 of 1,091tied with 112 others
Score vs region
+10.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
Region 17: Lubbock placement
25 of 182tied with 8 others
Score vs county
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 84 rated schools in Lubbock County
Lubbock County placement
8 of 84tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,513 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
390 of 4,513tied with 173 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.8 average for 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,513 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
73%vs 63.3% avg · +9.7 pts
Masters
41%vs 31.2% avg · +9.8 pts
Among 1,066 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Crestview Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 211th of 1,091 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 112 others).
Crestview Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 8 others).
Crestview Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 84 rated schools in Lubbock County (tied with 3 others).
Crestview Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,513 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 390th of 4,513 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 173 others).
Crestview Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,066 reporting
School Progress91 A+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,063 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,055 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,045 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,063 reporting
Crestview Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,091 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
87
B
3
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Meets grade level73%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Masters grade level41%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Meets grade level74%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Masters grade level47%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Meets grade level74%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Masters grade level37%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 973 reporting
Meets grade level66%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 973 reporting
Masters grade level33%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 973 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,091 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
652
Economically disadvantaged
31.9%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.5%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.7%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.0%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Crestview Elem
African American 5.1%
Hispanic 37%
White 47%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 7.4%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 reporting for every category shown · 1,091 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 30.7%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 61%
White 30.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,513 reporting for every category shown · 4,513 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.2%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
649
Economically disadvantaged students
207
Emergent bilingual students
23
Special education students
102
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
45
Students in TEA mobility denominator
524
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 652 students in 2025–26, an increase of 43 (7.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
652
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+43
Increase · +7.1%
Change since 2021–22
+76
Increase · +13.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
652
Selected comparison
785
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,076 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Crestview Elem
School year
Students enrolledCrestview Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
576
First available year
796.8
2022–23
583
Increase of 7 (1.2%)
799.3
2023–24
585
Increase of 2 (0.3%)
796.8
2024–25
609
Increase of 24 (4.1%)
793.4
2025–26
652
Increase of 43 (7.1%)
785
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
35
5.43 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
645
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
9.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 rated schools reporting
−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.43
Selected comparison
19.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 rated schools reporting
−13.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Crestview Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
606
16
2.6%
18
2.97
7.4%
13.4
2021–22
603
13
2.2%
18
2.99
9.8%
19.8
2022–23
600
19
3.2%
28
4.67
9.9%
20.5
2023–24
601
12
2.0%
19
3.16
9.5%
20.4
2024–25
645
20
3.1%
35
5.43
9.3%
19.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Crestview Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
20
3.1%
35
5.43
9.3%
19.2
In-school suspensions
18
2.8%
31
4.81
8.3%
14.9
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Crestview Elem
Parent district: Frenship ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,179
Selected comparison
$11,774
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,070 rated schools reporting
−$3,595 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,179 per student for this campus, $21,893 per student for its parent district, Frenship ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Crestview Elem
Parent district: Frenship ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,943
$10,914
$13,054
$7,650
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,958
$10,823
$13,108
$7,801
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 982 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,110
$10,618
$14,058
$8,127
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 992 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,578
$12,442
$14,797
$8,550
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,004 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,153
$14,695
$15,708
$9,814
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,024 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,159
$20,343
$16,792
$10,336
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,042 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,982
$23,331
$18,125
$11,469
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,179
$21,893
$18,972
$11,774
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,070 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$62,303−$5,885 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−13.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.1+2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Crestview Elem
1 to 5 years 5.3%
6 to 10 years 34.2%
11 to 20 years 39.5%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 reporting for every category shown · 1,091 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,513 reporting for every category shown · 4,513 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Crestview Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCrestview Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20.2
18.5
Grade 1
18.9
19.1
Grade 2
21.2
19.5
Grade 3
20.5
20.2
Grade 4
18.4
19.8
Grade 5
20.5
21.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 82
Attendance
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure
3of 81
Math — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 173
All Subjects — Masters
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 173 that report this measure · tied with 3
4of 82
All Subjects — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 82
All Subjects — Approaches
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 82
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure
5of 80
Academic Growth
Lubbock County · of the 80 that report this measure
6of 82
Reading — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 81
Math — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 81
Math — Approaches
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152907104.