Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cranfills Gap School

Bosque County · Region 12: Waco · 116 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+10 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
437 of 1,930tied with 78 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 2 points

86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 8.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,853 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +7.1 pts vs 80.9

  • 88 is 7.1 points above the 80.9 average among 1,930 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

87 +8.8 pts vs 78.2

  • 87 is 8.8 points above the 78.2 average among 1,829 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cranfills Gap School is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 437th of 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCranfills Gap School 7876899188 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8880.9 1,930 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9180.8 1,903 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8978.8 1,882 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7679.4 1,850 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7882.7 1,824 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,853 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,846 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−16.5 vs similar economic context · 1,793 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,846 reporting
  • Cranfills Gap School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 948 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 498 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 498 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 505 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%88.0%+12.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course40.0%58.8%−18.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA40.0%28.4%+11.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.3%−10.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course40.0%34.5%+5.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification60.0%38.0%+22.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.1%−6.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.9%−3.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student20.0%7.7%+12.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.4%−3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 539 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
116
Economically disadvantaged
58.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.3%−11.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.7%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.1%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cranfills Gap School

African American: 2.6%Hispanic: 31.9%White: 62.9%Asian: 0.9%Two or More Races: 1.7%
  • African American 2.6%
  • Hispanic 31.9%
  • White 62.9%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 1.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 47%White: 36%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 47%
  • White 36%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
116
Economically disadvantaged students
68
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
17

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
112
TEA-published mobility rate
10.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 116 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
116

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
0

No change

Change since 2021–22
−16

Decrease · −12.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
116
Selected comparison
633.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cranfills Gap School
School yearStudents enrolledCranfills Gap SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 132 First available year 638.7
2022–23 126 Decrease of 6 (4.5%) 643.5
2023–24 128 Increase of 2 (1.6%) 642.4
2024–25 116 Decrease of 12 (9.4%) 639.8
2025–26 116 No change 633.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
11

9.17 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
120

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
9.17
Selected comparison
28.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,586 rated schools reporting

−19.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cranfills Gap School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 141 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 144 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 138 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 132 11 8.3% 12 9.09 12.8% 29.8
2024–25 120 Suppressed — 11 9.17 — 28.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cranfills Gap School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 11 9.17 — 28.2
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$29k$51k20182020202220242025
  • Cranfills Gap School
  • Parent district: Cranfills Gap ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$40,896
Selected comparison
$12,420

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting

+$28,476 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $40,896 per student for this campus, $48,268 per student for its parent district, Cranfills Gap ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCranfills Gap SchoolParent district: Cranfills Gap ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$13,170$15,012$13,054$7,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 rated schools reporting
2019$12,766$14,751$13,108$8,086 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2020$15,365$17,213$14,058$8,691 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2021$16,129$18,128$14,797$9,050 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 rated schools reporting
2022$17,853$18,868$15,708$10,434 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,826 rated schools reporting
2023$20,600$22,334$16,792$10,980 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2024$22,655$24,097$18,125$11,804 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2025$40,896$48,268$18,972$12,420 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$59,917−$6,552 vs similar economic context
Teachers
16−26.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.3−11.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cranfills Gap School

Beginning: 12%1 to 5 years: 12%6 to 10 years: 12%11 to 20 years: 21.5%21 to 30 years: 30.4%Over 30 years: 12%
  • Beginning 12%
  • 1 to 5 years 12%
  • 6 to 10 years 12%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 30.4%
  • Over 30 years 12%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cranfills Gap School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCranfills Gap School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten317.9
Grade 1818.2
Grade 2618.4
Grade 35.418.7
Grade 4418.9
Grade 5819.7
Grade 61117.5
Secondary English8.314.8
Secondary languages other than English16.517.3
Secondary math9.315.7
Secondary science1217.1
Secondary social studies9.117

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 13

    Per-student spending

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

10 measures

  • 2of 13

    Overall score

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 13

    Closing the Gaps

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Approaches

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Meets

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 13

    Math — Masters

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Attendance

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Student Achievement

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    School Progress

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 13

    Relative Performance

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 4of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 4of 13

    All Subjects — Meets

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 13

    Science — Meets

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 4of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Bosque County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Social Studies — Meets

    Bosque County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 13

    Math — Meets

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 13

    Science — Approaches

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Science — Masters

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 10

    Social Studies — Masters

    Bosque County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 13

    Academic Growth

    Bosque County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 24of 539

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 539 that report this measure · tied with 7

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 018908001.