Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cowan Elem

Travis County · Region 13: Austin · 551 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
−9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−3.2 ptsvs 88.2 average · 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
687 of 929tied with 25 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 88.2 average for 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 2 points

86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 3.3 points above the 84.7 average among 907 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

88 +6.6 pts vs 81.4

  • 88 is 6.6 points above the 81.4 average among 893 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cowan Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 88.2 average for 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 687th of 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCowan Elem 9490818585 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8588.2 929 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8588.1 917 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8186.8 903 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9087.1 887 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9488.3 871 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B−6.0 vs similar economic context · 909 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 907 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C−6.7 vs similar economic context · 902 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 893 reporting
  • Relative Performance67 D−12.9 vs similar economic context · 907 reporting
  • Cowan Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (929 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance67D3

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (929 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
551
Economically disadvantaged
26.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.6%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.1%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.7%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cowan Elem

African American: 2.2%Hispanic: 39.9%White: 45%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 5.6%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 6.7%
  • African American 2.2%
  • Hispanic 39.9%
  • White 45%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 5.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 6.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting for every category shown · 929 in full cohort

African American: 8.9%Hispanic: 28%White: 48.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 9.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 8.9%
  • Hispanic 28%
  • White 48.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 9.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
551
Economically disadvantaged students
146
Emergent bilingual students
53
Special education students
144

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
430
TEA-published mobility rate
4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 551 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
551

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −0.7%

Change since 2021–22
−33

Decrease · −5.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
551
Selected comparison
828.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 922 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cowan Elem
School yearStudents enrolledCowan ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 584 First available year 845.9
2022–23 544 Decrease of 40 (6.8%) 850.3
2023–24 546 Increase of 2 (0.4%) 844.7
2024–25 555 Increase of 9 (1.6%) 840.3
2025–26 551 Decrease of 4 (0.7%) 828.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
568

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cowan Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 665 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 610 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 572 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 561 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 568 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cowan Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$17k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Cowan Elem
  • Parent district: Austin ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,762
Selected comparison
$11,365

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting

+$397 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,762 per student for this campus, $26,839 per student for its parent district, Austin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCowan ElemParent district: Austin ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,646$13,757$13,054$7,563 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 820 rated schools reporting
2019$7,075$14,067$13,108$7,643 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 rated schools reporting
2020$7,281$16,747$14,058$7,958 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 845 rated schools reporting
2021$8,250$18,042$14,797$8,419 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 853 rated schools reporting
2022$13,225$18,220$15,708$9,647 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 870 rated schools reporting
2023$10,251$16,721$16,792$10,137 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 888 rated schools reporting
2024$11,299$19,064$18,125$11,311 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 902 rated schools reporting
2025$11,762$26,839$18,972$11,365 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,086−$2,323 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44−9.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.5−2.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cowan Elem

Beginning: 9%1 to 5 years: 36.7%6 to 10 years: 13.6%11 to 20 years: 18.1%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 6.8%
  • Beginning 9%
  • 1 to 5 years 36.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 6.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting for every category shown · 929 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.6%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 32.2%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cowan Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCowan Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2118.6
Grade 118.418.9
Grade 22119.6
Grade 319.520.5
Grade 42220.1
Grade 52421.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227901183.