Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Corrigan-Camden ElemB80vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Corrigan-Camden Elem
Polk County · Region 06: Huntsville · 366 students
Current score
80/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
970 of 2,025tied with 98 others
Score vs region
−0.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
168 of 314tied with 9 others
Score vs county
−0.8 ptsvs 80.8 average · 18 rated schools in Polk County
Polk County placement
8 of 18tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
−0.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,626 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,922 of 3,626tied with 143 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.1 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is below the 80.8 average for 18 rated schools in Polk County.The current score is level with the 80.3 average for 3,626 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
52%vs 46.3% avg · +5.7 pts
Masters
23%vs 18.6% avg · +4.4 pts
Among 1,909 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Corrigan-Camden Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 970th of 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 98 others).
Corrigan-Camden Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 168th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 9 others).
Corrigan-Camden Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.8 average for 18 rated schools in Polk County. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 18 rated schools in Polk County (tied with 1 other).
Corrigan-Camden Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.3 average for 3,626 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,922nd of 3,626 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 143 others).
Corrigan-Camden Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement77 C+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,909 reporting
School Progress83 B+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
Academic Growth68 D−5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,841 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
Corrigan-Camden Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
77
C
3
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
68
D
2
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level76%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Meets grade level52%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Masters grade level23%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Meets grade level56%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Masters grade level26%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Meets grade level51%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Meets grade level40%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
366
Economically disadvantaged
69.5%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−11.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.3%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Corrigan-Camden Elem
African American 15.9%
Hispanic 36.5%
White 38.7%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 7.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 56.2%
White 25.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Polk County · 18 reporting for every category shown · 18 in full cohort
African American 10.1%
Hispanic 31.2%
White 52%
American Indian 1.4%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,626 reporting for every category shown · 3,626 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
364
Economically disadvantaged students
253
Emergent bilingual students
32
Special education students
74
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
315
TEA-published mobility rate
7.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 366 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 31 (7.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
366
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−31
Decrease · −7.8%
Change since 2021–22
−36
Decrease · −9.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
366
Selected comparison
638.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Corrigan-Camden Elem
School year
Students enrolledCorrigan-Camden Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
402
First available year
651.1
2022–23
401
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
658.1
2023–24
392
Decrease of 9 (2.2%)
656.8
2024–25
397
Increase of 5 (1.3%)
654.1
2025–26
366
Decrease of 31 (7.8%)
638.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
18
4.27 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
422
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.27
Selected comparison
30.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,662 rated schools reporting
−26.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Corrigan-Camden Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
421
30
7.1%
44
10.45
9.6%
19.2
2021–22
433
34
7.8%
68
15.70
12.9%
30.3
2022–23
442
23
5.2%
38
8.60
13.4%
32.3
2023–24
439
18
4.1%
21
4.78
13.3%
32.2
2024–25
422
Suppressed
—
18
4.27
—
30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Corrigan-Camden Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
18
4.27
—
30.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
17
4.03
—
23.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Corrigan-Camden Elem
Parent district: Corrigan-Camden ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,134
Selected comparison
$13,216
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting
−$4,082 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,134 per student for this campus, $20,773 per student for its parent district, Corrigan-Camden ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Corrigan-Camden Elem
Parent district: Corrigan-Camden ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,804
$13,544
$13,054
$8,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,371
$15,337
$13,108
$8,168
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,765
$16,360
$14,058
$8,724
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,208
$16,522
$14,797
$9,218
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,126
$16,874
$15,708
$10,477
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,367
$19,898
$16,792
$11,153
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,510
$21,949
$18,125
$12,419
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,988 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,134
$20,773
$18,972
$13,216
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,740+$5,288 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−16.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.5−0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Corrigan-Camden Elem
Beginning 3.3%
1 to 5 years 16.4%
6 to 10 years 16.4%
11 to 20 years 22.7%
21 to 30 years 38.7%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Polk County · 18 reporting for every category shown · 18 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 22.1%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 25.6%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 9.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,626 reporting for every category shown · 3,626 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Corrigan-Camden Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCorrigan-Camden Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.6
18
Grade 1
21.5
18.2
Grade 2
17.4
18.4
Grade 3
19.5
18.6
Grade 4
13.4
18.9
Grade 5
17.2
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 17
All Subjects — Masters
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 16
Math — Masters
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
14 measures
4of 17
Reading — Masters
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure
4of 16
Math — Meets
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 17
All Subjects — Meets
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 18
Attendance
Polk County · of the 18 that report this measure
7of 17
Reading — Meets
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 16
School Progress
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure
7of 16
Relative Performance
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure
7of 16
Math — Approaches
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 18
Overall score
Polk County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 17
All Subjects — Approaches
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 17
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Polk County · of the 17 that report this measure
9of 16
Academic Growth
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 16
Science — Masters
Polk County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 18
Per-student spending
Polk County · of the 18 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 187904103.