Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Columbus JH

Colorado County · Region 04: Houston · 317 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
−12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−9.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,613 of 1,974tied with 51 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.4 average for 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

13.8% −2.4 pts vs 16.2%

  • 13.8% is 2.4 percentage points lower than the 16.2% average among 1,912 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Columbus JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,613th of 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 51 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged, Special Education

TEA track year 0

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
25.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageColumbus JH 8372667171 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7180.4 1,974 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7180.2 1,949 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6678.2 1,929 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7278.7 1,897 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8382.4 1,872 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,883 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−9.1 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps67 D−10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
  • Academic Growth69 D−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,820 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Columbus JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,974 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps67D3
Academic Growth69D1
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level64%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level59%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level63%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,974 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
317
Economically disadvantaged
62.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.1%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Columbus JH

African American: 10.4%Hispanic: 45.4%White: 41.3%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 2.2%
  • African American 10.4%
  • Hispanic 45.4%
  • White 41.3%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 2.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting for every category shown · 1,974 in full cohort

African American: 10.7%Hispanic: 49.7%White: 33.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.7%
  • Hispanic 49.7%
  • White 33.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
317
Economically disadvantaged students
197
Emergent bilingual students
51
Special education students
64

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
335
TEA-published mobility rate
7.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 323 students in 2024–25.

Latest available PEIMS enrollment
323

2024–25

Change since 2021–22
−22

Decrease · −6.4%

Enrollment in 2024–25

This school
323
Selected comparison
634.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Columbus JH
School yearStudents enrolledColumbus JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 345 First available year 635.6
2022–23 333 Decrease of 12 (3.5%) 640.3
2023–24 313 Decrease of 20 (6.0%) 637.2
2024–25 323 Increase of 10 (3.2%) 634.1
2025–26 Not reported Not available —

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
63

18.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
110

32.84 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
335

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
18.8%
Selected comparison
12.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,503 rated schools reporting

+6.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
32.84
Selected comparison
29.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 rated schools reporting

+3.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Columbus JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 355 65 18.3% 187 52.68 9.7% 19.2
2021–22 365 106 29.0% 371 101.64 12.6% 29.1
2022–23 341 62 18.2% 188 55.13 13.2% 31.3
2023–24 325 63 19.4% 145 44.62 13.1% 31.1
2024–25 335 63 18.8% 110 32.84 12.8% 29.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Columbus JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 63 18.8% 110 32.84 12.8% 29.5
In-school suspensions 62 18.5% 96 28.66 11.5% 22.7
Out-of-school suspensions 12 3.6% 13 3.88 6.9% 10.1
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Columbus JH
  • Parent district: Columbus ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,567
Selected comparison
$12,503

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting

−$936 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,567 per student for this campus, $15,102 per student for its parent district, Columbus ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearColumbus JHParent district: Columbus ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,293$11,665$13,054$7,919 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,801 rated schools reporting
2019$8,173$10,938$13,108$8,070 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,817 rated schools reporting
2020$10,191$12,382$14,058$8,675 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 rated schools reporting
2021$9,213$13,476$14,797$9,106 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 rated schools reporting
2022$10,044$14,380$15,708$10,455 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting
2023$10,977$15,157$16,792$11,132 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 rated schools reporting
2024$11,674$15,109$18,125$11,963 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2025$11,567$15,102$18,972$12,503 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,865−$1,500 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−16.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.3−6.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Columbus JH

Beginning: 3.1%1 to 5 years: 34.2%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 19.1%21 to 30 years: 19.1%Over 30 years: 5.4%
  • Beginning 3.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.1%
  • Over 30 years 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting for every category shown · 1,974 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.8%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.2%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Columbus JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classColumbus JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 615.217.7
Secondary English15.915
Secondary math15.115.8
Secondary science14.717.3
Secondary social studies16.217.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

19 measures

  • 5of 13

    Per-student spending

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Reading — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Math — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Science — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Science — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Attendance

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    All Subjects — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    School Progress

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Academic Growth

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    Relative Performance

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 11

    Math — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 10

    Science — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Student Achievement

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Closing the Gaps

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Math — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 045902041.