−1.6 ptsvs 79.6 average · 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,176 of 2,022tied with 84 others
Score vs region
−5.3 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
950 of 1,303tied with 52 others
Score vs county
−2.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 13 rated schools in Colorado County
Colorado County placement
9 of 13among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
−2.9 ptsvs 80.9 average · 3,844 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,397 of 3,844tied with 131 others
Score vs state
−3.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,963 of 7,646tied with 264 others
C78
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.6 average for 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is below the 80.2 average for 13 rated schools in Colorado County.The current score is below the 80.9 average for 3,844 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
50%vs 47.3% avg · +2.7 pts
Masters
24%vs 19.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 1,912 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Columbus Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.6 average for 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,176th of 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).
Columbus Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 950th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 52 others).
Columbus Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 13 rated schools in Colorado County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 13 rated schools in Colorado County.
Columbus Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.9 average for 3,844 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,397th of 3,844 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 131 others).
Columbus Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement77 C−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,912 reporting
School Progress81 B+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Academic Growth73 C−0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
Columbus Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,022 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
77
C
3
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
73
C
7
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so
Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level73%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Meets grade level50%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Masters grade level24%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Meets grade level52%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Meets grade level51%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level64%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Meets grade level42%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,022 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
782
Economically disadvantaged
66.9%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.5%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.1%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Columbus Elem
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 38.7%
Asian 0.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 reporting for every category shown · 2,022 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 53.7%
White 28.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Colorado County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 54%
White 33.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,844 reporting for every category shown · 3,844 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.6%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
762
Economically disadvantaged students
510
Emergent bilingual students
156
Special education students
161
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
57
Students in TEA mobility denominator
605
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 782 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 16 (2.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
782
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−16
Decrease · −2.0%
Change since 2021–22
+48
Increase · +6.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
782
Selected comparison
635.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,989 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Columbus Elem
School year
Students enrolledColumbus Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
734
First available year
647.1
2022–23
760
Increase of 26 (3.5%)
654.3
2023–24
786
Increase of 26 (3.4%)
654
2024–25
798
Increase of 12 (1.5%)
651
2025–26
782
Decrease of 16 (2.0%)
635.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
62
7.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
139
16.85 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
825
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.5%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,549 rated schools reporting
−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
16.85
Selected comparison
30.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
−13.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Columbus Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
729
43
5.9%
77
10.56
9.7%
19.3
2021–22
768
72
9.4%
143
18.62
12.8%
30.1
2022–23
783
73
9.3%
141
18.01
13.3%
32.1
2023–24
834
90
10.8%
178
21.34
13.2%
31.7
2024–25
825
62
7.5%
139
16.85
12.8%
30.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Columbus Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
62
7.5%
139
16.85
12.8%
30.2
In-school suspensions
61
7.4%
135
16.36
11.5%
23
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Columbus Elem
Parent district: Columbus ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,944
Selected comparison
$13,241
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
−$2,297 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,944 per student for this campus, $15,102 per student for its parent district, Columbus ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Columbus Elem
Parent district: Columbus ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,612
$11,665
$13,054
$7,983
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,149
$10,938
$13,108
$8,144
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,194
$12,382
$14,058
$8,716
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,280
$13,476
$14,797
$9,206
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,902
$14,380
$15,708
$10,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,922
$15,157
$16,792
$11,207
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,953 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,976
$15,109
$18,125
$12,335
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,944
$15,102
$18,972
$13,241
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,461−$2,020 vs similar economic context
Teachers
54+10.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2+0.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Columbus Elem
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 27.5%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 32.3%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 reporting for every category shown · 2,022 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Colorado County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
Beginning 4%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 26%
21 to 30 years 24.7%
Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,844 reporting for every category shown · 3,844 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Columbus Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classColumbus Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.9
18
Grade 1
18.8
18.2
Grade 2
18.7
18.4
Grade 3
16.9
18.7
Grade 4
19.8
19
Grade 5
22.4
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 11
Math — Masters
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
20 measures
4of 12
Reading — Meets
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 12
Reading — Masters
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 12
All Subjects — Masters
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 12
Reading — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 11
Math — Meets
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 13
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
6of 13
Per-student spending
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
6of 11
Math — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
6of 10
Science — Meets
Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure
6of 10
Science — Masters
Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure
7of 13
Attendance
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
7of 12
All Subjects — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
7of 12
All Subjects — Meets
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
7of 10
Science — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure
8of 11
School Progress
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
8of 11
Academic Growth
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
8of 11
Relative Performance
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
9of 13
Overall score
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
9of 12
Student Achievement
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
9of 11
Closing the Gaps
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 045902101.