Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
College Park ElemA90vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
College Park Elem
Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 432 students
Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.7 ptsvs 79.3 average · 2,031 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
260 of 2,031tied with 64 others
Score vs region
+6.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
337 of 1,303tied with 65 others
Score vs county
+6.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
239 of 911tied with 40 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,303 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
730 of 4,303tied with 172 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.3 average for 2,031 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,303 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 46.6% avg · +16.4 pts
Masters
38%vs 18.8% avg · +19.2 pts
Among 1,913 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
College Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.3 average for 2,031 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 260th of 2,031 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).
College Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 337th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 65 others).
College Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 239th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 40 others).
College Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,303 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 730th of 4,303 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 172 others).
College Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,913 reporting
School Progress91 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,906 reporting
Closing the Gaps87 B+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,893 reporting
Academic Growth90 A+16.6 vs similar economic context · 1,846 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,906 reporting
College Park Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,031 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
87
B
3
Academic Growth
90
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
Meets grade level63%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
Masters grade level38%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Meets grade level68%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Masters grade level46%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Meets grade level62%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Masters grade level36%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Meets grade level48%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Masters grade level20%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,031 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
432
Economically disadvantaged
68.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.9%−6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.0%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.7%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
College Park Elem
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 25%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 reporting for every category shown · 2,031 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 55.6%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,303 reporting for every category shown · 4,303 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
432
Economically disadvantaged students
297
Emergent bilingual students
60
Special education students
108
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
31
Students in TEA mobility denominator
288
TEA-published mobility rate
10.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 432 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
432
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
0
No change
Change since 2021–22
−6
Decrease · −1.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
432
Selected comparison
640.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for College Park Elem
School year
Students enrolledCollege Park Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
438
First available year
654
2022–23
437
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
660.9
2023–24
434
Decrease of 3 (0.7%)
659.4
2024–25
432
Decrease of 2 (0.5%)
657
2025–26
432
No change
640.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10
2.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
21
4.45 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
472
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.1%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,549 rated schools reporting
−10.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.45
Selected comparison
30.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,660 rated schools reporting
−26.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for College Park Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
487
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
489
12
2.5%
13
2.66
12.9%
30.4
2022–23
488
10
2.0%
18
3.69
13.4%
32.4
2023–24
481
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
472
10
2.1%
21
4.45
13.0%
30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for College Park Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
10
2.1%
21
4.45
13.0%
30.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
18
3.81
—
23.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
College Park Elem
Parent district: La Porte ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,028
Selected comparison
$13,156
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,009 rated schools reporting
−$128 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,028 per student for this campus, $26,590 per student for its parent district, La Porte ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
College Park Elem
Parent district: La Porte ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,566
$16,789
$13,054
$7,995
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,444
$15,044
$13,108
$8,163
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,014
$15,283
$14,058
$8,704
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,206
$16,586
$14,797
$9,199
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,283
$17,016
$15,708
$10,440
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,492
$19,446
$16,792
$11,103
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,831
$26,911
$18,125
$12,347
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,028
$26,590
$18,972
$13,156
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,009 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,637+$7,180 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−11.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.5−0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
College Park Elem
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 28.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 reporting for every category shown · 2,031 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.7%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,303 reporting for every category shown · 4,303 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for College Park Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCollege Park Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15
18
Grade 1
17.7
18.2
Grade 2
17.6
18.4
Grade 3
15.6
18.7
Grade 4
17.8
18.9
Grade 5
23.8
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
31of 1,911
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,911 that report this measure
47of 1,913
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,913 that report this measure · tied with 5
49of 1,903
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,903 that report this measure · tied with 12
50of 1,846
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,846 that report this measure · tied with 27
85of 1,911
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,911 that report this measure · tied with 12
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101916105.