Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Coleman 6th Grade Campus

Montgomery County · Region 06: Huntsville · 455 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
60/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−20.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,980 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,918 of 1,980tied with 6 others
D60

At a glance

The current score is below the 80.4 average for 1,980 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Coleman 6th Grade Campus is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 1,980 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,918th of 1,980 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 60 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6080.4 1,980 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement60 D−18.5 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
  • School Progress57 F−24.1 vs similar economic context · 1,882 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps61 D−16.6 vs similar economic context · 1,864 reporting
  • Academic Growth54 F−20.2 vs similar economic context · 1,826 reporting
  • Relative Performance57 F−22.4 vs similar economic context · 1,882 reporting
  • Coleman 6th Grade Campus
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,980 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement60D10
School Progress57F3
Closing the Gaps61D9
Academic Growth54F6
Relative Performance57F3

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (60), so School Progress (57) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 60.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level61%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,980 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
455
Economically disadvantaged
62.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.4%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.9%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Coleman 6th Grade Campus

African American: 5.7%Hispanic: 50.1%White: 40.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.8%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 5.7%
  • Hispanic 50.1%
  • White 40.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 reporting for every category shown · 1,980 in full cohort

African American: 10.8%Hispanic: 49.7%White: 33%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.8%
  • Hispanic 49.7%
  • White 33%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
455
Economically disadvantaged students
283
Emergent bilingual students
102
Special education students
104

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,606+$3,238 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−15.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8−2.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Coleman 6th Grade Campus

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 47.6%6 to 10 years: 18.1%11 to 20 years: 21.8%21 to 30 years: 3.7%Over 30 years: 1.5%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.7%
  • Over 30 years 1.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 reporting for every category shown · 1,980 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.9%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.2%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170907061.