Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Coahoma HS

Howard County · Region 18: Midland · 305 students

Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
+20 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−3.1 ptsvs 87.1 average · 1,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
745 of 1,068tied with 42 others
B84

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 87.1 average for 1,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 24 points

63 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 2.5 points above the 84.5 average among 1,036 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Coahoma HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 87.1 average for 1,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 20 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 745th of 1,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 42 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCoahoma HS 6471707284 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8487.1 1,068 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7286.9 1,048 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7085.6 1,030 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7186.0 1,015 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6487.3 1,000 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B−4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,046 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−9.1 vs similar economic context · 1,044 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,036 reporting
  • Academic Growth72 C−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,026 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,044 reporting
  • Coahoma HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,068 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth72C8
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (83), so School Progress (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,046 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,046 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,046 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,045 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,043 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,043 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,043 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 954 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 954 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 954 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,068 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
74.0%−15.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria74.0%89.5%−15.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course40.7%64.1%−23.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA9.9%42.2%−32.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%19.5%−19.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course42.0%38.9%+3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification4.9%35.8%−30.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate1.2%0.7%+0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.5%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.5%−6.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.5%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.4%6.9%+0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.2%3.1%−1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
305
Economically disadvantaged
31.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.9%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.6%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.1%+12.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Coahoma HS

African American: 1%Hispanic: 44.6%White: 53.1%American Indian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 1%
  • African American 1%
  • Hispanic 44.6%
  • White 53.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,068 reporting for every category shown · 1,068 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 30.3%White: 48%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 7.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 30.3%
  • White 48%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 7.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
305
Economically disadvantaged students
95
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
37

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
37
Students in TEA mobility denominator
337
TEA-published mobility rate
11%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 305 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (3.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
305

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−12

Decrease · −3.8%

Change since 2021–22
+45

Increase · +17.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
305
Selected comparison
788.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Coahoma HS
School yearStudents enrolledCoahoma HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 260 First available year 800.5
2022–23 271 Increase of 11 (4.2%) 803.3
2023–24 303 Increase of 32 (11.8%) 800.3
2024–25 317 Increase of 14 (4.6%) 796.9
2025–26 305 Decrease of 12 (3.8%) 788.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
33

9.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
61

18.10 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
337

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.8%
Selected comparison
9.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 803 rated schools reporting

+0.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
18.1
Selected comparison
18.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting

−0.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Coahoma HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 274 17 6.2% 32 11.68 7.3% 13.2
2021–22 286 20 7.0% 30 10.49 9.5% 19.3
2022–23 288 16 5.6% 23 7.99 9.7% 20.1
2023–24 321 57 17.8% 149 46.42 9.3% 19.9
2024–25 337 33 9.8% 61 18.10 9.0% 18.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Coahoma HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 33 9.8% 61 18.10 9.0% 18.5
In-school suspensions 20 5.9% 26 7.72 8.1% 14.4
Out-of-school suspensions 19 5.6% 22 6.53 4.4% 6
DAEP placements 13 3.9% 13 3.86 3.2% 3.8
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$16k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Coahoma HS
  • Parent district: Coahoma ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,629
Selected comparison
$11,751

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,047 rated schools reporting

−$3,122 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,629 per student for this campus, $23,714 per student for its parent district, Coahoma ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCoahoma HSParent district: Coahoma ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,731$15,462$13,054$7,642 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 rated schools reporting
2019$7,609$12,429$13,108$7,781 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 958 rated schools reporting
2020$7,696$15,080$14,058$8,117 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 968 rated schools reporting
2021$7,654$13,300$14,797$8,534 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 979 rated schools reporting
2022$8,433$15,004$15,708$9,754 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 999 rated schools reporting
2023$9,010$15,175$16,792$10,281 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,016 rated schools reporting
2024$8,280$22,355$18,125$11,444 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,029 rated schools reporting
2025$8,629$23,714$18,972$11,751 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,047 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,543−$647 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−30.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.4−0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Coahoma HS

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 30.7%6 to 10 years: 1.9%11 to 20 years: 36.8%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 9.4%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 1.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 36.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 9.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,068 reporting for every category shown · 1,068 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.9%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.2%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Coahoma HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCoahoma HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English17.416.6
Secondary languages other than English11.318.6
Secondary math9.817.4
Secondary science10.718.9
Secondary social studies10.119

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 11

    Overall score

    Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Per-student spending

    Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Attendance

    Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 11

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Howard County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 144

    Math — Approaches

    Region 18: Midland · of the 144 that report this measure

  • 9of 67

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Region 18: Midland · of the 67 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 67

    Social Studies — Meets

    Region 18: Midland · of the 67 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 114902001.