Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

City View Elem

Wichita County · Region 09: Wichita Falls · 537 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
−9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
879 of 2,055tied with 73 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 5 points

76 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 2.7 points above the 78.3 average among 1,915 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
48%vs 45% avg · +3 pts
Masters
19%vs 17.8% avg · +1.2 pts

Among 1,921 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
48%vs 39.9% avg · +8.1 pts
Masters
20%vs 15% avg · +5 pts

Among 1,910 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

City View Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 879th of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCity View Elem 9081778781 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8178.8 2,055 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8778.4 2,038 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7776.3 2,025 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8176.8 2,000 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9081.9 1,984 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,921 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,915 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,900 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,855 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,915 reporting
  • City View Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
537
Economically disadvantaged
72.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.0%−17.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.1%+4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.9%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

City View Elem

African American: 9.7%Hispanic: 35.8%White: 41.5%American Indian: 1.7%Asian: 0.2%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 10.8%
  • African American 9.7%
  • Hispanic 35.8%
  • White 41.5%
  • American Indian 1.7%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 10.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

African American: 12.6%Hispanic: 59.8%White: 22%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.6%
  • Hispanic 59.8%
  • White 22%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
537
Economically disadvantaged students
391
Emergent bilingual students
27
Special education students
124

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
70
Students in TEA mobility denominator
432
TEA-published mobility rate
16.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
66

11.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
134

23.26 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
576

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.5%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting

−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
23.26
Selected comparison
31.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 rated schools reporting

−8.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for City View Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 541 85 15.7% 202 37.34 9.3% 18.6
2021–22 564 87 15.4% 171 30.32 13.0% 30.9
2022–23 552 79 14.3% 153 27.72 13.6% 33.2
2023–24 582 59 10.1% 148 25.43 13.4% 32.8
2024–25 576 66 11.5% 134 23.26 13.2% 31.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for City View Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 66 11.5% 134 23.26 13.2% 31.6
In-school suspensions 65 11.3% 126 21.88 11.8% 23.8
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$23k20182020202220242025
  • City View Elem
  • Parent district: City View ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,439
Selected comparison
$13,083

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

−$1,644 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,439 per student for this campus, $21,777 per student for its parent district, City View ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCity View ElemParent district: City View ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,335$13,577$13,054$8,053 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 rated schools reporting
2019$6,273$13,553$13,108$8,203 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,927 rated schools reporting
2020$7,602$19,003$14,058$8,753 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 rated schools reporting
2021$8,424$21,999$14,797$9,299 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
2022$12,751$20,643$15,708$10,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2023$10,181$18,877$16,792$11,228 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
2024$10,161$19,002$18,125$12,312 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting
2025$11,439$21,777$18,972$13,083 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,940−$2,621 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−6.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7+0.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

City View Elem

1 to 5 years: 8.2%6 to 10 years: 12.3%11 to 20 years: 43.8%21 to 30 years: 35.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 8.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 12.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 43.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 35.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.4%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for City View Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCity View Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten16.817.9
Grade 120.618.2
Grade 21818.3
Grade 31918.6
Grade 419.518.9
Grade 520.719.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 6of 34

    Per-student spending

    Wichita County · of the 34 that report this measure

  • 6of 32

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Wichita County · of the 32 that report this measure

  • 7of 32

    Attendance

    Wichita County · of the 32 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 30

    Closing the Gaps

    Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 10of 30

    Math — Masters

    Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 243906101.