Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
94 +13.7 pts vs 80.3
- 94 is 13.7 points above the 80.3 average among 1,992 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Cisco Learning Center
Eastland County · Region 14: Abilene · 16 students
- Current score
- 94/1002025-26
- Change
- +6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +13.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 85 of 1,992tied with 36 others
- Score vs region
- +13.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene
- Region 14: Abilene placement
- 10 of 122tied with 3 others
- Score vs county
- +16.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 15 rated schools in Eastland County
- Eastland County placement
- 2 of 15among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +10.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 22 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3 of 22tied with 1 other
- Score vs state
- +12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.3 average for 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene.The current score is above the 77.5 average for 15 rated schools in Eastland County.The current score is above the 83.5 average for 22 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
94 +15.6 pts vs 78.4
- 94 is 15.6 points above the 78.4 average among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
6.9% −9.4 pts vs 16.3%
- 6.9% is 9.4 percentage points lower than the 16.3% average among 1,929 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 14: Abilene average
98.3% +3.9 pts vs 94.4%
- 98.3% is 3.9 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 117 schools in Region 14: Abilene reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 117 schools in Region 14: Abilene reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Region 14: Abilene average
94 +13.5 pts vs 80.5
- 94 is 13.5 points above the 80.5 average among 122 schools in Region 14: Abilene reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the Region 14: Abilene average
94 +14.3 pts vs 79.7
- 94 is 14.3 points above the 79.7 average among 114 schools in Region 14: Abilene reporting this measure.
Top placement
Student Achievement
94 Tied for 1st of 15 schools in Eastland County reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Chronically absent
6.9% 1st-lowest of 15 schools in Eastland County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Attendance
98.3% 1st of 15 schools in Eastland County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Social Studies — Masters
33% Tied for 1st of 13 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
21.4% 1st of 14 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
14.3% 1st of 14 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Texas average
94 +12.7 pts vs 81.3
- 94 is 12.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the Texas average
94 +15.4 pts vs 78.6
- 94 is 15.4 points above the 78.6 average among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
6.9% −9.8 pts vs 16.7%
- 6.9% is 9.8 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 85th of 1,992 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene (tied with 3 others).
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 15 rated schools in Eastland County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 15 rated schools in Eastland County.
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 22 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 22 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 1 other).
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 379th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 208 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 94 | 80.3 1,992 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 96 | 80.1 1,967 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 97 | 78.1 1,947 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 93 | 78.6 1,914 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 82.3 1,889 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Cisco Learning Center
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,992 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 94 | A | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,992 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+28.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+23.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+21.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 71.0%−17.1 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 71.0% | 88.1% | −17.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 517 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 64.3% | 59.8% | +4.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 28.1% | −28.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 10.8% | −10.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 14.3% | 33.9% | −19.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 7.1% | 38.3% | −31.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.7% | −1.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 6.8% | −6.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.6% | −3.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 3.2% | −3.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 21.4% | 7.9% | +13.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 14.3% | 3.4% | +10.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 521 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 16
- Economically disadvantaged
- 62.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−16.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 18.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 98.3%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 6.9%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Cisco Learning Center
- White 100%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 reporting for every category shown · 1,992 in full cohort
- African American 10.7%
- Hispanic 50%
- White 32.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 36.9%
- White 54.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Eastland County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
- African American 0.8%
- Hispanic 25.4%
- White 71.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 22 reporting for every category shown · 22 in full cohort
- African American 7.9%
- Hispanic 55.7%
- White 32.4%
- Asian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 16
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 10
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 3
TEA context labels
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 26
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 30
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 86.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 16 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (33.3%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 16
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +4
Increase · +33.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 16
- Selected comparison
- 618.3
| School year | Students enrolledCisco Learning Center | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2022–23 | 19 | No adjacent prior year | 636.6 |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2024–25 | 12 | No adjacent prior year | 630.7 |
| 2025–26 | 16 | Increase of 4 (33.3%) | 618.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 30
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 25 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 19 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 30 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 25 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 30 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Cisco Learning Center
- Parent district: Cisco ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $21,944
- Selected comparison
- $12,536
For 2025, TEA reported $21,944 per student for this campus, $15,430 per student for its parent district, Cisco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Cisco Learning Center | Parent district: Cisco ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $44,343 | $10,983 | $13,054 | $7,921 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,816 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $15,373 | $11,547 | $13,108 | $8,069 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $38,816 | $13,409 | $14,058 | $8,668 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,854 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $19,803 | $13,500 | $14,797 | $9,108 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $28,225 | $17,303 | $15,708 | $10,442 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $12,467 | $15,883 | $16,792 | $11,124 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $28,053 | $15,370 | $18,125 | $11,982 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $21,944 | $15,430 | $18,972 | $12,536 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $75,490+$9,120 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 4−38.2 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 4−9.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Cisco Learning Center
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 65%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 reporting for every category shown · 1,992 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 19.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.2%
- 21 to 30 years 16%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 25.9%
- 6 to 10 years 16.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison average For Eastland County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
- Beginning 10.3%
- 1 to 5 years 24.7%
- 6 to 10 years 13.7%
- 11 to 20 years 23.9%
- 21 to 30 years 20.2%
- Over 30 years 7.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 22 reporting for every category shown · 22 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.1%
- 1 to 5 years 16.7%
- 6 to 10 years 10.6%
- 11 to 20 years 18.2%
- 21 to 30 years 19.5%
- Over 30 years 10.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classCisco Learning Center · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 3.5 | 15 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 3 | 17.4 |
| Secondary math | 2.3 | 15.8 |
| Secondary science | 3.4 | 17.3 |
| Secondary social studies | 4.6 | 17.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 130 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
7 measures
-
1of 15
Student Achievement
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 15
Attendance
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
1of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
1of 15
Per-student spending
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
1of 14
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure
-
1of 14
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure
-
1of 13
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
-
2of 15
Overall score
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
2of 15
All Subjects — Approaches
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
2of 14
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure
-
3of 14
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Social Studies — Meets
Similar size · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 10
Social Studies — Approaches
Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
-
4of 14
College, career or military ready
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 20
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure
-
7of 20
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure
-
7of 18
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
-
7of 14
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 18
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 067902004.