Campus · Traditional · Alternative Education Accountability
Cisco Learning Center
Eastland County · Region 14: Abilene · 16 students
Cisco Learning Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average of the 1,992 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.3. It is up 6 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 99.
Ranks 379th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 208 others), and 10th of 122 in Region 14: Abilene (tied with 3 others).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 94 | 80.3 | 81.3 |
| 2024-25 | A | 96 | 80.1 | 81.2 |
| 2023-24 | A | 97 | 78.1 | 78.9 |
| 2022-23 | A | 93 | 78.6 | 79.1 |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 82.3 | 83.7 |
How this school's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Cisco Learning Center itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.
Texas schools
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Cisco Learning Center
- Similar student population (1,992)
- Region 14: Abilene (122)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 94 | A | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (1,992)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,992 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+28.4 pts vs similar
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+23.9 pts vs similar
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+21.6 pts vs similar
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−4.4 pts vs similar
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This school | similar | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 71.0% | 88.1% | −17.1 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 64.3% | 59.8% | +4.5 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 28.1% | −28.1 |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 10.8% | −10.8 |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 14.3% | 33.9% | −19.6 |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 7.1% | 38.3% | −31.2 |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.7% | −1.7 |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 6.8% | −6.8 |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.6% | −3.6 |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 3.2% | −3.2 |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 21.4% | 7.9% | +13.5 |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 14.3% | 3.4% | +10.9 |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 16
- Economically disadvantaged
- 62.5%−0.3 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 0.0%−16.9 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 18.8%−0.1 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 98.3%+4.1 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 6.9%−9.4 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- White 100%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Cisco Learning Center
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.
Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $75,490+$9,120 vs similar
- Teachers
- 4
- Students per staff member
- 4
Teaching experience
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 65%
- Over 30 years 5%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 128 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
1of 121
Average teacher salary
Region 14: Abilene · of the 121 that report this measure
-
1of 15
Student Achievement
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 15
Attendance
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
1of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
1of 15
Average teacher salary
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
2of 117
Attendance
Region 14: Abilene · of the 117 that report this measure
-
2of 15
Overall score
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
2of 15
All Subjects — Approaches
Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Social Studies — Approaches
Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 10
Social Studies — Meets
Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
3of 10
Social Studies — Masters
Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
4of 47
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site
publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 067902004.