2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Progress
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 2 · Title I campus
Traditional public school campus
Cheatham Elem
Red River County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 236 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 56/1002025-26
- Change
- −13 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −21.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 2,001 of 2,068tied with 4 others
- Score vs region
- −25.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 139 of 142among reporting schools
- Score vs county
- −22.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 8 rated schools in Red River County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −24.8 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,736 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,693 of 1,736tied with 4 others
- Score vs state
- −25.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,514 of 7,646tied with 20 others
F56
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 66 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is below the 78.5 average for 8 rated schools in Red River County.The current score is below the 80.8 average for 1,736 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Cheatham Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,001st of 2,068 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
Cheatham Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 139th of 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.
Cheatham Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.5 average for 8 rated schools in Red River County. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Cheatham Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.8 average for 1,736 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,693rd of 1,736 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 4 others).
Cheatham Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7,514th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 20 others).
4 consecutive years rated unacceptable. At three or more years, Texas law provides for state intervention.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026-27 school year
Public Education Grant transfer eligibility
Students assigned to this campus may request a transfer under the state's PEG program.
A request is not guaranteed. A receiving district may apply its enrollment rules, and transportation is not automatically provided.
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 33.7%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 9.0%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 66 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | F | 56 | 77.6 2,068 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | F | 56 | 77.3 2,050 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | F | 59 | 73.8 2,032 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | F | 51 | 73.3 2,026 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 69 | 81.9 2,001 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Cheatham Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,068 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 48 | F | 12 |
| School Progress | 54 | F | 6 |
| Closing the Gaps | 61 | D | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 54 | F | 6 |
| Relative Performance | 50 | F | 10 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (54), so Student Achievement (48) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 54.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,068 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 236
- Economically disadvantaged
- 92.8%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 11.9%−29.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 25.8%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 24.6%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Cheatham Elem
- African American 44.1%
- Hispanic 24.2%
- White 21.6%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 9.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 reporting for every category shown · 2,068 in full cohort
- African American 14.9%
- Hispanic 76.4%
- White 5.5%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- African American 16.3%
- Hispanic 21.3%
- White 54.6%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Red River County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
- African American 15%
- Hispanic 16.7%
- White 59.6%
- American Indian 1%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,736 reporting for every category shown · 1,736 in full cohort
- African American 9.4%
- Hispanic 49.7%
- White 36%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 236
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 219
- Emergent bilingual students
- 28
- Special education students
- 61
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 44
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 208
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 21.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 236 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (8.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 236
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −22
Decrease · −8.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- −37
Decrease · −13.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 236
- Selected comparison
- 569.7
| School year | Students enrolledCheatham Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 273 | First available year | 615 |
| 2022–23 | 272 | Decrease of 1 (0.4%) | 611.2 |
| 2023–24 | 263 | Decrease of 9 (3.3%) | 601.5 |
| 2024–25 | 258 | Decrease of 5 (1.9%) | 594.9 |
| 2025–26 | 236 | Decrease of 22 (8.5%) | 569.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 45
15.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 79
27.05 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 292
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 15.4%
- Selected comparison
- 13.0%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 27.05
- Selected comparison
- 30.8
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 272 | 17 | 6.3% | 20 | 7.35 | 6.9% | 13.2 |
| 2021–22 | 311 | 54 | 17.4% | 85 | 27.33 | 12.5% | 29.6 |
| 2022–23 | 307 | 50 | 16.3% | 87 | 28.34 | 13.4% | 32.4 |
| 2023–24 | 304 | 41 | 13.5% | 70 | 23.03 | 13.7% | 32.9 |
| 2024–25 | 292 | 45 | 15.4% | 79 | 27.05 | 13.0% | 30.8 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 45 | 15.4% | 79 | 27.05 | 13.0% | 30.8 |
| In-school suspensions | 45 | 15.4% | 76 | 26.03 | 11.3% | 21.7 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Cheatham Elem
- Parent district: Clarksville ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,415
- Selected comparison
- $13,246
For 2025, TEA reported $10,415 per student for this campus, $22,700 per student for its parent district, Clarksville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Cheatham Elem | Parent district: Clarksville ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,122 | $13,041 | $13,054 | $8,315 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,522 | $13,385 | $13,108 | $8,338 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,559 | $14,859 | $14,058 | $8,839 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $9,487 | $15,430 | $14,797 | $9,654 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $9,321 | $20,343 | $15,708 | $11,232 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $9,256 | $37,765 | $16,792 | $11,750 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $10,315 | $35,317 | $18,125 | $12,675 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,035 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,415 | $22,700 | $18,972 | $13,246 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $60,171−$8,143 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 20−19.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.6−3.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Cheatham Elem
- Beginning 21.7%
- 1 to 5 years 21.7%
- 6 to 10 years 20.7%
- 11 to 20 years 13.8%
- 21 to 30 years 19.7%
- Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 reporting for every category shown · 2,068 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Red River County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.8%
- 6 to 10 years 15.1%
- 11 to 20 years 24.4%
- 21 to 30 years 19.8%
- Over 30 years 8.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,736 reporting for every category shown · 1,736 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.5%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 17.8%
- 11 to 20 years 28.5%
- 21 to 30 years 17.5%
- Over 30 years 5%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classCheatham Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 15 | 18.1 |
| Grade 1 | 18 | 18.3 |
| Grade 2 | 18.5 | 18.3 |
| Grade 3 | 22.8 | 18.5 |
| Grade 4 | 22.2 | 18.4 |
| Grade 5 | 14.2 | 19.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 194904103.