Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Central JHA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Central JH
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 1,054 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
83 of 1,969tied with 35 others
Score vs region
+13.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
35 of 839tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+14.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
24 of 466tied with 9 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 2,336 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
94 of 2,336tied with 81 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.4 average for 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 82.1 average for 2,336 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 49% avg · +31 pts
Masters
50%vs 20.1% avg · +29.9 pts
Among 1,879 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Central JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 83rd of 1,969 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 35 others).
Central JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 18 others).
Central JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 9 others).
Central JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 2,336 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 94th of 2,336 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 81 others).
Central JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+15.4 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
School Progress94 A+12.8 vs similar economic context · 1,872 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+17.3 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,816 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,872 reporting
Central JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,969 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Meets grade level80%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Masters grade level50%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Meets grade level83%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Masters grade level51%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Meets grade level78%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Masters grade level44%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Meets grade level84%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Masters grade level59%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 reporting
Meets grade level66%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 reporting
Masters grade level44%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,969 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,054
Economically disadvantaged
61.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.4%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.3%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.3%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Central JH
African American 23.6%
Hispanic 27.7%
White 25.5%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 10.4%
Pacific Islander 5.5%
Two or More Races 6.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 reporting for every category shown · 1,969 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,336 reporting for every category shown · 2,336 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.5%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,053
Economically disadvantaged students
651
Emergent bilingual students
152
Special education students
108
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
107
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,128
TEA-published mobility rate
9.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,054 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (0.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,054
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−7
Decrease · −0.7%
Change since 2021–22
−61
Decrease · −5.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,054
Selected comparison
627.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Central JH
School year
Students enrolledCentral JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,115
First available year
640
2022–23
1,094
Decrease of 21 (1.9%)
644.3
2023–24
1,096
Increase of 2 (0.2%)
641.5
2024–25
1,061
Decrease of 35 (3.2%)
638.1
2025–26
1,054
Decrease of 7 (0.7%)
627.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
166
14.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
413
36.88 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,120
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
14.8%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,500 rated schools reporting
+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
36.88
Selected comparison
29.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 rated schools reporting
+7.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Central JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,235
139
11.3%
341
27.61
9.7%
19.2
2021–22
1,177
209
17.8%
680
57.77
12.7%
29.2
2022–23
1,171
239
20.4%
676
57.73
13.2%
31.2
2023–24
1,150
204
17.7%
510
44.35
13.1%
31.1
2024–25
1,120
166
14.8%
413
36.88
12.8%
29.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Central JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
166
14.8%
413
36.88
12.8%
29.4
In-school suspensions
164
14.6%
330
29.46
11.5%
22.7
Out-of-school suspensions
35
3.1%
49
4.38
6.9%
10
DAEP placements
29
2.6%
34
3.04
4.9%
5.9
Mandatory DAEP placements
17
1.5%
18
1.61
3.5%
4.1
Discretionary DAEP placements
16
1.4%
16
1.43
2.8%
3.2
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Central JH
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,687
Selected comparison
$12,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
−$3,815 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,687 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Central JH
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,728
$10,047
$13,054
$7,923
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,797 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,339
$11,598
$13,108
$8,070
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,813 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,425
$15,516
$14,058
$8,678
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,951
$12,690
$14,797
$9,106
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,260
$12,184
$15,708
$10,467
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,024
$14,299
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,266
$15,258
$18,125
$11,961
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,687
$17,072
$18,972
$12,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,298+$6,951 vs similar economic context
Teachers
78+35.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.6−5.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Central JH
Beginning 3.1%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 23.9%
11 to 20 years 28.1%
21 to 30 years 17.9%
Over 30 years 3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 reporting for every category shown · 1,969 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,336 reporting for every category shown · 2,336 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Central JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCentral JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
15.3
15
Secondary languages other than English
20.6
17.4
Secondary math
17.6
15.8
Secondary science
18.9
17.2
Secondary social studies
20.7
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
18 measures
11of 399
Science — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 2
11of 399
Science — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure
13of 1,879
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,879 that report this measure · tied with 1
16of 455
Relative Performance
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 2
16of 453
Closing the Gaps
Tarrant County · of the 453 that report this measure · tied with 2
17of 1,816
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,816 that report this measure · tied with 16
18of 1,876
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,876 that report this measure · tied with 1
18of 1,868
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,868 that report this measure · tied with 3
18of 456
School Progress
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 5
21of 399
Science — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 2
22of 455
Math — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 7
23of 1,868
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,868 that report this measure
24of 466
Overall score
Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 9
24of 457
All Subjects — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 5
39of 1,876
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,876 that report this measure · tied with 1
49of 1,879
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,879 that report this measure · tied with 13
60of 1,876
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,876 that report this measure · tied with 10
69of 1,879
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,879 that report this measure · tied with 20
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916041.