Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Central Heights ElemB89vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Central Heights Elem
Nacogdoches County · Region 07: Kilgore · 491 students
Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.0 ptsvs 83 average · 1,528 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
395 of 1,528tied with 55 others
Score vs region
+9.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
70 of 352tied with 15 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County
Nacogdoches County placement
7 of 24tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+8.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,670 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
990 of 4,670tied with 160 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83 average for 1,528 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
67%vs 55.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Masters
32%vs 24.8% avg · +7.2 pts
Among 1,485 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Central Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83 average for 1,528 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 395th of 1,528 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 55 others).
Central Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 70th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 15 others).
Central Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County (tied with 1 other).
Central Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 990th of 4,670 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 160 others).
Central Heights Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,485 reporting
School Progress86 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,481 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,473 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,457 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,481 reporting
Central Heights Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,528 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
Meets grade level67%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
Masters grade level32%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,483 reporting
Meets grade level71%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,483 reporting
Masters grade level35%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,483 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 reporting
Meets grade level61%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 reporting
Masters grade level26%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Meets grade level72%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Masters grade level39%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,528 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
491
Economically disadvantaged
45.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.8%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.5%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.0%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Central Heights Elem
African American 2.9%
Hispanic 25.3%
White 66.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 2%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,528 reporting for every category shown · 1,528 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 38.1%
White 44.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 30.6%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
491
Economically disadvantaged students
221
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
76
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
384
TEA-published mobility rate
4.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 491 students in 2025–26, an increase of 14 (2.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
491
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+14
Increase · +2.9%
Change since 2021–22
−25
Decrease · −4.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
491
Selected comparison
676.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,490 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Central Heights Elem
School year
Students enrolledCentral Heights Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
516
First available year
673.7
2022–23
488
Decrease of 28 (5.4%)
679.6
2023–24
482
Decrease of 6 (1.2%)
680.1
2024–25
477
Decrease of 5 (1.0%)
676.3
2025–26
491
Increase of 14 (2.9%)
676.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
2.22 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
495
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.22
Selected comparison
24.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 rated schools reporting
−22.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Central Heights Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
558
11
2.0%
21
3.76
9.4%
17.8
2021–22
536
14
2.6%
21
3.92
11.4%
24.4
2022–23
499
16
3.2%
29
5.81
11.8%
25.8
2023–24
500
17
3.4%
20
4.00
11.7%
26.4
2024–25
495
Suppressed
—
11
2.22
—
24.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Central Heights Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
2.22
—
24.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
2.02
—
19.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Central Heights Elem
Parent district: Central Heights ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,927
Selected comparison
$12,014
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 rated schools reporting
−$2,087 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,927 per student for this campus, $18,502 per student for its parent district, Central Heights ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Central Heights Elem
Parent district: Central Heights ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,719
$8,537
$13,054
$7,769
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,377 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,645
$8,456
$13,108
$7,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,260
$9,328
$14,058
$8,423
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,226
$12,289
$14,797
$8,841
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,426 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,631
$13,809
$15,708
$10,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,168
$14,713
$16,792
$10,582
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,456 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,303
$17,012
$18,125
$11,626
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,472 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,927
$18,502
$18,972
$12,014
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,963−$5,203 vs similar economic context
Teachers
43−1.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.4−9.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Central Heights Elem
1 to 5 years 20.9%
6 to 10 years 9.3%
11 to 20 years 44.2%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 9.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,528 reporting for every category shown · 1,528 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.2%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 25.2%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 26.1%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Central Heights Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCentral Heights Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15.6
18
Grade 1
13.4
18.4
Grade 2
16.4
18.6
Grade 3
15.9
19.2
Grade 4
14.6
19.2
Grade 5
14.3
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
2of 23
All Subjects — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
2of 23
Reading — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
2of 23
Math — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
2of 23
Math — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
3of 23
Reading — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
3of 23
Science — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
3of 23
Science — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 23
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
12 measures
4of 23
All Subjects — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
4of 23
Reading — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
4of 22
Academic Growth
Nacogdoches County · of the 22 that report this measure
5of 23
Student Achievement
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 23
All Subjects — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 23
Attendance
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 24
Overall score
Nacogdoches County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 23
Science — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 23
Math — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 23
School Progress
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 23
Closing the Gaps
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 23
Relative Performance
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 174908101.