Campus · Traditional
Cecil Everett Elem
Lamar County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 318 students
Cecil Everett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average of the 1,872 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.3. It is up 7 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 76.
Ranks 3,325th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 275 others), and 57th of 142 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 11 others).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 84 | 81.1 | 81.3 |
| 2024-25 | B | 80 | 81.2 | 81.2 |
| 2023-24 | B | 81 | 79.2 | 78.9 |
| 2022-23 | C | 79 | 79.8 | 79.1 |
| 2021-22 | C | 77 | 82.7 | 83.7 |
How this school's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Cecil Everett Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.
Texas schools
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Cecil Everett Elem
- Similar student population (1,872)
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant (142)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 318
- Economically disadvantaged
- 56.0%−0.5 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 6.9%−7.6 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 23.9%+5.1 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 95.6%+1.2 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 4.3%−11.0 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 3.8%
- Hispanic 17.3%
- White 70.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Cecil Everett Elem
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.
Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $61,698−$4,841 vs similar
- Teachers
- 20
- Students per staff member
- 16.3
Teaching experience
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 31.6%
- 6 to 10 years 13.8%
- 11 to 20 years 20.4%
- 21 to 30 years 20.4%
- Over 30 years 9.2%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
1of 18
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Lamar County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
5of 134
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 134 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 18
Attendance
Lamar County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
43of 1,814
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar student population · of the 1,814 that report this measure · tied with 9
-
367of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · ranking (bottom 1,500 shown)
-
4of 20
Per-student spending
Lamar County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
6of 20
Overall score
Lamar County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site
publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 139911101.