Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cayuga MS

Anderson County · Region 07: Kilgore · 119 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
435 of 1,930tied with 77 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
58%vs 50.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Masters
27%vs 20.8% avg · +6.2 pts

Among 1,852 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
59%vs 44% avg · +15 pts
Masters
22%vs 17.2% avg · +4.8 pts

Among 1,841 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 55% avg · +7 pts
Masters
35%vs 22.4% avg · +12.6 pts

Among 1,849 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cayuga MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 435th of 1,930 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCayuga MS 8385869188 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8880.9 1,930 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9180.8 1,903 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8678.8 1,882 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8579.4 1,850 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8382.7 1,825 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,852 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,845 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps83 B+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,828 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+6.5 vs similar economic context · 1,792 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,845 reporting
  • Cayuga MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps83B7
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance90A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,930 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
119
Economically disadvantaged
58.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−15.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.0%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cayuga MS

African American: 4.2%Hispanic: 7.6%White: 83.2%Asian: 1.7%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 4.2%
  • Hispanic 7.6%
  • White 83.2%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 47.1%White: 35.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 47.1%
  • White 35.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
119
Economically disadvantaged students
70
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
22

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
15
Students in TEA mobility denominator
134
TEA-published mobility rate
11.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 119 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (4.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
119

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−5

Decrease · −4.0%

Change since 2021–22
−40

Decrease · −25.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
119
Selected comparison
631

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cayuga MS
School yearStudents enrolledCayuga MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 159 First available year 636.5
2022–23 166 Increase of 7 (4.4%) 641
2023–24 138 Decrease of 28 (16.9%) 640.2
2024–25 124 Decrease of 14 (10.1%) 637.8
2025–26 119 Decrease of 5 (4.0%) 631

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

11.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
23

17.16 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
134

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.2%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 rated schools reporting

−1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.16
Selected comparison
28.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,586 rated schools reporting

−10.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cayuga MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 146 11 7.5% 16 10.96 9.7% 18.8
2021–22 173 14 8.1% 20 11.56 12.4% 28
2022–23 176 13 7.4% 25 14.20 12.9% 29.9
2023–24 151 22 14.6% 39 25.83 12.8% 29.7
2024–25 134 15 11.2% 23 17.16 12.5% 28.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cayuga MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 11.2% 23 17.16 12.5% 28.1
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 10 7.46 — 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$21k$35k20182020202220242025
  • Cayuga MS
  • Parent district: Cayuga ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,491
Selected comparison
$12,435

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting

−$1,944 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,491 per student for this campus, $33,350 per student for its parent district, Cayuga ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCayuga MSParent district: Cayuga ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,989$14,725$13,054$7,920 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,757 rated schools reporting
2019$8,462$15,931$13,108$8,095 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2020$8,932$16,938$14,058$8,694 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2021$8,476$17,238$14,797$9,064 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 rated schools reporting
2022$7,052$17,453$15,708$10,439 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,826 rated schools reporting
2023$7,394$20,134$16,792$10,997 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2024$8,642$20,871$18,125$11,794 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2025$10,491$33,350$18,972$12,435 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,687−$4,792 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−28.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.1−10.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cayuga MS

Beginning: 16%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 9.9%11 to 20 years: 21.4%21 to 30 years: 10.7%Over 30 years: 15.3%
  • Beginning 16%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 9.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.7%
  • Over 30 years 15.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting for every category shown · 1,930 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.3%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.4%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cayuga MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCayuga MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 614.517.5
Secondary English13.614.8
Secondary math14.715.7
Secondary science15.217.2
Secondary social studies15.317.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 20

    Math — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

18 measures

  • 4of 20

    School Progress

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 20

    Relative Performance

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 19

    Academic Growth

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 24

    Overall score

    Anderson County · of the 24 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 20

    Math — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 19

    Science — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 19

    Science — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Social Studies — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 20

    Student Achievement

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Anderson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Social Studies — Meets

    Anderson County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 10of 23

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Anderson County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 10of 19

    Science — Masters

    Anderson County · of the 19 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 001902041.