Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
CAST STEM HSA94vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
CAST STEM HS
Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 233 students
Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
83 of 1,999tied with 36 others
Score vs region
+15.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
17 of 650tied with 7 others
Score vs county
+16.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 401 rated schools in Bexar County
Bexar County placement
11 of 401tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,699 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
110 of 1,699tied with 47 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.1 average for 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 1,699 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
60%vs 48.4% avg · +11.6 pts
Masters
22%vs 19.8% avg · +2.2 pts
Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
CAST STEM HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 83rd of 1,999 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).
CAST STEM HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 7 others).
CAST STEM HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 11th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 2 others).
CAST STEM HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 1,699 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 110th of 1,699 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 47 others).
CAST STEM HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+15.9 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
School Progress96 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+12.7 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,834 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
CAST STEM HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,999 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so
Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Meets grade level60%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level74%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level14%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Meets grade level17%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Masters grade level5%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Meets grade level63%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Masters grade level35%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Meets grade level82%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Masters grade level38%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 945 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,999 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+6.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 463 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 464 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.1%+0.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 470 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
87.7%
+12.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
93.6%
59.4%
+34.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
63.8%
27.8%
+36.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
8.5%
10.7%
−2.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
33.8%
+66.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
38.4%
−38.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
29.8%
1.7%
+28.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
44.7%
6.7%
+38.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
2.1%
3.6%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.0%
−8.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.1%
3.4%
−1.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 506 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
45
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
32
71.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
13
28.9% of graduates
Not trackable
0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
45
Selected comparison
231.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
32
Selected comparison
103.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
71.1%
Selected comparison
44.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
+26.9 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
28.9%
Selected comparison
50.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
−21.9 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
ALAMO CCD PALO ALTO COLLEGE (023413)20
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
233
Economically disadvantaged
63.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.4%−11.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.6%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.6%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.7%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
CAST STEM HS
African American 6.4%
Hispanic 83.7%
White 5.2%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 reporting for every category shown · 1,999 in full cohort
African American 10.9%
Hispanic 50.8%
White 31.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,699 reporting for every category shown · 1,699 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 49.7%
White 36.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
233
Economically disadvantaged students
148
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
34
Early college pathways
Early College High School
153
TEA-published share: 65.7%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
185
TEA-published mobility rate
11.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 173 students in 2024–25.
Latest available PEIMS enrollment
173
2024–25
Enrollment in 2024–25
This school
173
Selected comparison
633.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for CAST STEM HS
School year
Students enrolledCAST STEM HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
235
First available year
635.3
2022–23
Not reported
Not available
—
2023–24
Not reported
Not available
—
2024–25
173
No adjacent prior year
633.5
2025–26
Not reported
Not available
—
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11
6.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
17
9.55 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
178
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.2%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 rated schools reporting
−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
9.55
Selected comparison
29.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
−20.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for CAST STEM HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
234
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
236
15
6.4%
25
10.59
12.7%
29.5
2022–23
211
10
4.7%
18
8.53
13.3%
31.8
2023–24
194
Suppressed
—
12
6.19
—
31.4
2024–25
178
11
6.2%
17
9.55
12.9%
29.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for CAST STEM HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
11
6.2%
17
9.55
12.9%
29.9
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
CAST STEM HS
Parent district: Southwest ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$17,062
Selected comparison
$12,670
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 rated schools reporting
+$4,392 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $17,062 per student for this campus, $21,252 per student for its parent district, Southwest ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
CAST STEM HS
Parent district: Southwest ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$13,450
$12,531
$13,108
$8,072
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,842 rated schools reporting
2020
$13,898
$13,796
$14,058
$8,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting
2021
$12,393
$16,286
$14,797
$9,096
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2022
$14,799
$16,958
$15,708
$10,419
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2023
$18,066
$15,695
$16,792
$11,133
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 rated schools reporting
2024
$15,974
$17,660
$18,125
$12,072
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 rated schools reporting
2025
$17,062
$21,252
$18,972
$12,670
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,667+$3,249 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−27.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5+1.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
CAST STEM HS
1 to 5 years 39.3%
6 to 10 years 20.7%
11 to 20 years 20%
21 to 30 years 20.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 reporting for every category shown · 1,999 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.1%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,699 reporting for every category shown · 1,699 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 17.8%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 17.5%
Over 30 years 5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for CAST STEM HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCAST STEM HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
9
15
Secondary languages other than English
12.9
17.4
Secondary math
11.6
15.8
Secondary science
15.6
17.3
Secondary social studies
12.2
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 65
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 65
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
4of 65
Earned an associate degree
Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure
6of 386
School Progress
Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 3
6of 386
Relative Performance
Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 3
9of 386
Student Achievement
Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 4
9of 65
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
11of 401
Overall score
Bexar County · of the 401 that report this measure · tied with 2
13of 380
Science — Approaches
Bexar County · of the 380 that report this measure · tied with 6
52of 945
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 945 that report this measure · tied with 4
87of 1,898
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,898 that report this measure · tied with 18
95of 1,894
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,894 that report this measure · tied with 12
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015912006.