Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Carlos F Truan MS

Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 815 students

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.4 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,790 of 2,388tied with 150 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 72 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.4 average for 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Carlos F Truan MS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.4 average for 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,790th of 2,388 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 150 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCarlos F Truan MS 7450598169 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6977.4 2,388 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8177.0 2,377 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5973.8 2,359 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5073.7 2,349 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7481.7 2,321 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement62 D−8.5 vs similar economic context · 2,227 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−6.6 vs similar economic context · 2,221 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps63 D−11.7 vs similar economic context · 2,207 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−5.7 vs similar economic context · 2,184 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−4.6 vs similar economic context · 2,221 reporting
  • Carlos F Truan MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,388 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement62D8
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps63D7
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (72), so Student Achievement (62) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level57%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,226 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level59%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level37%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 761 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,388 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
815
Economically disadvantaged
88.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.4%−13.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.8%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.2%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.7%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Carlos F Truan MS

Hispanic: 99.9%White: 0.1%
  • Hispanic 99.9%
  • White 0.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,388 reporting for every category shown · 2,388 in full cohort

African American: 14.5%Hispanic: 74.7%White: 7.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.8%
  • African American 14.5%
  • Hispanic 74.7%
  • White 7.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
815
Economically disadvantaged students
720
Emergent bilingual students
199
Special education students
153

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
21
Students in TEA mobility denominator
274
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 815 students in 2025–26, an increase of 551 (208.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
815

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+551

Increase · +208.7%

Change since 2021–22
+533

Increase · +189.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
815
Selected comparison
587.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,361 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Carlos F Truan MS
School yearStudents enrolledCarlos F Truan MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 282 First available year 628.9
2022–23 288 Increase of 6 (2.1%) 624.8
2023–24 290 Increase of 2 (0.7%) 615.8
2024–25 264 Decrease of 26 (9.0%) 609.9
2025–26 815 Increase of 551 (208.7%) 587.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
40

14.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
99

36.26 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
273

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
14.7%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting

+1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
36.26
Selected comparison
32

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting

+4.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Carlos F Truan MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 380 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 309 21 6.8% 26 8.41 12.9% 30.8
2022–23 305 12 3.9% 15 4.92 13.8% 33.8
2023–24 304 32 10.5% 55 18.09 13.9% 33.9
2024–25 273 40 14.7% 99 36.26 13.3% 32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Carlos F Truan MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 40 14.7% 99 36.26 13.3% 32
In-school suspensions 32 11.7% 53 19.41 11.6% 22.8
Out-of-school suspensions 21 7.7% 36 13.19 9.1% 14.9
DAEP placements Suppressed — 10 3.66 — 6.3
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — 10 3.66 — 4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$21k202120232025
  • Carlos F Truan MS
  • Parent district: Edcouch-Elsa ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,045
Selected comparison
$13,015

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 rated schools reporting

+$30 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,045 per student for this campus, $17,418 per student for its parent district, Edcouch-Elsa ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCarlos F Truan MSParent district: Edcouch-Elsa ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2021$7,445$14,766$14,797$9,590 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,302 rated schools reporting
2022$10,175$14,353$15,708$11,083 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,321 rated schools reporting
2023$13,113$20,090$16,792$11,636 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,347 rated schools reporting
2024$12,461$16,090$18,125$12,463 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,360 rated schools reporting
2025$13,045$17,418$18,972$13,015 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,897−$4,085 vs similar economic context
Teachers
62+21.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.1−1.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Carlos F Truan MS

Beginning: 4.5%1 to 5 years: 34.3%6 to 10 years: 23.6%11 to 20 years: 26%21 to 30 years: 8.3%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 26%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,388 reporting for every category shown · 2,388 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Carlos F Truan MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCarlos F Truan MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 62017.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108903043.