Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Carlisle School

Rusk County · Region 07: Kilgore · 656 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
417 of 2,003tied with 65 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +8 pts vs 80

  • 88 is 8 points above the 80 average among 2,003 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

91 +13.8 pts vs 77.2

  • 91 is 13.8 points above the 77.2 average among 1,871 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

85 +4.2 pts vs 80.8

  • 85 is 4.2 points above the 80.8 average among 1,890 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Carlisle School is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 417th of 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCarlisle School 8790868988 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8880.0 2,003 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8979.7 1,980 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8677.7 1,961 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9078.3 1,928 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8782.2 1,904 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement87 B+9.1 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
  • Academic Growth65 D−8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Carlisle School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement87B3
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth65D5
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (87), so School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.2%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.3%+4.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 464 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
94.0%+6.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria94.0%87.9%+6.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 499 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course27.3%59.9%−32.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA27.3%27.8%−0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.8%−10.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course36.4%33.9%+2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification87.9%38.1%+49.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.9%−6.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student12.1%7.8%+4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
37

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
22

59.5% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
15

40.5% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
37
Selected comparison
236.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
22
Selected comparison
104.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
59.5%
Selected comparison
43.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

+15.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
40.5%
Selected comparison
50.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

−10.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. KILGORE COLLEGE (003580)10

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
656
Economically disadvantaged
64.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.5%+16.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.0%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.7%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Carlisle School

African American: 3.4%Hispanic: 55%White: 39.5%Two or More Races: 2.1%
  • African American 3.4%
  • Hispanic 55%
  • White 39.5%
  • Two or More Races 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

African American: 11.2%Hispanic: 51.5%White: 30.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.2%
  • Hispanic 51.5%
  • White 30.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
656
Economically disadvantaged students
423
Emergent bilingual students
226
Special education students
138

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
88
Students in TEA mobility denominator
589
TEA-published mobility rate
14.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 656 students in 2025–26, an increase of 10 (1.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
656

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+10

Increase · +1.5%

Change since 2021–22
+48

Increase · +7.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
656
Selected comparison
624.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Carlisle School
School yearStudents enrolledCarlisle SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 608 First available year 640.4
2022–23 623 Increase of 15 (2.5%) 647
2023–24 639 Increase of 16 (2.6%) 643
2024–25 646 Increase of 7 (1.1%) 638.4
2025–26 656 Increase of 10 (1.5%) 624.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
46

6.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
54

7.77 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
695

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.6%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

−6.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
7.77
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting

−22.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Carlisle School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 657 50 7.6% 73 11.11 9.8% 19.4
2021–22 648 50 7.7% 68 10.49 12.9% 30.1
2022–23 663 42 6.3% 65 9.80 13.4% 32.2
2023–24 675 65 9.6% 100 14.81 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 695 46 6.6% 54 7.77 12.9% 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Carlisle School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 46 6.6% 54 7.77 12.9% 30.4
In-school suspensions 39 5.6% 42 6.04 11.6% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$23k20182020202220242025
  • Carlisle School
  • Parent district: Carlisle ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,335
Selected comparison
$12,669

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

−$1,334 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,335 per student for this campus, $17,424 per student for its parent district, Carlisle ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCarlisle SchoolParent district: Carlisle ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,017$12,379$13,054$7,916 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,834 rated schools reporting
2019$8,656$13,662$13,108$8,070 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2020$9,112$13,320$14,058$8,656 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021$10,452$16,531$14,797$9,085 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2022$12,086$18,878$15,708$10,418 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2023$12,249$21,629$16,792$11,137 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2024$11,795$17,769$18,125$12,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025$11,335$17,424$18,972$12,669 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$56,178−$10,218 vs similar economic context
Teachers
63+20.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.5−3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Carlisle School

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 28.3%6 to 10 years: 11.2%11 to 20 years: 30.4%21 to 30 years: 12%Over 30 years: 10.4%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 12%
  • Over 30 years 10.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Carlisle School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCarlisle School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten16.118
Grade 113.818.3
Grade 211.318.4
Grade 312.218.6
Grade 413.719
Grade 51419.8
Grade 61217.7
Secondary English9.115
Secondary languages other than English12.317.5
Secondary math6.515.9
Secondary science917.3
Secondary social studies11.917.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 19

    Closing the Gaps

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 5of 22

    Overall score

    Rusk County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 5of 22

    Per-student spending

    Rusk County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 5of 19

    Student Achievement

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 6of 19

    Relative Performance

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 18

    Science — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 345

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 345 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 19

    Reading — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 18

    Science — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 7of 18

    Science — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 19

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 9of 19

    All Subjects — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 19

    Reading — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 201913001.