+9.0 ptsvs 83 average · 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
153 of 1,530tied with 81 others
Score vs region
+10.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
25 of 208tied with 9 others
Score vs county
+0.2 ptsvs 91.8 average · 4 rated schools in Hemphill County
Score vs similar-size group
+10.0 ptsvs 82 average · 714 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
104 of 714tied with 28 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is level with the 91.8 average for 4 rated schools in Hemphill County.The current score is above the 82 average for 714 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
74%vs 55.6% avg · +18.4 pts
Masters
37%vs 24.8% avg · +12.2 pts
Among 1,486 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Canadian MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 153rd of 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 81 others).
Canadian MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 9 others).
Canadian MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 91.8 average for 4 rated schools in Hemphill County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Canadian MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82 average for 714 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 104th of 714 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 28 others).
Canadian MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,486 reporting
School Progress92 A+10.1 vs similar economic context · 1,482 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+12.7 vs similar economic context · 1,473 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,457 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,482 reporting
Canadian MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,530 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
Meets grade level74%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
Masters grade level37%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,486 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
Meets grade level81%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
Masters grade level45%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,484 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
Meets grade level71%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
Masters grade level28%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Meets grade level79%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Masters grade level43%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,374 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 769 reporting
Meets grade level57%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 769 reporting
Masters grade level36%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 769 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,530 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
142
Economically disadvantaged
45.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.6%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.2%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.2%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Canadian MS
Hispanic 40.1%
White 57.7%
American Indian 0.7%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 38.1%
White 44.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Hemphill County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
Hispanic 45.3%
White 52.4%
American Indian 0.7%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 714 reporting for every category shown · 714 in full cohort
African American 6.3%
Hispanic 45.6%
White 43.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
142
Economically disadvantaged students
64
Emergent bilingual students
8
Special education students
23
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
7
Students in TEA mobility denominator
162
TEA-published mobility rate
4.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 142 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (9.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
142
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−15
Decrease · −9.6%
Change since 2021–22
−74
Decrease · −34.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
142
Selected comparison
675.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,491 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Canadian MS
School year
Students enrolledCanadian MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
216
First available year
672.4
2022–23
191
Decrease of 25 (11.6%)
678.4
2023–24
183
Decrease of 8 (4.2%)
678.9
2024–25
157
Decrease of 26 (14.2%)
674.4
2025–26
142
Decrease of 15 (9.6%)
675.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
162
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Canadian MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
230
17
7.4%
29
12.61
9.3%
17.7
2021–22
219
17
7.8%
20
9.13
11.4%
24.4
2022–23
202
15
7.4%
33
16.34
11.8%
25.9
2023–24
193
16
8.3%
24
12.44
11.7%
26.5
2024–25
162
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Canadian MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Canadian MS
Parent district: Canadian ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,717
Selected comparison
$12,025
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 rated schools reporting
+$692 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,717 per student for this campus, $24,986 per student for its parent district, Canadian ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Canadian MS
Parent district: Canadian ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,357
$17,194
$13,054
$7,775
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,377 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,878
$27,717
$13,108
$7,980
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,144
$16,377
$14,058
$8,431
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,186
$20,634
$14,797
$8,862
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,427 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,309
$19,721
$15,708
$10,226
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,440 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,775
$19,442
$16,792
$10,609
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,457 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,333
$24,451
$18,125
$11,658
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,473 rated schools reporting
2025
$12,717
$24,986
$18,972
$12,025
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,714+$538 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−26.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.4−12.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Canadian MS
1 to 5 years 15.9%
6 to 10 years 15.9%
11 to 20 years 37.1%
21 to 30 years 27.1%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 23.7%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.2%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Hemphill County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
Beginning 1.6%
1 to 5 years 11.6%
6 to 10 years 15.5%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 37.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 714 reporting for every category shown · 714 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 22.9%
6 to 10 years 16.7%
11 to 20 years 27.8%
21 to 30 years 18.1%
Over 30 years 6.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Canadian MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCanadian MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
13.5
17.9
Secondary English
16.4
15.4
Secondary math
10.9
16.4
Secondary science
12
17.8
Secondary social studies
14.8
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 96 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 196
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 196
Reading — Approaches
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 3
6of 193
Math — Approaches
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 193 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 196
All Subjects — Meets
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 196
Reading — Meets
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure
9of 196
Reading — Masters
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
28of 643
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 643 that report this measure · tied with 3
77of 1,480
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,480 that report this measure · tied with 15
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 106901041.