Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 6 points
63 to 69 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Campbell HS
Hunt County · Region 10: Richardson · 147 students
- Current score
- 69/1002025-26
- Change
- +3 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −9.8 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,656 of 2,055tied with 94 others
- Score vs region
- −13.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 1,007 of 1,157tied with 36 others
- Score vs county
- −9.2 ptsvs 78.2 average · 39 rated schools in Hunt County
- Hunt County placement
- 29 of 39tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −13.0 ptsvs 82 average · 766 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 668 of 766tied with 19 others
- Score vs state
- −12.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,548 of 7,646tied with 273 others
D69
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County.The current score is below the 82 average for 766 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
12.3% −6.2 pts vs 18.5%
- 12.3% is 6.2 percentage points lower than the 18.5% average among 1,986 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
94.9% +1.2 pts vs 93.7%
- 94.9% is 1.2 percentage points above the 93.7% average among 1,988 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 6 points
63 to 69 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
18.2% 3rd of 183 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 10: Richardson average
12.3% −2.2 pts vs 14.5%
- 12.3% is 2.2 percentage points lower than the 14.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 6 points
63 to 69 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Six-Year Graduation Rate
100% Tied for 1st of 10 schools in Hunt County (standard accountability only) reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 3 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
18.2% 1st of 11 schools in Hunt County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 6 points
63 to 69 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
12.3% −5.3 pts vs 17.6%
- 12.3% is 5.3 percentage points lower than the 17.6% average among 706 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
94.9% +1.3 pts vs 93.6%
- 94.9% is 1.3 percentage points above the 93.6% average among 707 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 6 points
63 to 69 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
12.3% −4.4 pts vs 16.7%
- 12.3% is 4.4 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Campbell HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.8 average for 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,656th of 2,055 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 94 others).
Campbell HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,007th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 36 others).
Campbell HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 39 rated schools in Hunt County (tied with 1 other).
Campbell HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82 average for 766 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 668th of 766 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 19 others).
Campbell HS is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6,548th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 273 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 69 | 78.8 2,055 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 72 | 78.4 2,038 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | F | 56 | 76.3 2,025 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 66 | 76.8 2,000 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 66 | 81.9 1,984 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Campbell HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 71 | C | 9 |
| School Progress | 69 | D | 1 |
| Closing the Gaps | 63 | D | 7 |
| Academic Growth | 65 | D | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 69 | D | 1 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (71), so School Progress (69) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 71.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,055 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+6.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 45.0%−41.5 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 45.0% | 86.5% | −41.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 9.1% | 59.3% | −50.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 9.1% | 26.5% | −17.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 11.4% | −11.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 9.1% | 32.8% | −23.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 22.7% | 36.8% | −14.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 2.3% | −2.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 7.7% | −7.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 4.4% | −4.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 4.5% | 3.2% | +1.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 18.2% | 8.2% | +10.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 2.9% | −2.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 147
- Economically disadvantaged
- 72.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 19.7%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 27.2%+8.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.9%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 12.3%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Campbell HS
- Hispanic 40.8%
- White 53.1%
- American Indian 0.7%
- Asian 1.4%
- Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort
- African American 12.6%
- Hispanic 59.8%
- White 22%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- African American 7.5%
- Hispanic 36.3%
- White 50.3%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 766 reporting for every category shown · 766 in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 45.8%
- White 43.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 147
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 107
- Emergent bilingual students
- 29
- Special education students
- 40
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 15
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 140
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 10.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 147 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (14.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 147
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +19
Increase · +14.8%
- Change since 2021–22
- −9
Decrease · −5.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 147
- Selected comparison
- 636.9
| School year | Students enrolledCampbell HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 156 | First available year | 652.8 |
| 2022–23 | 149 | Decrease of 7 (4.5%) | 657.8 |
| 2023–24 | 134 | Decrease of 15 (10.1%) | 656.2 |
| 2024–25 | 128 | Decrease of 6 (4.5%) | 652.9 |
| 2025–26 | 147 | Increase of 19 (14.8%) | 636.9 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 25
17.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 60
42.86 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 140
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 17.9%
- Selected comparison
- 13.2%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 42.86
- Selected comparison
- 31.6
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 175 | Suppressed | — | 14 | 8.00 | — | 18.6 |
| 2021–22 | 177 | 26 | 14.7% | 48 | 27.12 | 13.0% | 30.9 |
| 2022–23 | 168 | 26 | 15.5% | 44 | 26.19 | 13.6% | 33.2 |
| 2023–24 | 151 | 35 | 23.2% | 56 | 37.09 | 13.4% | 32.8 |
| 2024–25 | 140 | 25 | 17.9% | 60 | 42.86 | 13.2% | 31.6 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 25 | 17.9% | 60 | 42.86 | 13.2% | 31.6 |
| In-school suspensions | 22 | 15.7% | 42 | 30.00 | 11.8% | 23.8 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Campbell HS
- Parent district: Campbell ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $14,467
- Selected comparison
- $13,083
For 2025, TEA reported $14,467 per student for this campus, $29,692 per student for its parent district, Campbell ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Campbell HS | Parent district: Campbell ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,892 | $11,686 | $13,054 | $8,053 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,972 | $12,747 | $13,108 | $8,203 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,927 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $9,964 | $15,226 | $14,058 | $8,753 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $10,555 | $17,207 | $14,797 | $9,299 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $11,825 | $17,301 | $15,708 | $10,566 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $11,022 | $19,585 | $16,792 | $11,228 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $12,773 | $18,542 | $18,125 | $12,312 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $14,467 | $29,692 | $18,972 | $13,083 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,300+$739 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 17−26.2 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 8.6−5.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Campbell HS
- 1 to 5 years 31.2%
- 6 to 10 years 31.2%
- 11 to 20 years 17.6%
- 21 to 30 years 14.7%
- Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 reporting for every category shown · 2,055 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.1%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.4%
- 21 to 30 years 15.4%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 766 reporting for every category shown · 766 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 23%
- 6 to 10 years 16.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27.8%
- 21 to 30 years 18%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classCampbell HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 17.6 | 17.9 |
| Secondary English | 12.8 | 15.3 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 6 | 17.9 |
| Secondary math | 11.5 | 16.2 |
| Secondary science | 14.4 | 17.5 |
| Secondary social studies | 13 | 17.4 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 11
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
1of 10
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Hunt County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
-
4of 38
Per-student spending
Hunt County · of the 38 that report this measure
-
5of 11
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
9of 11
Earned an industry-based certification
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
10of 20
Social Studies — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 20
Social Studies — Meets
Hunt County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
10of 11
College, career or military ready
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
10of 11
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
10of 11
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
10of 11
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Hunt County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 116910001.