Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cambridge Elem

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 785 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−2.4 ptsvs 89.4 average · 805 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
596 of 805tied with 39 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 89.4 average for 805 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

3.8% −4.8 pts vs 8.6%

  • 3.8% is 4.8 percentage points lower than the 8.6% average among 797 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cambridge Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 89.4 average for 805 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 596th of 805 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 39 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCambridge Elem 9189858887 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8789.4 805 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8889.5 800 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8588.4 783 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8988.7 767 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9189.7 754 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A−0.4 vs similar economic context · 793 reporting
  • School Progress82 B−3.7 vs similar economic context · 792 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B−5.9 vs similar economic context · 789 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B−1.2 vs similar economic context · 783 reporting
  • Relative Performance73 C−6.5 vs similar economic context · 792 reporting
  • Cambridge Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (805 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance73C7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level84%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 793 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 792 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 792 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 792 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 735 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 735 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 735 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (805 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
785
Economically disadvantaged
21.1%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.8%+3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.9%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.8%−4.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cambridge Elem

African American: 2.2%Hispanic: 50.4%White: 41.1%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 1.8%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 2.2%
  • Hispanic 50.4%
  • White 41.1%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 805 reporting for every category shown · 805 in full cohort

African American: 7.8%Hispanic: 25.1%White: 48.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 13%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.3%
  • African American 7.8%
  • Hispanic 25.1%
  • White 48.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 13%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
785
Economically disadvantaged students
166
Emergent bilingual students
108
Special education students
156

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
61
Students in TEA mobility denominator
840
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 785 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 21 (2.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
785

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−21

Decrease · −2.6%

Change since 2021–22
−30

Decrease · −3.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
785
Selected comparison
868.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 800 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cambridge Elem
School yearStudents enrolledCambridge ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 815 First available year 885.9
2022–23 772 Decrease of 43 (5.3%) 892.3
2023–24 773 Increase of 1 (0.1%) 885.8
2024–25 806 Increase of 33 (4.3%) 878.4
2025–26 785 Decrease of 21 (2.6%) 868.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

1.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
31

3.69 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
839

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
1.8%
Selected comparison
7.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 568 rated schools reporting

−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.69
Selected comparison
13.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 647 rated schools reporting

−10.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cambridge Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 873 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 860 12 1.4% 26 3.02 7.4% 14.4
2022–23 812 21 2.6% 28 3.45 7.6% 14.7
2023–24 815 16 2.0% 22 2.70 7.3% 14.3
2024–25 839 15 1.8% 31 3.69 7.1% 13.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cambridge Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 1.8% 31 3.69 7.1% 13.7
In-school suspensions 15 1.8% 29 3.46 6.5% 10.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Cambridge Elem
  • Parent district: Alamo Heights ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,085
Selected comparison
$11,056

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 799 rated schools reporting

−$1,971 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,085 per student for this campus, $26,637 per student for its parent district, Alamo Heights ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCambridge ElemParent district: Alamo Heights ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,117$17,313$13,054$7,403 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 705 rated schools reporting
2019$7,618$20,758$13,108$7,467 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 721 rated schools reporting
2020$8,096$21,292$14,058$7,790 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 731 rated schools reporting
2021$8,221$19,476$14,797$8,346 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 737 rated schools reporting
2022$9,084$15,959$15,708$9,389 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 753 rated schools reporting
2023$9,777$19,766$16,792$9,896 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 768 rated schools reporting
2024$10,362$20,604$18,125$10,927 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 783 rated schools reporting
2025$9,085$26,637$18,972$11,056 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 799 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,415+$604 vs similar economic context
Teachers
59+4.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.2−1.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cambridge Elem

1 to 5 years: 10.1%6 to 10 years: 22.9%11 to 20 years: 42.3%21 to 30 years: 21.4%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 10.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 42.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 805 reporting for every category shown · 805 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.6%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 4.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cambridge Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCambridge Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 120.519.1
Grade 220.319.7
Grade 322.621.2
Grade 427.420.4
Grade 519.821.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 8of 387

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Bexar County · of the 387 that report this measure

  • 10of 387

    Attendance

    Bexar County · of the 387 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015901101.