Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Caldwell Arts AcademyA91vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Caldwell Arts Academy
Smith County · Region 07: Kilgore · 627 students
Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,844 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
203 of 1,844tied with 81 others
Score vs region
+11.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
48 of 352tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
16 of 59among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+10.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,610 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
572 of 4,610tied with 260 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,844 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,610 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
68%vs 51.1% avg · +16.9 pts
Masters
36%vs 21.6% avg · +14.4 pts
Among 1,773 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Caldwell Arts Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,844 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 203rd of 1,844 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 81 others).
Caldwell Arts Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 48th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 11 others).
Caldwell Arts Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 59 rated schools in Smith County.
Caldwell Arts Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,610 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 572nd of 4,610 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 260 others).
Caldwell Arts Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,773 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,766 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,750 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+13.1 vs similar economic context · 1,720 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,766 reporting
Caldwell Arts Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,844 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
Meets grade level68%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
Masters grade level36%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,771 reporting
Meets grade level75%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,771 reporting
Masters grade level40%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,771 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Meets grade level64%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Masters grade level31%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 reporting
Meets grade level63%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 reporting
Masters grade level40%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 921 reporting
Meets grade level60%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 921 reporting
Masters grade level39%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 921 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,844 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
627
Economically disadvantaged
55.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.5%−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.7%−8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.3%−12.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Caldwell Arts Academy
African American 19.8%
Hispanic 42.4%
White 34.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,844 reporting for every category shown · 1,844 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 44.5%
White 38.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,610 reporting for every category shown · 4,610 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.4%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
627
Economically disadvantaged students
346
Emergent bilingual students
47
Special education students
67
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
563
TEA-published mobility rate
3.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 627 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
627
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+9
Increase · +1.5%
Change since 2021–22
+50
Increase · +8.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
627
Selected comparison
632.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Caldwell Arts Academy
School year
Students enrolledCaldwell Arts Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
577
First available year
636.3
2022–23
593
Increase of 16 (2.8%)
642.3
2023–24
611
Increase of 18 (3.0%)
640.5
2024–25
618
Increase of 7 (1.1%)
637.7
2025–26
627
Increase of 9 (1.5%)
632.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11
1.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
13
2.11 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
615
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.8%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,422 rated schools reporting
−10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.11
Selected comparison
27.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting
−25.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Caldwell Arts Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
571
20
3.5%
24
4.20
9.7%
18.9
2021–22
577
30
5.2%
45
7.80
12.4%
28.1
2022–23
593
31
5.2%
47
7.93
12.9%
29.6
2023–24
605
39
6.5%
63
10.41
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
615
11
1.8%
13
2.11
12.4%
27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Caldwell Arts Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
11
1.8%
13
2.11
12.4%
27.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Caldwell Arts Academy
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,321
Selected comparison
$12,296
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,816 rated schools reporting
−$2,975 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,321 per student for this campus, $14,333 per student for its parent district, Tyler ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Caldwell Arts Academy
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,883
$12,660
$13,054
$7,897
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,333
$16,047
$13,108
$8,079
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,687 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,764
$14,755
$14,058
$8,647
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,703 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,372
$15,099
$14,797
$9,033
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,719 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,304
$14,624
$15,708
$10,398
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,504
$16,225
$16,792
$10,921
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 rated schools reporting
2024
$13,703
$16,622
$18,125
$11,778
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,321
$14,333
$18,972
$12,296
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,816 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,282−$3,279 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−4.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.6−2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Caldwell Arts Academy
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 23.9%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 13.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,844 reporting for every category shown · 1,844 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,610 reporting for every category shown · 4,610 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Caldwell Arts Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCaldwell Arts Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21
17.9
Grade 1
22.7
18.2
Grade 2
23
18.4
Grade 3
22.7
18.8
Grade 4
24.3
19
Grade 5
24
19.8
Grade 6
24.6
17.6
Secondary English
16.4
14.9
Secondary languages other than English
4
17.4
Secondary math
21.3
15.8
Secondary science
21.3
17.3
Secondary social studies
21.3
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 57
Attendance
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 57
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
5of 55
Reading — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
6of 55
All Subjects — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 24
Social Studies — Masters
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
7of 55
Reading — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 50
Academic Growth
Smith County · of the 50 that report this measure
10of 48
Science — Masters
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
10of 24
Social Studies — Approaches
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 24
Social Studies — Meets
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
98of 1,773
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,773 that report this measure · tied with 14
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212905110.