+10.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,852 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
151 of 1,852tied with 49 others
Score vs region
+8.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
185 of 1,303tied with 67 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 105 rated schools in Galveston County
Galveston County placement
13 of 105tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,772 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
400 of 4,772tied with 172 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,852 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,772 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 51.1% avg · +14.9 pts
Masters
34%vs 21.5% avg · +12.5 pts
Among 1,781 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Calder Road Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,852 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 151st of 1,852 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 49 others).
Calder Road Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 67 others).
Calder Road Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 13th of 105 rated schools in Galveston County (tied with 4 others).
Calder Road Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,772 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 400th of 4,772 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 172 others).
Calder Road Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,781 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,773 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+14.6 vs similar economic context · 1,757 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,773 reporting
Calder Road Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,852 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,781 reporting
Meets grade level66%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,781 reporting
Masters grade level34%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,781 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
Meets grade level66%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
Masters grade level38%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Meets grade level67%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Masters grade level31%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,852 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
530
Economically disadvantaged
55.6%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.4%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.8%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.9%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Calder Road Elem
African American 18%
Hispanic 48.9%
White 27.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting for every category shown · 1,852 in full cohort
African American 10%
Hispanic 44.8%
White 38.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 41.5%
White 35.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,772 reporting for every category shown · 4,772 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
522
Economically disadvantaged students
290
Emergent bilingual students
91
Special education students
119
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
56
Students in TEA mobility denominator
378
TEA-published mobility rate
14.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 530 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (0.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
530
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−4
Decrease · −0.7%
Change since 2021–22
−178
Decrease · −25.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
530
Selected comparison
635.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,813 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Calder Road Elem
School year
Students enrolledCalder Road Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
708
First available year
640.7
2022–23
722
Increase of 14 (2.0%)
646.5
2023–24
566
Decrease of 156 (21.6%)
644.8
2024–25
534
Decrease of 32 (5.7%)
641.2
2025–26
530
Decrease of 4 (0.7%)
635.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
555
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Calder Road Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
717
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
765
Suppressed
—
14
1.83
—
28.1
2022–23
766
11
1.4%
12
1.57
12.9%
29.7
2023–24
617
Suppressed
—
11
1.78
—
29.8
2024–25
555
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Calder Road Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Calder Road Elem
Parent district: Dickinson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,993
Selected comparison
$12,283
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting
−$1,290 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,993 per student for this campus, $18,124 per student for its parent district, Dickinson ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Calder Road Elem
Parent district: Dickinson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,350
$15,492
$13,054
$7,928
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,065
$13,197
$13,108
$8,096
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,849
$12,049
$14,058
$8,673
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,867
$13,933
$14,797
$9,047
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,084
$17,191
$15,708
$10,455
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,741 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,325
$18,592
$16,792
$10,916
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,873
$16,357
$18,125
$11,750
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,993
$18,124
$18,972
$12,283
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,104+$558 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−5.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−4.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Calder Road Elem
Beginning 8.3%
1 to 5 years 38.9%
6 to 10 years 11.1%
11 to 20 years 36.1%
21 to 30 years 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting for every category shown · 1,852 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 14%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,772 reporting for every category shown · 4,772 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Calder Road Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCalder Road Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.4
17.9
Grade 1
18.8
18.2
Grade 2
18.8
18.4
Grade 3
21
18.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 85 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
90of 1,768
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,768 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 084901109.