txschools.net
Menu

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Bridge City Elem

Orange County · Region 05: Beaumont · 767 students

Learn more & enroll

C73

Bridge City Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.7 average of the 1,583 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 11 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 83.

Ranks 6,052nd of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 160 others), and 89th of 150 in Region 05: Beaumont (tied with 4 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Spending per student
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
90807060 Schools like this oneTexas averageBridge City Elem 8480767873 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26C7382.781.3
2024-25C7883.181.2
2023-24C7681.078.9
2022-23B8081.579.1
2021-22B8483.983.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Bridge City Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar 82.7 · region 74.1
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar 81.8 · region 75
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar 80 · region 72.8
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar 76.3 · region 70.3
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar 79.3 · region 72.6
  • Bridge City Elem
  • Similar student population (1,583)
  • Region 05: Beaumont (150)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
767
Economically disadvantaged
46.5%−0.7 pts vs similar
English learners
15.5%+3.1 pts vs similar
Special education
18.3%−0.1 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.3%+0.6 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
9.5%−4.2 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 2%Hispanic: 24.3%White: 67.1%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 2.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 2%
  • Hispanic 24.3%
  • White 67.1%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 2.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$8k$16k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Bridge City Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$61,843−$5,243 vs similar
Teachers
45
Students per staff member
17.1

Teaching experience

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 19.8%6 to 10 years: 33%11 to 20 years: 24.3%21 to 30 years: 10.9%Over 30 years: 5.6%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 19.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 33%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.9%
  • Over 30 years 5.6%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 2of 22

    Attendance

    Orange County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 22

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Orange County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 9of 23

    Average teacher salary

    Orange County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 1of 23

    Per-student spending

    Orange County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 181901102.