Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 4.2 points above the 77.8 average among 2,174 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Bowie MS
Ector County · Region 18: Midland · 852 students
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- +13 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +4.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,174 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 757 of 2,174tied with 96 others
- Score vs region
- +4.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland
- Region 18: Midland placement
- 56 of 157tied with 6 others
- Score vs county
- +4.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 42 rated schools in Ector County
- Ector County placement
- 14 of 42tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +1.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,432 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,689 of 3,432tied with 122 others
- Score vs state
- +0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 66 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 2,174 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland.The current score is above the 77.9 average for 42 rated schools in Ector County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,432 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 9 points
73 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 7.1 points above the 74.9 average among 1,991 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-context average
82 +3 pts vs 79
- 82 is 3 points above the 79 average among 2,005 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 4.2 points above the 77.8 average among 157 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 9 points
73 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 6.4 points above the 75.6 average among 141 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Region 18: Midland average
82 +5.4 pts vs 76.6
- 82 is 5.4 points above the 76.6 average among 144 schools in Region 18: Midland reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 4.1 points above the 77.9 average among 42 schools in Ector County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 9 points
73 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 6.1 points above the 75.9 average among 38 schools in Ector County reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Ector County average
82 +5.3 pts vs 76.7
- 82 is 5.3 points above the 76.7 average among 38 schools in Ector County reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 9 points
73 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 3.6 points above the 78.4 average among 3,362 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-size average
82 +5.4 pts vs 76.6
- 82 is 5.4 points above the 76.6 average among 3,335 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 9 points
73 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 3.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Texas average
82 +6.3 pts vs 75.7
- 82 is 6.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bowie MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 2,174 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 757th of 2,174 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 96 others).
Bowie MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 56th of 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland (tied with 6 others).
Bowie MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 42 rated schools in Ector County. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 42 rated schools in Ector County (tied with 2 others).
Bowie MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,432 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,689th of 3,432 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 122 others).
Bowie MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,846th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 294 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 66 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 77.8 2,174 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 76 | 77.4 2,162 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 71 | 74.9 2,148 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 65 | 75.4 2,131 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 69 | 81.7 2,110 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Bowie MS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,174 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 71 | C | 9 |
| School Progress | 82 | B | 8 |
| Closing the Gaps | 82 | B | 8 |
| Academic Growth | 82 | B | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 79 | C | 1 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,174 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 852
- Economically disadvantaged
- 79.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 24.4%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 18.5%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 91.9%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 30.0%+9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bowie MS
- African American 2.8%
- Hispanic 86%
- White 8.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,174 reporting for every category shown · 2,174 in full cohort
- African American 14%
- Hispanic 67.4%
- White 13.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
- African American 3.4%
- Hispanic 72.1%
- White 20.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison average For Ector County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
- African American 3.4%
- Hispanic 81.4%
- White 12%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,432 reporting for every category shown · 3,432 in full cohort
- African American 12.5%
- Hispanic 52.9%
- White 24.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 852
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 680
- Emergent bilingual students
- 208
- Special education students
- 158
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 159
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 972
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 16.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 852 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (2.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 852
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −22
Decrease · −2.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- −161
Decrease · −15.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 852
- Selected comparison
- 630.4
| School year | Students enrolledBowie MS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 1,013 | First available year | 654.2 |
| 2022–23 | 914 | Decrease of 99 (9.8%) | 657.7 |
| 2023–24 | 872 | Decrease of 42 (4.6%) | 651.8 |
| 2024–25 | 874 | Increase of 2 (0.2%) | 649 |
| 2025–26 | 852 | Decrease of 22 (2.5%) | 630.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 168
17.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 401
41.81 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 959
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 17.5%
- Selected comparison
- 13.4%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 41.81
- Selected comparison
- 32.6
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 1,271 | 239 | 18.8% | 773 | 60.82 | 8.5% | 16.9 |
| 2021–22 | 1,079 | 182 | 16.9% | 397 | 36.79 | 12.9% | 31.1 |
| 2022–23 | 1,017 | 238 | 23.4% | 496 | 48.77 | 13.8% | 34.3 |
| 2023–24 | 950 | 261 | 27.5% | 647 | 68.11 | 13.7% | 34.2 |
| 2024–25 | 959 | 168 | 17.5% | 401 | 41.81 | 13.4% | 32.6 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 168 | 17.5% | 401 | 41.81 | 13.4% | 32.6 |
| In-school suspensions | 34 | 3.5% | 47 | 4.90 | 11.8% | 23.6 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 139 | 14.5% | 291 | 30.34 | 8.2% | 12.9 |
| DAEP placements | 44 | 4.6% | 56 | 5.84 | 5.4% | 6.5 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | 46 | 4.80 | — | 4.5 |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | 10 | 1.04 | — | 3.9 |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Bowie MS
- Parent district: Ector County ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,234
- Selected comparison
- $13,056
For 2025, TEA reported $10,234 per student for this campus, $13,905 per student for its parent district, Ector County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Bowie MS | Parent district: Ector County ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,545 | $8,820 | $13,054 | $8,121 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,045 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,459 | $9,133 | $13,108 | $8,253 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,454 | $9,712 | $14,058 | $8,765 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,629 | $11,838 | $14,797 | $9,397 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,093 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $10,946 | $12,512 | $15,708 | $10,821 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $10,576 | $13,039 | $16,792 | $11,273 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,131 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $13,587 | $13,842 | $18,125 | $12,268 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,147 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,234 | $13,905 | $18,972 | $13,056 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,161 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,380+$353 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 60+16.6 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14.2+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bowie MS
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 40%
- 6 to 10 years 14.7%
- 11 to 20 years 16.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,174 reporting for every category shown · 2,174 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 27.7%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.8%
- 1 to 5 years 27.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 24.1%
- 21 to 30 years 13.1%
- Over 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison average For Ector County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 29.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 25.9%
- 21 to 30 years 12.2%
- Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,432 reporting for every category shown · 3,432 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 26.8%
- 6 to 10 years 20.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classBowie MS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 20 | 17.8 |
| Secondary English | 18.2 | 15.3 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 36.9 | 18.2 |
| Secondary math | 19.9 | 16.6 |
| Secondary science | 18.1 | 17.8 |
| Secondary social studies | 19.4 | 17.8 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
3of 41
Per-student spending
Ector County · of the 41 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
-
5of 38
Academic Growth
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 38
Math — Meets
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 12
Social Studies — Approaches
Ector County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 068901043.