Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Blooming Grove HS

Navarro County · Region 12: Waco · 295 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+4.7 ptsvs 82.3 average · 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
499 of 1,652tied with 87 others
B87

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 47.6% avg · +14.4 pts
Masters
25%vs 19.4% avg · +5.6 pts

Among 1,590 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

87 +4.7 pts vs 82.3

  • 87 is 4.7 points above the 82.3 average among 1,652 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

89 +9.4 pts vs 79.6

  • 89 is 9.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,580 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Blooming Grove HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 499th of 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 87 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBlooming Grove HS 89868987 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8782.3 1,652 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8982.6 1,625 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8680.5 1,599 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8981.1 1,580 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—83.6 1,558 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement84 B+1.9 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,593 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps89 B+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,580 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+10.0 vs similar economic context · 1,564 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,593 reporting
  • Blooming Grove HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,652 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement84B6
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps89B1
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,476 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 824 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,652 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.7%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
94.9%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
95.2%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 438 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
86.0%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria86.0%88.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course36.9%59.4%−22.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA7.7%30.0%−22.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.0%−11.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course9.2%34.0%−24.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification69.2%38.5%+30.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree1.5%4.4%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.6%−4.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness6.2%3.0%+3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.7%7.3%+0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.5%3.4%−1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
59

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
29

49.2% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
29

49.2% of graduates

Not trackable
1

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
59
Selected comparison
220.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
29
Selected comparison
96.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
49.2%
Selected comparison
45.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

+3.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
49.2%
Selected comparison
49.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−0.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
1.7%
Selected comparison
4.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−2.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. NAVARRO COLLEGE (003593)14

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
295
Economically disadvantaged
48.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.4%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.8%−11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.8%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Blooming Grove HS

African American: 2%Hispanic: 35.7%White: 58.5%American Indian: 0.3%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 2%
  • Hispanic 35.7%
  • White 58.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40%White: 42.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40%
  • White 42.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
294
Economically disadvantaged students
143
Emergent bilingual students
54
Special education students
20

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
26
Students in TEA mobility denominator
301
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 295 students in 2025–26, an increase of 7 (2.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
295

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+7

Increase · +2.4%

Change since 2021–22
+20

Increase · +7.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
295
Selected comparison
657.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Blooming Grove HS
School yearStudents enrolledBlooming Grove HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 275 First available year 657.2
2022–23 267 Decrease of 8 (2.9%) 662.5
2023–24 279 Increase of 12 (4.5%) 662.2
2024–25 288 Increase of 9 (3.2%) 659.2
2025–26 295 Increase of 7 (2.4%) 657.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
47

15.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
79

26.25 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
301

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
15.6%
Selected comparison
11.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 rated schools reporting

+3.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
26.25
Selected comparison
26.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,380 rated schools reporting

−0.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Blooming Grove HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 307 23 7.5% 37 12.05 9.5% 18
2021–22 290 53 18.3% 138 47.59 11.7% 25.6
2022–23 289 53 18.3% 107 37.02 12.2% 27.5
2023–24 298 41 13.8% 81 27.18 12.2% 27.9
2024–25 301 47 15.6% 79 26.25 11.9% 26.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Blooming Grove HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 47 15.6% 79 26.25 11.9% 26.3
In-school suspensions 41 13.6% 56 18.60 10.7% 20.2
Out-of-school suspensions 11 3.6% 12 3.99 6.0% 8.4
DAEP placements 11 3.6% 11 3.65 4.4% 5.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$30k$53k20182020202220242025
  • Blooming Grove HS
  • Parent district: Blooming Grove ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$23,516
Selected comparison
$12,071

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

+$11,445 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $23,516 per student for this campus, $17,742 per student for its parent district, Blooming Grove ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBlooming Grove HSParent district: Blooming Grove ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,375$9,773$13,054$7,827 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 rated schools reporting
2019$10,445$10,667$13,108$8,015 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2020$10,962$11,414$14,058$8,515 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 rated schools reporting
2021$10,647$15,501$14,797$8,914 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 rated schools reporting
2022$12,442$13,064$15,708$10,243 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 rated schools reporting
2023$14,505$13,692$16,792$10,740 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,579 rated schools reporting
2024$50,139$23,635$18,125$11,619 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,597 rated schools reporting
2025$23,516$17,742$18,972$12,071 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,764−$1,245 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−21.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.6−6.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Blooming Grove HS

Beginning: 12.5%1 to 5 years: 14.4%6 to 10 years: 29.6%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 14.4%
  • Beginning 12.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 29.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.7%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Blooming Grove HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBlooming Grove HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English15.215.2
Secondary math17.616.1
Secondary science15.417.6
Secondary social studies2017.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

6 measures

  • 1of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 20

    Per-student spending

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 1of 10

    Social Studies — Meets

    Navarro County · of the 10 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

10 measures

  • 2of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 20

    Math — Meets

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Navarro County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 10

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Navarro County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 2of 10

    Social Studies — Masters

    Navarro County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Overall score

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Academic Growth

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Math — Masters

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Science — Meets

    Navarro County · of the 14 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 20

    Student Achievement

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    Relative Performance

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 20

    School Progress

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 85

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Region 12: Waco · of the 85 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Navarro County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 175902001.