Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bloomburg School

Cass County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 202 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.0 ptsvs 78 average · 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
338 of 2,110tied with 44 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78 average for 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 8 points

82 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 14.8 points above the 75.2 average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

88 +10 pts vs 78

  • 88 is 10 points above the 78 average among 2,110 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

87 +7.8 pts vs 79.2

  • 87 is 7.8 points above the 79.2 average among 1,946 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bloomburg School is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78 average for 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 338th of 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 44 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBloomburg School 8779828788 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8878.0 2,110 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8777.6 2,100 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8275.1 2,086 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7975.6 2,066 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8781.6 2,046 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement87 B+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,951 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,946 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+14.8 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,946 reporting
  • Bloomburg School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,110 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement87B3
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,941 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 816 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,110 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
94.0%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria94.0%85.9%+8.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course27.8%58.3%−30.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA5.6%24.5%−18.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.8%−11.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course33.3%31.0%+2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification72.2%36.8%+35.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.6%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.3%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.6%8.2%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces5.6%2.9%+2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
202
Economically disadvantaged
77.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.5%−24.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.4%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.0%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
31.0%+11.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bloomburg School

African American: 1.5%Hispanic: 8.4%White: 86.1%Asian: 0.5%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 1.5%
  • Hispanic 8.4%
  • White 86.1%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 reporting for every category shown · 2,110 in full cohort

African American: 13.9%Hispanic: 65%White: 16.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 13.9%
  • Hispanic 65%
  • White 16.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
202
Economically disadvantaged students
157
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
29

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
40
Students in TEA mobility denominator
214
TEA-published mobility rate
18.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 202 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 27 (11.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
202

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−27

Decrease · −11.8%

Change since 2021–22
−39

Decrease · −16.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
202
Selected comparison
639.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bloomburg School
School yearStudents enrolledBloomburg SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 241 First available year 658.4
2022–23 256 Increase of 15 (6.2%) 661.5
2023–24 243 Decrease of 13 (5.1%) 658.2
2024–25 229 Decrease of 14 (5.8%) 656.7
2025–26 202 Decrease of 27 (11.8%) 639.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19

7.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
27

10.63 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
254

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.5%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting

−5.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.63
Selected comparison
32.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,687 rated schools reporting

−21.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bloomburg School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 282 21 7.5% 31 10.99 8.8% 17.4
2021–22 275 12 4.4% 20 7.27 12.9% 31.1
2022–23 274 25 9.1% 46 16.79 13.7% 34
2023–24 270 27 10.0% 52 19.26 13.7% 33.9
2024–25 254 19 7.5% 27 10.63 13.3% 32.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bloomburg School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 19 7.5% 27 10.63 13.3% 32.3
In-school suspensions 13 5.1% 18 7.09 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Bloomburg School
  • Parent district: Bloomburg ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,675
Selected comparison
$13,035

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting

−$1,360 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,675 per student for this campus, $18,052 per student for its parent district, Bloomburg ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBloomburg SchoolParent district: Bloomburg ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,141$11,691$13,054$8,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting
2019$12,617$12,097$13,108$8,225 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
2020$9,185$13,743$14,058$8,753 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 rated schools reporting
2021$10,123$14,578$14,797$9,346 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2022$10,654$17,341$15,708$10,700 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,047 rated schools reporting
2023$10,071$15,843$16,792$11,261 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 rated schools reporting
2024$11,026$17,539$18,125$12,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,085 rated schools reporting
2025$11,675$18,052$18,972$13,035 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$55,525−$11,282 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.8−5.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bloomburg School

Beginning: 17.4%1 to 5 years: 21.7%6 to 10 years: 13%11 to 20 years: 21.7%21 to 30 years: 26.1%
  • Beginning 17.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 13%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 26.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 reporting for every category shown · 2,110 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bloomburg School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBloomburg School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1818
Grade 11418.3
Grade 21818.4
Grade 31818.8
Grade 41319
Grade 58.620
Grade 69.818
Secondary English5.915.4
Secondary languages other than English3.318.3
Secondary math6.516.5
Secondary science6.117.8
Secondary social studies5.317.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

18 measures

  • 4of 45

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 4of 15

    Closing the Gaps

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 16

    Overall score

    Cass County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    School Progress

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 15

    Relative Performance

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 16

    Per-student spending

    Cass County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 6of 15

    Student Achievement

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 6of 15

    Reading — Approaches

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 6of 15

    Reading — Masters

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Cass County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 15

    Math — Masters

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 14

    Science — Meets

    Cass County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Social Studies — Masters

    Cass County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 15

    Reading — Meets

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 10of 45

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 10of 15

    Math — Meets

    Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 11

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Cass County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Social Studies — Meets

    Cass County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 034909001.