Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Bland ElemB85vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Bland Elem
Hunt County · Region 10: Richardson · 392 students
Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
611 of 1,997tied with 69 others
Score vs region
+2.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
522 of 1,157tied with 44 others
Score vs county
+6.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 39 rated schools in Hunt County
Hunt County placement
15 of 39tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+4.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 3,915 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,391 of 3,915tied with 136 others
Score vs state
+3.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,064 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.7 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 3,915 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
54%vs 47.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Masters
29%vs 19.3% avg · +9.7 pts
Among 1,888 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bland Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 611th of 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).
Bland Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 522nd of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 44 others).
Bland Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 39 rated schools in Hunt County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 39 rated schools in Hunt County (tied with 1 other).
Bland Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 3,915 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,391st of 3,915 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 136 others).
Bland Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement83 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,888 reporting
School Progress86 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
Closing the Gaps81 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,864 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,822 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
Bland Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
83
B
7
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
81
B
9
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so
Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Meets grade level54%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Masters grade level29%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Meets grade level55%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Masters grade level31%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Meets grade level50%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
Meets grade level65%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
Masters grade level43%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
392
Economically disadvantaged
65.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
31.5%+13.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.9%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.2%−10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bland Elem
African American 1.5%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 40%
American Indian 0.8%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort
African American 11.6%
Hispanic 52.8%
White 29.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
African American 7.5%
Hispanic 36.3%
White 50.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 0.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,915 reporting for every category shown · 3,915 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 26.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
390
Economically disadvantaged students
257
Emergent bilingual students
123
Special education students
97
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
307
TEA-published mobility rate
9.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 392 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
392
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
0
No change
Change since 2021–22
+38
Increase · +10.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
392
Selected comparison
627.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Bland Elem
School year
Students enrolledBland Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
354
First available year
643.2
2022–23
374
Increase of 20 (5.6%)
648.8
2023–24
394
Increase of 20 (5.3%)
647.3
2024–25
392
Decrease of 2 (0.5%)
643.4
2025–26
392
No change
627.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
13
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
15
3.62 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
414
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting
−9.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.62
Selected comparison
30.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 rated schools reporting
−26.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bland Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
347
Suppressed
—
12
3.46
—
19.3
2021–22
389
14
3.6%
19
4.88
12.9%
30.3
2022–23
403
Suppressed
—
12
2.98
—
32.2
2023–24
422
13
3.1%
19
4.50
13.2%
31.8
2024–25
414
13
3.1%
15
3.62
12.8%
30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bland Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
13
3.1%
15
3.62
12.8%
30.3
In-school suspensions
13
3.1%
15
3.62
11.5%
23
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Bland Elem
Parent district: Bland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,701
Selected comparison
$12,736
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting
−$4,035 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,701 per student for this campus, $16,796 per student for its parent district, Bland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Bland Elem
Parent district: Bland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,161
$11,670
$13,054
$7,962
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,445
$12,254
$13,108
$8,115
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,142
$13,177
$14,058
$8,692
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,996
$14,585
$14,797
$9,162
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,489
$15,146
$15,708
$10,466
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,260
$16,372
$16,792
$11,189
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,351
$15,813
$18,125
$12,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,701
$16,796
$18,972
$12,736
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,569−$2,906 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−18.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.2+2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bland Elem
1 to 5 years 16.3%
6 to 10 years 24.2%
11 to 20 years 40.4%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Hunt County · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 27.7%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,915 reporting for every category shown · 3,915 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bland Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBland Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21.7
18
Grade 1
22.6
18.3
Grade 2
18.9
18.4
Grade 3
17.1
18.7
Grade 4
17.9
19
Grade 5
18.1
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 36
All Subjects — Masters
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 37
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hunt County · of the 37 that report this measure
3of 28
Science — Masters
Hunt County · of the 28 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
5of 36
Reading — Masters
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 36
Math — Masters
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure
8of 36
Math — Meets
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 28
Science — Meets
Hunt County · of the 28 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 37
Attendance
Hunt County · of the 37 that report this measure
10of 36
Relative Performance
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 36
All Subjects — Approaches
Hunt County · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 116915101.