Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Birdwell SchoolA95vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Birdwell School
Smith County · Region 07: Kilgore · 614 students
Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.5 ptsvs 79.5 average · 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
63 of 2,025tied with 22 others
Score vs region
+15.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
11 of 352tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+12.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
3 of 59among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+14.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,641 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
119 of 4,641tied with 59 others
Score vs state
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.5 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,641 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
86%vs 41.5% avg · +44.5 pts
Masters
52%vs 15.8% avg · +36.2 pts
Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
3rd of 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Birdwell School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.5 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 63rd of 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 22 others).
Birdwell School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 11th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 6 others).
Birdwell School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 59 rated schools in Smith County.
Birdwell School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,641 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 119th of 4,641 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 59 others).
Birdwell School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,912 reporting
School Progress95 A+14.4 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+17.4 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
Relative Performance95 A+16.1 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
Birdwell School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
95
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so
Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level96%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Meets grade level83%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Masters grade level52%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Meets grade level86%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Masters grade level58%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Meets grade level86%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Masters grade level52%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Meets grade level68%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Masters grade level33%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 reporting
Meets grade level81%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 reporting
Masters grade level46%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
614
Economically disadvantaged
67.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
49.2%+29.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.9%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.1%−15.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Birdwell School
African American 2.4%
Hispanic 89.7%
White 6.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,641 reporting for every category shown · 4,641 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
614
Economically disadvantaged students
416
Emergent bilingual students
302
Special education students
61
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
9
Students in TEA mobility denominator
436
TEA-published mobility rate
2.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 614 students in 2025–26, an increase of 46 (8.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
614
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+46
Increase · +8.1%
Change since 2021–22
+173
Increase · +39.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
614
Selected comparison
635.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,990 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Birdwell School
School year
Students enrolledBirdwell School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
441
First available year
647.4
2022–23
477
Increase of 36 (8.2%)
654.7
2023–24
511
Increase of 34 (7.1%)
654.4
2024–25
568
Increase of 57 (11.2%)
651.5
2025–26
614
Increase of 46 (8.1%)
635.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22
3.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
27
4.78 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
565
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,552 rated schools reporting
−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.78
Selected comparison
30.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,657 rated schools reporting
−25.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Birdwell School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
412
10
2.4%
11
2.67
9.7%
19.3
2021–22
446
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
472
13
2.8%
27
5.72
13.3%
32
2023–24
511
19
3.7%
26
5.09
13.2%
31.8
2024–25
565
22
3.9%
27
4.78
12.8%
30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Birdwell School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
22
3.9%
27
4.78
12.8%
30.3
In-school suspensions
14
2.5%
15
2.65
11.5%
23
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
1.77
—
10.7
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Birdwell School
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,492
Selected comparison
$13,210
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
−$4,718 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,492 per student for this campus, $14,333 per student for its parent district, Tyler ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Birdwell School
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,103
$12,660
$13,054
$7,999
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,858
$16,047
$13,108
$8,163
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,868
$14,755
$14,058
$8,719
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,077
$15,099
$14,797
$9,207
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,413
$14,624
$15,708
$10,493
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,315
$16,225
$16,792
$11,211
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,958 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,459
$16,622
$18,125
$12,360
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,492
$14,333
$18,972
$13,210
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,008+$1,499 vs similar economic context
Teachers
34−8.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18+4.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Birdwell School
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 17.5%
11 to 20 years 33.3%
21 to 30 years 20.8%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.8%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,641 reporting for every category shown · 4,641 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Birdwell School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBirdwell School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
24.5
17.9
Secondary English
20
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
14.5
17.7
Secondary math
19
16
Secondary science
22.3
17.3
Secondary social studies
22.3
17.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
1of 57
Attendance
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 57
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
1of 55
Math — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 55
Math — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
10 measures
2of 55
School Progress
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
Relative Performance
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
All Subjects — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
All Subjects — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 55
Reading — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
Reading — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
Reading — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 59
Overall score
Smith County · of the 59 that report this measure
3of 55
All Subjects — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
3of 55
Math — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 50
Academic Growth
Smith County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 24
Social Studies — Meets
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
4of 24
Social Studies — Masters
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
10of 48
Science — Approaches
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
56of 1,887
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 18
69of 1,912
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,912 that report this measure · tied with 25
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212905103.