+10.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,088 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
285 of 2,088tied with 59 others
Score vs region
+5.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso
Region 19: El Paso placement
65 of 207tied with 10 others
Score vs county
+4.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 203 rated schools in El Paso County
El Paso County placement
64 of 203tied with 10 others
Score vs similar-size group
+8.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,145 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
969 of 4,145tied with 150 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.2 average for 2,088 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 43.7% avg · +14.3 pts
Masters
28%vs 17.3% avg · +10.7 pts
Among 1,936 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bill Sybert School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 2,088 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 285th of 2,088 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).
Bill Sybert School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 65th of 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 10 others).
Bill Sybert School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 203 rated schools in El Paso County (tied with 10 others).
Bill Sybert School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 969th of 4,145 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 150 others).
Bill Sybert School is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement83 B+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,936 reporting
School Progress89 B+9.6 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
Closing the Gaps89 B+13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+13.4 vs similar economic context · 1,877 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
Bill Sybert School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,088 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
83
B
7
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
89
B
1
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
89
B
1
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so
Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level79%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Meets grade level58%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Masters grade level28%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Meets grade level64%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Masters grade level34%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
Meets grade level57%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
Masters grade level26%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,783 reporting
Meets grade level58%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,783 reporting
Masters grade level27%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,783 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Meets grade level40%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,088 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
734
Economically disadvantaged
76.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
30.5%+5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.9%−10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bill Sybert School
African American 1.1%
Hispanic 92.1%
White 5.5%
Asian 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,088 reporting for every category shown · 2,088 in full cohort
African American 13.4%
Hispanic 63.3%
White 18%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 91.2%
White 4.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
African American 2%
Hispanic 91.3%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
732
Economically disadvantaged students
557
Emergent bilingual students
223
Special education students
135
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
42
Students in TEA mobility denominator
621
TEA-published mobility rate
6.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 734 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (1.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
734
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −1.9%
Change since 2021–22
−43
Decrease · −5.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
734
Selected comparison
637.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Bill Sybert School
School year
Students enrolledBill Sybert School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
777
First available year
654.8
2022–23
829
Increase of 52 (6.7%)
658
2023–24
748
Decrease of 81 (9.8%)
655.3
2024–25
748
No change
653.2
2025–26
734
Decrease of 14 (1.9%)
637.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
81
10.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
161
21.18 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
760
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
10.7%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,565 rated schools reporting
−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
21.18
Selected comparison
31.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting
−10.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bill Sybert School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
841
Suppressed
—
14
1.66
—
17.8
2021–22
844
102
12.1%
177
20.97
12.9%
30.7
2022–23
869
88
10.1%
179
20.60
13.5%
33.4
2023–24
796
114
14.3%
265
33.29
13.5%
33.2
2024–25
760
81
10.7%
161
21.18
13.2%
31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bill Sybert School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
81
10.7%
161
21.18
13.2%
31.8
In-school suspensions
80
10.5%
138
18.16
11.6%
23.3
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
13
1.71
—
12.2
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Bill Sybert School
Parent district: Socorro ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,077
Selected comparison
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 rated schools reporting
−$2,971 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,077 per student for this campus, $12,991 per student for its parent district, Socorro ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Bill Sybert School
Parent district: Socorro ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,028
$10,949
$13,054
$8,038
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,271
$11,576
$13,108
$8,197
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,978 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,111
$12,325
$14,058
$8,738
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,068
$15,614
$14,797
$9,309
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,461
$15,032
$15,708
$10,605
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,372
$14,870
$16,792
$11,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,042 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,236
$14,957
$18,125
$12,253
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,077
$12,991
$18,972
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,803+$85 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+0.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8+2.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bill Sybert School
Beginning 7.3%
1 to 5 years 13.8%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.8%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,088 reporting for every category shown · 2,088 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 27.5%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 18.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34%
21 to 30 years 21.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bill Sybert School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBill Sybert School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.4
18
Grade 1
19.9
18.2
Grade 2
17.2
18.3
Grade 3
19.1
18.7
Grade 4
19.1
19
Grade 5
18.2
20
Grade 6
16.3
17.9
Secondary English
10.6
15.4
Secondary languages other than English
6.3
18.1
Secondary math
17.1
16.4
Secondary science
21.1
17.7
Secondary social studies
21.1
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
105of 1,934
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,934 that report this measure · tied with 23
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071909122.