−1.4 ptsvs 83.4 average · 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
854 of 1,498tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+0.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
Region 17: Lubbock placement
90 of 182tied with 5 others
Score vs county
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 84 rated schools in Lubbock County
Lubbock County placement
41 of 84tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+1.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,684 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,172 of 4,684tied with 188 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83.4 average for 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,684 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
59%vs 56.2% avg · +2.8 pts
Masters
27%vs 25.2% avg · +1.8 pts
Among 1,455 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bennett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.4 average for 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 854th of 1,498 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Bennett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 90th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 5 others).
Bennett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 41st of 84 rated schools in Lubbock County (tied with 4 others).
Bennett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,684 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,172nd of 4,684 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 188 others).
Bennett Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+1.4 vs similar economic context · 1,455 reporting
School Progress81 B−1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,452 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,442 reporting
Academic Growth75 C−1.9 vs similar economic context · 1,425 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+1.5 vs similar economic context · 1,452 reporting
Bennett Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,498 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
75
C
5
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so
School Progress (81) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Meets grade level59%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Masters grade level27%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
Meets grade level65%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
Masters grade level31%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,454 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
Meets grade level54%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
Masters grade level26%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Meets grade level51%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Masters grade level21%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,498 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
600
Economically disadvantaged
44.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.3%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
32.0%+13.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.6%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bennett Elem
African American 3.5%
Hispanic 43.2%
White 46.9%
Asian 1%
Two or More Races 5.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting for every category shown · 1,498 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 37.8%
White 44.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 61%
White 30.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,684 reporting for every category shown · 4,684 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
597
Economically disadvantaged students
263
Emergent bilingual students
14
Special education students
191
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
63
Students in TEA mobility denominator
522
TEA-published mobility rate
12.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 600 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (1.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
600
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−10
Decrease · −1.6%
Change since 2021–22
−273
Decrease · −31.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
600
Selected comparison
678.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Bennett Elem
School year
Students enrolledBennett Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
873
First available year
676.9
2022–23
876
Increase of 3 (0.3%)
682.6
2023–24
915
Increase of 39 (4.5%)
682.1
2024–25
610
Decrease of 305 (33.3%)
679.2
2025–26
600
Decrease of 10 (1.6%)
678.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
39
5.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
54
8.11 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
666
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.9%
Selected comparison
11.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,156 rated schools reporting
−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
8.11
Selected comparison
24.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,240 rated schools reporting
−16.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bennett Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
776
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
919
22
2.4%
31
3.37
11.3%
24.3
2022–23
921
53
5.8%
79
8.58
11.7%
25.5
2023–24
974
60
6.2%
106
10.88
11.6%
26.1
2024–25
666
39
5.9%
54
8.11
11.3%
24.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bennett Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
39
5.9%
54
8.11
11.3%
24.5
In-school suspensions
38
5.7%
48
7.21
10.1%
18.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Bennett Elem
Parent district: Frenship ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,752
Selected comparison
$12,029
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 rated schools reporting
−$2,277 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,752 per student for this campus, $21,893 per student for its parent district, Frenship ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Bennett Elem
Parent district: Frenship ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,573
$10,914
$13,054
$7,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,348 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,492
$10,823
$13,108
$8,018
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,453
$10,618
$14,058
$8,452
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,194
$12,442
$14,797
$8,862
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,372
$14,695
$15,708
$10,249
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,839
$20,343
$16,792
$10,654
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,430 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,160
$23,331
$18,125
$11,690
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,752
$21,893
$18,972
$12,029
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,468 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,140−$3,105 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−2.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.4−6.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bennett Elem
1 to 5 years 7.3%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29.1%
21 to 30 years 36.6%
Over 30 years 7.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,498 reporting for every category shown · 1,498 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.4%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,684 reporting for every category shown · 4,684 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bennett Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBennett Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
14.2
18
Grade 1
14
18.4
Grade 2
17.9
18.6
Grade 3
18.3
19.3
Grade 4
19.3
19.2
Grade 5
19.8
20.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152907107.