Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Benavides Elem

Zapata County · Region 01: Edinburg · 42 students

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.3 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
473 of 2,084tied with 77 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 4 points

82 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 7.3 points above the 78.7 average among 2,084 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 11 points

77 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 13.2 points above the 74.8 average among 1,949 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
59%vs 44.7% avg · +14.3 pts
Masters
26%vs 17.7% avg · +8.3 pts

Among 1,949 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Benavides Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.7 average for 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 473rd of 2,084 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBenavides Elem 8883898286 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8678.7 2,084 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8278.3 2,067 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8976.2 2,055 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8376.7 2,029 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8881.8 2,013 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,949 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps78 C+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,928 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,882 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+11.8 vs similar economic context · 1,943 reporting
  • Benavides Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps78C2
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance90A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 70.4% · 1,794 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 41.4% · 1,794 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 17.7% · 1,794 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,084 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
42
Economically disadvantaged
73.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.3%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.9%−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.2%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Benavides Elem

Hispanic: 100%
  • Hispanic 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort

African American: 12.9%Hispanic: 60.6%White: 20.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.9%
  • Hispanic 60.6%
  • White 20.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
42
Economically disadvantaged students
31
Emergent bilingual students
6
Special education students
5

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
3
Students in TEA mobility denominator
38
TEA-published mobility rate
7.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 42 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (17.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
42

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−9

Decrease · −17.6%

Change since 2021–22
−22

Decrease · −34.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
42
Selected comparison
639.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Benavides Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBenavides ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 64 First available year 656.4
2022–23 61 Decrease of 3 (4.7%) 660.4
2023–24 61 No change 657.7
2024–25 51 Decrease of 10 (16.4%) 655.4
2025–26 42 Decrease of 9 (17.6%) 639.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
49

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Benavides Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 81 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 60 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 62 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 62 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 49 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Benavides Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$23k20182020202220242025
  • Benavides Elem
  • Parent district: Zapata County ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$18,020
Selected comparison
$13,185

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

+$4,836 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $18,020 per student for this campus, $15,950 per student for its parent district, Zapata County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBenavides ElemParent district: Zapata County ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,613$10,878$13,054$8,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2019$10,970$11,171$13,108$8,196 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2020$12,135$10,856$14,058$8,749 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2021$9,789$12,855$14,797$9,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,992 rated schools reporting
2022$9,861$16,012$15,708$10,567 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,012 rated schools reporting
2023$11,888$18,250$16,792$11,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2024$13,419$16,356$18,125$12,335 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 rated schools reporting
2025$18,020$15,950$18,972$13,185 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,895+$1,297 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−38.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.4−5.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Benavides Elem

11 to 20 years: 40%21 to 30 years: 60%
  • 11 to 20 years 40%
  • 21 to 30 years 60%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 reporting for every category shown · 2,084 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Benavides Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBenavides Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1217.9
Grade 1818.2
Grade 2418.3
Grade 31518.6
Grade 4718.9
Grade 5719.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 7,227

    Math — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 65

    Math — Masters

    Similar size · of the 65 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 5of 78

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 78 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 65

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 8of 76

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 76 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 24of 502

    Per-student spending

    Region 01: Edinburg · of the 502 that report this measure

  • 77of 1,949

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,949 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 253901101.