+0.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,122 of 2,213tied with 94 others
Score vs region
−2.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
131 of 191tied with 5 others
Score vs county
−3.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County
Jim Wells County placement
12 of 15among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
−2.9 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,674 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,065 of 1,674tied with 77 others
Score vs state
−3.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,963 of 7,646tied with 264 others
C78
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County.The current score is below the 80.9 average for 1,674 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
45%vs 41.8% avg · +3.2 pts
Masters
18%vs 16.4% avg · +1.6 pts
Among 2,048 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Texas average.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,122nd of 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 94 others).
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 131st of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 5 others).
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 12th of 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County.
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.9 average for 1,674 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,065th of 1,674 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 77 others).
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement73 C+1.0 vs similar economic context · 2,048 reporting
School Progress80 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
Closing the Gaps74 C−0.6 vs similar economic context · 2,026 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,995 reporting
Relative Performance80 B+3.0 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,213 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
73
C
7
School Progress
80
B
10
Closing the Gaps
74
C
6
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
80
B
10
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so
Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level72%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Meets grade level45%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Meets grade level56%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Meets grade level44%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Masters grade level16%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level44%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level13%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,213 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
230
Economically disadvantaged
80.9%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.0%−27.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.6%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.9%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
African American 0.4%
Hispanic 89.6%
White 10%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting for every category shown · 2,213 in full cohort
African American 14.1%
Hispanic 68.7%
White 12.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 77.5%
White 17.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 84.2%
White 14.8%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 49.4%
White 36.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
230
Economically disadvantaged students
186
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
52
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
197
TEA-published mobility rate
9.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 230 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (3.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
230
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−8
Decrease · −3.4%
Change since 2021–22
−32
Decrease · −12.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
230
Selected comparison
627.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,184 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
School year
Students enrolledBen Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
262
First available year
654.1
2022–23
266
Increase of 4 (1.5%)
656.9
2023–24
260
Decrease of 6 (2.3%)
650.5
2024–25
238
Decrease of 22 (8.5%)
647.3
2025–26
230
Decrease of 8 (3.4%)
627.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
4.31 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
255
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.31
Selected comparison
32.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,728 rated schools reporting
−28.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
287
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
279
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
282
10
3.5%
17
6.03
13.8%
34
2023–24
275
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
255
Suppressed
—
11
4.31
—
32.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
4.31
—
32.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
Parent district: Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,952
Selected comparison
$13,071
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting
−$4,119 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,952 per student for this campus, $20,675 per student for its parent district, Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
Parent district: Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,029
$12,476
$13,054
$8,161
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,315
$12,626
$13,108
$8,279
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,814
$12,315
$14,058
$8,783
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,121 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,256
$12,752
$14,797
$9,434
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,131 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,568
$15,046
$15,708
$10,877
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,149 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,348
$15,137
$16,792
$11,360
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,167 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,509
$20,646
$18,125
$12,318
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,184 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,952
$20,675
$18,972
$13,071
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,692−$518 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−23.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.7−2.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
1 to 5 years 10.2%
6 to 10 years 35.7%
11 to 20 years 43.9%
21 to 30 years 10.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting for every category shown · 2,213 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
Beginning 2.4%
1 to 5 years 22.1%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 29.8%
21 to 30 years 18.5%
Over 30 years 9.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBen Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
18
Grade 1
16
18.4
Grade 2
15
18.4
Grade 3
15
18.9
Grade 4
20.3
19
Grade 5
10.1
20
Grade 6
17.5
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
13 measures
5of 14
Reading — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 14
Math — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
5of 14
Math — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 14
Academic Growth
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 14
All Subjects — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
8of 14
Closing the Gaps
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 14
All Subjects — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
8of 14
Reading — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
8of 14
Reading — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 14
Math — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
9of 15
Attendance
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
10of 14
All Subjects — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 125902101.