Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem

Jim Wells County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 230 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,122 of 2,213tied with 94 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
45%vs 41.8% avg · +3.2 pts
Masters
18%vs 16.4% avg · +1.6 pts

Among 2,048 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 38% avg · +6 pts
Masters
16%vs 14.2% avg · +1.8 pts

Among 2,036 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 46.4% avg · +9.6 pts
Masters
25%vs 18.2% avg · +6.8 pts

Among 2,046 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,122nd of 2,213 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 94 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBen Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem 8085798278 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7877.5 2,213 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8277.1 2,199 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7974.6 2,185 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8575.0 2,167 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8081.6 2,148 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C+1.0 vs similar economic context · 2,048 reporting
  • School Progress80 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−0.6 vs similar economic context · 2,026 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,995 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+3.0 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
  • Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,213 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level44%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,213 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
230
Economically disadvantaged
80.9%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.0%−27.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.6%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.9%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem

African American: 0.4%Hispanic: 89.6%White: 10%
  • African American 0.4%
  • Hispanic 89.6%
  • White 10%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting for every category shown · 2,213 in full cohort

African American: 14.1%Hispanic: 68.7%White: 12.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 14.1%
  • Hispanic 68.7%
  • White 12.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
230
Economically disadvantaged students
186
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
52

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
197
TEA-published mobility rate
9.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 230 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (3.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
230

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−8

Decrease · −3.4%

Change since 2021–22
−32

Decrease · −12.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
230
Selected comparison
627.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,184 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBen Bolt-Palito Blanco ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 262 First available year 654.1
2022–23 266 Increase of 4 (1.5%) 656.9
2023–24 260 Decrease of 6 (2.3%) 650.5
2024–25 238 Decrease of 22 (8.5%) 647.3
2025–26 230 Decrease of 8 (3.4%) 627.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
11

4.31 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
255

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.31
Selected comparison
32.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,728 rated schools reporting

−28.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 287 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 279 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 282 10 3.5% 17 6.03 13.8% 34
2023–24 275 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 255 Suppressed — 11 4.31 — 32.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 11 4.31 — 32.4
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem
  • Parent district: Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,952
Selected comparison
$13,071

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting

−$4,119 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,952 per student for this campus, $20,675 per student for its parent district, Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBen Bolt-Palito Blanco ElemParent district: Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,029$12,476$13,054$8,161 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting
2019$6,315$12,626$13,108$8,279 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 rated schools reporting
2020$5,814$12,315$14,058$8,783 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,121 rated schools reporting
2021$6,256$12,752$14,797$9,434 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,131 rated schools reporting
2022$6,568$15,046$15,708$10,877 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,149 rated schools reporting
2023$6,348$15,137$16,792$11,360 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,167 rated schools reporting
2024$9,509$20,646$18,125$12,318 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,184 rated schools reporting
2025$8,952$20,675$18,972$13,071 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,692−$518 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−23.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.7−2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem

1 to 5 years: 10.2%6 to 10 years: 35.7%11 to 20 years: 43.9%21 to 30 years: 10.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 10.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 35.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 43.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting for every category shown · 2,213 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ben Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBen Bolt-Palito Blanco Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1618
Grade 11618.4
Grade 21518.4
Grade 31518.9
Grade 420.319
Grade 510.120
Grade 617.517.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 5of 14

    Reading — Masters

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Math — Masters

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 14

    Academic Growth

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    All Subjects — Masters

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 15

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 14

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 14

    Math — Meets

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 9of 15

    Attendance

    Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    All Subjects — Meets

    Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 125902101.