Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Bedford JHA90vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Bedford JH
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 998 students
Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 1,599 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
308 of 1,599tied with 75 others
Score vs region
+9.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
166 of 839tied with 26 others
Score vs county
+10.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
94 of 466tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+8.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 2,640 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
576 of 2,640tied with 128 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.5 average for 1,599 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 81.6 average for 2,640 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 54.4% avg · +14.6 pts
Masters
38%vs 24% avg · +14 pts
Among 1,550 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bedford JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.5 average for 1,599 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 308th of 1,599 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 75 others).
Bedford JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 166th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 26 others).
Bedford JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 94th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 13 others).
Bedford JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 2,640 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 576th of 2,640 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 128 others).
Bedford JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+8.5 vs similar economic context · 1,550 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.3 vs similar economic context · 1,545 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,534 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,517 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,545 reporting
Bedford JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,599 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 reporting
Meets grade level69%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 reporting
Masters grade level38%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,548 reporting
Meets grade level73%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,548 reporting
Masters grade level38%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,548 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
Meets grade level69%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
Masters grade level34%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,432 reporting
Meets grade level73%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,432 reporting
Masters grade level48%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,432 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Meets grade level52%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Masters grade level31%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,599 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
998
Economically disadvantaged
47.2%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.3%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.0%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bedford JH
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 32.4%
White 43.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 4%
Pacific Islander 1%
Two or More Races 7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,599 reporting for every category shown · 1,599 in full cohort
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 39.3%
White 43.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,640 reporting for every category shown · 2,640 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 52%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
998
Economically disadvantaged students
471
Emergent bilingual students
143
Special education students
140
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
120
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,045
TEA-published mobility rate
11.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 998 students in 2025–26, an increase of 30 (3.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
998
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+30
Increase · +3.1%
Change since 2021–22
+36
Increase · +3.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
998
Selected comparison
661.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Bedford JH
School year
Students enrolledBedford JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
962
First available year
659.2
2022–23
969
Increase of 7 (0.7%)
664.5
2023–24
1,001
Increase of 32 (3.3%)
663.7
2024–25
968
Decrease of 33 (3.3%)
661.5
2025–26
998
Increase of 30 (3.1%)
661.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
142
13.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
573
55.52 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,032
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
13.8%
Selected comparison
11.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 rated schools reporting
+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
55.52
Selected comparison
26
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 rated schools reporting
+29.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bedford JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,012
98
9.7%
301
29.74
9.5%
18
2021–22
1,039
194
18.7%
641
61.69
11.8%
25.6
2022–23
1,047
193
18.4%
556
53.10
12.1%
27
2023–24
1,042
151
14.5%
552
52.98
12.1%
27.8
2024–25
1,032
142
13.8%
573
55.52
11.8%
26
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bedford JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
142
13.8%
573
55.52
11.8%
26
In-school suspensions
140
13.6%
440
42.64
10.7%
20.1
Out-of-school suspensions
37
3.6%
51
4.94
5.9%
8.3
DAEP placements
64
6.2%
82
7.95
4.3%
5.1
Mandatory DAEP placements
49
4.8%
62
6.01
3.2%
3.7
Discretionary DAEP placements
19
1.8%
20
1.94
2.5%
2.8
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Bedford JH
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,029
Selected comparison
$11,966
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,568 rated schools reporting
−$3,937 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,029 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Bedford JH
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,364
$10,047
$13,054
$7,808
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,444 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,249
$11,598
$13,108
$7,993
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,463 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,114
$15,516
$14,058
$8,477
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,475 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,255
$12,690
$14,797
$8,884
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,495 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,282
$12,184
$15,708
$10,152
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,508 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,482
$14,299
$16,792
$10,601
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,525 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,058
$15,258
$18,125
$11,568
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,029
$17,072
$18,972
$11,966
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,568 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,401+$6,394 vs similar economic context
Teachers
59+16.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8−3.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bedford JH
Beginning 5.1%
1 to 5 years 16.4%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 30.2%
Over 30 years 0.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,599 reporting for every category shown · 1,599 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 29.8%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,640 reporting for every category shown · 2,640 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bedford JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBedford JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
18.2
15.2
Secondary languages other than English
21.2
17.6
Secondary math
21.6
16.2
Secondary science
22.3
17.7
Secondary social studies
20.9
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
35of 810
Relative Performance
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 14
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916044.