Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 4 points
85 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 15.6 points above the 73.4 average among 38 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus
Basis Cedar Park Pri
Basis Texas · Cedar Park · 834 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 95/1002025-26
- Change
- ±0 ptssince 2023-24
- Score vs similar economic context
- +5.5 ptsvs 89.5 average · 39 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 10 of 39tied with 3 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +12.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 375 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 17 of 375tied with 15 others
- Score vs state
- +13.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 41 of 829tied with 32 others
A95
At a glance
The available rating history is flat. The current score is above the 89.5 average for 39 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.1 average for 375 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 91%vs 69.9% avg · +21.1 pts
- Masters
- 67%vs 40.7% avg · +26.3 pts
Among 39 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 39 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 39 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 91%vs 65.4% avg · +25.6 pts
- Masters
- 67%vs 36.2% avg · +30.8 pts
Among 38 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 38 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 38 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 4 points
85 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 8.5 points above the 80.5 average among 375 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-size average
94 +21.1 pts vs 72.9
- 94 is 21.1 points above the 72.9 average among 374 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
- Tied for 2nd of 374 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure; 2 charter campuses share that value.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 91%vs 48.5% avg · +42.5 pts
- Masters
- 67%vs 21.2% avg · +45.8 pts
Among 375 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st of 375 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure; 2 charter campuses share that value.
- 1st of 375 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 4 points
85 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 10 points above the 79 average among 816 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas charter averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 91%vs 45.5% avg · +45.5 pts
- Masters
- 67%vs 18.8% avg · +48.2 pts
Among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
- Tied for 2nd of 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure; 2 charter campuses share that value.
- 2nd of 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Math above Texas charter averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 91%vs 38.4% avg · +52.6 pts
- Masters
- 67%vs 15.6% avg · +51.4 pts
Among 822 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 822 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 822 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Basis Cedar Park Pri is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89.5 average for 39 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 10th of 39 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).
Basis Cedar Park Pri is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 375 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 17th of 375 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 15 others).
Basis Cedar Park Pri is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 41st of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 32 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
3 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 95 | 89.5 39 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 94 | 90.4 30 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 95 | 89.2 30 reporting | 79.5 776 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Basis Cedar Park Pri
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (39 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 96 | A | — |
| School Progress | 94 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 93 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 94 | A | — |
| Relative Performance | 89 | B | 1 |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (39 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 834
- Economically disadvantaged
- 1.3%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 23.0%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 2.6%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 5.6%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Basis Cedar Park Pri
- African American 0.5%
- Hispanic 1.4%
- White 4.4%
- American Indian 1.8%
- Asian 89.6%
- Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- African American 8.5%
- Hispanic 17.2%
- White 30.9%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 37%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 375 reporting for every category shown · 375 in full cohort
- African American 14.7%
- Hispanic 67%
- White 9.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 834
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 11
- Emergent bilingual students
- 192
- Special education students
- 22
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 25
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 736
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 3.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 834 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 25 (2.9%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 834
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −25
Decrease · −2.9%
- Change since 2023–24
- +116
Increase · +16.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 834
- Selected comparison
- 679.3
| School year | Students enrolledBasis Cedar Park Pri | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 718 | First available year | 705.5 |
| 2024–25 | 859 | Increase of 141 (19.6%) | 729.1 |
| 2025–26 | 834 | Decrease of 25 (2.9%) | 679.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 20
2.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 35
4.00 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 874
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 2.3%
- Selected comparison
- 4.4%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 4
- Selected comparison
- 6.8
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 735 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 874 | 20 | 2.3% | 35 | 4.00 | 4.4% | 6.8 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 20 | 2.3% | 35 | 4.00 | 4.4% | 6.8 |
| In-school suspensions | 18 | 2.1% | 18 | 2.06 | 3.9% | 5.2 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | 17 | 1.95 | — | 3.9 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Basis Cedar Park Pri
- Parent district: Basis Texas
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $7,174
- Selected comparison
- $10,362
For 2025, TEA reported $7,174 per student for this campus, $11,226 per student for its parent district, Basis Texas, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Basis Cedar Park Pri | Parent district: Basis Texas | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $8,119 | $11,157 | $18,125 | $9,785 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2025 | $7,174 | $11,226 | $18,972 | $10,362 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 63 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
7 measures
-
1of 375
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 375
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 375
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure
-
1of 375
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 375
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure
-
1of 375
Math — Meets
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure
-
1of 375
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
-
2of 375
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 374
Academic Growth
Similar size · of the 374 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 365
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 365 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
3of 375
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure
-
3of 365
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 365 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
-
5of 365
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 365 that report this measure
-
6of 38
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
-
9of 375
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 375 that report this measure · tied with 5
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
-
20of 369
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 369 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015834107.