Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
91 +2.6 pts vs 88.4
- 91 is 2.6 points above the 88.4 average among 57 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Basepoint Academy - Forney
University of Texas University Charter School · Forney · 50 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 91/1002025-26
- Score vs similar economic context
- +2.6 ptsvs 88.4 average · 57 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 23 of 57tied with 5 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +5.0 ptsvs 86 average · 32 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 11 of 32tied with 3 others
- Score vs state
- +9.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 167 of 829tied with 39 others
A91
At a glance
The current score is above the 88.4 average for 57 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 86 average for 32 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
91 +2 pts vs 89
- 91 is 2 points above the 89 average among 57 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
91 +5 pts vs 86
- 91 is 5 points above the 86 average among 32 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-size average
91 +6.1 pts vs 84.9
- 91 is 6.1 points above the 84.9 average among 32 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
37% −7.5 pts vs 44.5%
- 37% is 7.5 percentage points lower than the 44.5% average among 28 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Texas charter average
91 +9.3 pts vs 81.7
- 91 is 9.3 points above the 81.7 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the Texas charter average
91 +12.9 pts vs 78.1
- 91 is 12.9 points above the 78.1 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Basepoint Academy - Forney is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.4 average for 57 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 23rd of 57 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 5 others).
Basepoint Academy - Forney is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 32 similarly sized rated charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 11th of 32 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 3 others).
Basepoint Academy - Forney is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 167th of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 39 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 91 | 88.4 57 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 89.7 45 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Basepoint Academy - Forney
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (57 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 91 | A | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (57 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−13.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 3 rated charter campuses reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 3 rated charter campuses reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 3 rated charter campuses reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 7.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 3 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 50
- Economically disadvantaged
- 8.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−14.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 18.0%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 89.2%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 37.0%+27.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Basepoint Academy - Forney
- African American 10%
- Hispanic 22%
- White 54%
- Asian 6%
- Two or More Races 8%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 reporting for every category shown · 57 in full cohort
- African American 9%
- Hispanic 20.3%
- White 30.7%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 33.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 32 reporting for every category shown · 32 in full cohort
- African American 20.8%
- Hispanic 43.7%
- White 29.3%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 2.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 50
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 4
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 9
TEA context labels
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 96
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 96
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 100%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 50 students in 2025–26, an increase of 34 (212.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 50
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +34
Increase · +212.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 50
- Selected comparison
- 610.6
| School year | Students enrolledBasepoint Academy - Forney | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 16 | First available year | 630.1 |
| 2025–26 | 50 | Increase of 34 (212.5%) | 610.6 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 75
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 75 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Basepoint Academy - Forney
- Parent district: University of Texas University Charter School
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,362
- Selected comparison
- $10,927
For 2025, TEA reported $12,362 per student for this campus, $21,119 per student for its parent district, University of Texas University Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Basepoint Academy - Forney | Parent district: University of Texas University Charter School | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $12,362 | $21,119 | $18,972 | $10,927 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $73,069+$9,610 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 2−33.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 29.6+12.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Basepoint Academy - Forney
- 11 to 20 years 64.7%
- 21 to 30 years 35.3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 reporting for every category shown · 57 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.4%
- 6 to 10 years 12.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.7%
- 21 to 30 years 7.1%
- Over 30 years 1.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 32 reporting for every category shown · 32 in full cohort
- Beginning 10.3%
- 1 to 5 years 38.9%
- 6 to 10 years 13%
- 11 to 20 years 23.3%
- 21 to 30 years 11.2%
- Over 30 years 0.3%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 41 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
-
8of 31
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 49
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 49 that report this measure
-
9of 32
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 32 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227806059.