Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Basepoint Academy - Arlington

University of Texas University Charter School · Arlington · 34 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+6.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 61 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
12 of 61tied with 3 others
A93

At a glance

The current score is above the 86.8 average for 61 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Top placement

Earned an industry-based certification

50% 1st of 27 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

93 +6.2 pts vs 86.8

  • 93 is 6.2 points above the 86.8 average among 61 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

93 +6 pts vs 87

  • 93 is 6 points above the 87 average among 61 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Basepoint Academy - Arlington is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 61 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 12th of 61 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 93 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9386.8 61 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—87.5 53 reporting81.3 797 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement93 A+6.0 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.9 · 58 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 84.4 · 57 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 77.2 · 57 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 58 reporting
  • Basepoint Academy - Arlington
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (61 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement93A—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 87.9% · 60 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 72% · 60 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 36.7% · 60 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 79.3% · 59 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 55.3% · 59 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 26.4% · 59 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 81.8% · 56 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 58.5% · 56 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 28.3% · 56 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 83.4% · 41 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 58.8% · 41 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 31.3% · 41 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (61 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−39.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−40.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−39.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
6.0%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%75.0%−75.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%64.7%−64.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%20.5%−20.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%33.5%−33.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification50.0%2.8%+47.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.0%+0.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.8%−7.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%0.7%−0.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%1.0%−1.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.2%−1.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
34
Economically disadvantaged
17.6%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−12.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.5%+9.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.1%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
32.5%+20.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Basepoint Academy - Arlington

African American: 14.7%Hispanic: 32.4%White: 35.3%Asian: 5.9%Two or More Races: 11.8%
  • African American 14.7%
  • Hispanic 32.4%
  • White 35.3%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Two or More Races 11.8%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 reporting for every category shown · 61 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 29.6%White: 35.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 19.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 29.6%
  • White 35.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 19.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
34
Economically disadvantaged students
6
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
8

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
100
Students in TEA mobility denominator
100
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 34 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (126.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
34

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+19

Increase · +126.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
34
Selected comparison
585

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Basepoint Academy - Arlington
School yearStudents enrolledBasepoint Academy - ArlingtonChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 15 First available year 561.7
2025–26 34 Increase of 19 (126.7%) 585

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
81

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Basepoint Academy - Arlington
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 81 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Basepoint Academy - Arlington in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$10k$16k$22k2025
  • Basepoint Academy - Arlington
  • Parent district: University of Texas University Charter School
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,604
Selected comparison
$10,632

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter campuses reporting

+$3,972 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,604 per student for this campus, $21,119 per student for its parent district, University of Texas University Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBasepoint Academy - ArlingtonParent district: University of Texas University Charter SchoolTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$14,604$21,119$18,972$10,632 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$75,456+$16,423 vs similar economic context
Teachers
1−33.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
24.1−11.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Basepoint Academy - Arlington

1 to 5 years: 71.4%21 to 30 years: 28.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 71.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 28.6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 reporting for every category shown · 61 in full cohort

Beginning: 10.6%1 to 5 years: 37.5%6 to 10 years: 17.1%11 to 20 years: 16.1%21 to 30 years: 6.3%Over 30 years: 1%
  • Beginning 10.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.3%
  • Over 30 years 1%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 65 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 27

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 27 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 21

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

9 measures

  • 5of 57

    Per-student spending

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 57 that report this measure

  • 6of 21

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 21

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 8of 21

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 11

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 21

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 10of 18

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 10of 18

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar size · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227806058.